| Literature DB >> 29510725 |
Rachita K Sumbria1,2, Mher Mahoney Grigoryan2, Vitaly Vasilevko3, Annlia Paganini-Hill2, Kelley Kilday3, Ronald Kim4, David H Cribbs3, Mark J Fisher5,6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cerebral microhemorrhages (CMH) are commonly found in the aging brain. CMH are also the neuropathological substrate of cerebral microbleeds (CMB), demonstrated on brain MRI. Recent studies demonstrate the importance of systemic inflammation in CMH development, but the relationships among inflammation, aging, and CMH development are not well-defined. In the current study, we hypothesized that the pathogenesis of inflammation-induced CMH in mice differs by age.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Animal models; Cerebral microbleeds; Cerebral microhemorrhage; Hemosiderin; Inflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29510725 PMCID: PMC5840821 DOI: 10.1186/s12974-018-1092-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neuroinflammation ISSN: 1742-2094 Impact factor: 8.322
Fig. 1Surface and acute H&E-positive cerebral microhemorrhages (CMH). No development of surface CMH in young and aged saline-treated mice (n = 10 per group). Significant development of surface CMH in aged LPS-treated mice (n = 15) compared with young LPS-treated (n = 10) and aged saline-treated mice (n = 10) (a). No development of acute (H&E-positive) parenchymal CMH in saline-treated young mice. Significantly greater number, size, and total area of acute parenchymal CMH in LPS-treated aged mice compared with LPS-treated young mice and saline-treated aged mice (b–d). Brain images showing development of surface CMH in LPS-treated aged mice compared with LPS-treated young mice (e). Representative images showing acute CMH in different brain regions (f). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. One-sample t test for surface CMH, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test, or Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post-test. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01. Scale bar = 100 μm
Fig. 2Sub-acute Prussian Blue (PB)-positive cerebral microhemorrhages (CMH). Significantly higher number of PB-positive lesions in LPS-treated young (n = 10) and LPS-treated aged mice (n = 15) compared with their respective saline controls (n = 10 per group) (a). Significant increase in PB-positive lesion size with aging (b). Significant increase in PB-positive total lesion area in LPS-treated aged mice compared with LPS-treated young mice and saline-treated aged mice (c). PB-positive and H&E-positive lesion number are significantly correlated in aged mice (d). Representative images showing PB-positive stains in different brain regions (e). Scale bar = 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test or Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post-test; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001
Fig. 3Neuroinflammation, BBB disruption, and CMH development. Significantly higher Iba-1-positive immunoreactivity with aging (a), and GFAP- (b) and IgG- (c) positive immunoreactivity in LPS-treated aged mice compared with LPS-treated young mice. PB- and H&E-positive CMH numbers are significantly correlated with Iba-1 positive immunoreactivity in aged mice (d, e). Representative images of Iba-1, GFAP, and IgG immunohistochemistry (f). Data are presented as mean ± SEM. One-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s post-test or Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s post-test and Pearson correlation; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ****p < 0.0001