| Literature DB >> 29509765 |
Iraci Duarte Lima1,2,3, Adila L M Lima1,2,3,4, Carolina de Oliveira Mendes-Aguiar2, José F V Coutinho1,2,4, Mary E Wilson5, Richard D Pearson6, José Wilton Queiroz1,2,7, Selma M B Jeronimo1,2,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) caused by Leishmania infantum became a disease of urban areas in Brazil in the last 30 years and there has been an increase in asymptomatic L. infantum infection with these areas. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29509765 PMCID: PMC5839541 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Analysis of a 25-year time series of visceral leishmaniasis, VL/AIDS and HIV in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
A. Incidence of VL, AIDS, and VL-AIDS co-infections in Rio Grande do Norte 1990 to 2014. B. VL incidence by 100,000 inhabitants and the percent of VL lethality by five-year period.
Effect of time, sex and micro-region on the incidence of VL in accordance to model 1.
| Estimates of parameters β e θ | Standard Error | Density mean | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept (β0) | 275.597 | 45.517 | ||
| Year (β1) | ||||
| [Sex = Male] (β2) | ||||
| Microrregions | ||||
| 1- Mossoró (θ1) | 0.427 | 1.011 | 0.673 | 340.8 |
| 2- Chapada do Apodi(θ2) | -2.405 | 1.011 | 85.4 | |
| 3- MédioOeste(θ3) | -3.116 | 1.011 | 65.0 | |
| 4- Vale do Açu(θ4) | -1.265 | 1.011 | 0.211 | 133.3 |
| 5- Serra de São Miguel(θ5) | 0.260 | 1.011 | 0.797 | 302.0 |
| 6- Pau dos Ferros(θ6) | -1.289 | 1.011 | 0.202 | 208.2 |
| 7 -Umarizal(θ7) | -2.743 | 1.011 | 196.9 | |
| 8- Macau(θ8) | -3.197 | 1.011 | 124.9 | |
| 9- Angicos(θ9) | -1.927 | 1.011 | 0.057 | 61.7 |
| 10 -Serra de Santana(θ10) | -3.417 | 1.011 | 97.5 | |
| 11 –Seridó Ocidental(θ11) | -3.761 | 1.011 | 146.7 | |
| 12 -Seridó Oriental(θ12) | -2.840 | 1.011 | 151.4 | |
| 13 -Baixa Verde(θ13) | 1.608 | 1.011 | 0.112 | 149.1 |
| 14 –Borborema Potiguar(θ14) | -0.666 | 1.011 | 0.510 | 160.7 |
| 15- Agreste Potiguar(θ15) | -0.846 | 1.011 | 0.403 | 296.4 |
| 16—Northeastern littoral (θ16) | 1.011 | 145.5 | ||
| 17—Macaíba(θ17) | 1.011 | 586.4 | ||
| 18—Natal and perimetropolitan area (θ18) | 0.950 | 1.011 | 0.347 | 10202.9 |
Model (1): Y = β0 + β1t + β2I(Sex) + θ(i|19) + error
Reference: 19 –South coast (Density 415.5)
Fig 2The spread of visceral leishmaniasis by micro region in a 25-year period.
A. Map of Brazil showing in yellow the state of Rio Grande do Norte. Temporal and spatial distributions of human VL in the state of Rio Grande do Norte, 1990 to 2014, (cases/100,000 inhabitants).
Fig 3Incidence of VL by sex and year.
A. The incidence was higher in males than females (Beta = 2.498, p<0.0001). B. Mean age of VL per year.
Mean temporal variation of VL cases / 100,000 inhabitants according to the age group() (model 2).
| Age group | R2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p | P | ||||
| 0–4 | 0.5267 | <0.0001 | 0.6564 | ||
| 5–9 | 0.1829 | <0.0001 | 0.4740 | ||
| 10–19 | 0.1470 | <0.0001 | -0.0016 | 0.1320 | 0.0958 |
| 20–39 | 0.1385 | <0.0001 | 0.5636 | ||
| ≥40 | 0.0049 | 0.7400 | 0.8309 | ||
(*) Adjusting the model (2): Z = β0 + β1t + errorineachagegroup
Fig 4Risk factors for visceral leishmaniasis.
A. Association of Vaccination coverage with decreased the incidence of visceral leishmaniasis in children. Association between VL incidence(y) and vaccine coverage (x). y = 6.574 + 11.481x2 − 10.13x3, R2 = 0.82. B. Correlation between human VL and L. infantum infected dogs. C. Variation in rainfall index and its relation to the incidence of VL.