OBJECTIVE: : To evaluate Australian and New Zealand chiropractic students' opinions regarding the identity, role setting, and future of chiropractic practice. METHODS: : An online, cross-sectional survey was administered to chiropractic students in all chiropractic programs in Australia and New Zealand. The survey explored student viewpoints about the identity, role/scope, setting, and future of chiropractic practice as it relates to chiropractic education and health promotion. Associations between the number of years in the program, highest degree preceding chiropractic education, institution, and opinion summary scores were evaluated by multivariate analysis of variance tests. RESULTS: : A total of 347 chiropractic students participated in the study. For identity, most students (51.3%) hold strongly to the traditional chiropractic theory but also agree (94.5%) it is important that chiropractors are educated in evidence-based practice. The main predictor of student viewpoints was a student's chiropractic institution (Pillai's trace =.638, F[16, 1368] = 16.237, p < .001). Chiropractic institution explained over 50% of the variance around student opinions about role/scope of practice and approximately 25% for identity and future practice. CONCLUSIONS: : Chiropractic students in Australia and New Zealand seem to hold both traditional and mainstream viewpoints toward chiropractic practice. However, students from different chiropractic institutions have divergent opinions about the identity, role, setting, and future of chiropractic practice, which is most strongly predicted by the institution. Chiropractic education may be a potential determinant of chiropractic professional identity, raising concerns about heterogeneity between chiropractic schools.
OBJECTIVE: : To evaluate Australian and New Zealand chiropractic students' opinions regarding the identity, role setting, and future of chiropractic practice. METHODS: : An online, cross-sectional survey was administered to chiropractic students in all chiropractic programs in Australia and New Zealand. The survey explored student viewpoints about the identity, role/scope, setting, and future of chiropractic practice as it relates to chiropractic education and health promotion. Associations between the number of years in the program, highest degree preceding chiropractic education, institution, and opinion summary scores were evaluated by multivariate analysis of variance tests. RESULTS: : A total of 347 chiropractic students participated in the study. For identity, most students (51.3%) hold strongly to the traditional chiropractic theory but also agree (94.5%) it is important that chiropractors are educated in evidence-based practice. The main predictor of student viewpoints was a student's chiropractic institution (Pillai's trace =.638, F[16, 1368] = 16.237, p < .001). Chiropractic institution explained over 50% of the variance around student opinions about role/scope of practice and approximately 25% for identity and future practice. CONCLUSIONS: : Chiropractic students in Australia and New Zealand seem to hold both traditional and mainstream viewpoints toward chiropractic practice. However, students from different chiropractic institutions have divergent opinions about the identity, role, setting, and future of chiropractic practice, which is most strongly predicted by the institution. Chiropractic education may be a potential determinant of chiropractic professional identity, raising concerns about heterogeneity between chiropractic schools.
Keywords:
Attitude; Chiropractic; Cross-Sectional Studies; Students; Surveys and Questionnaires
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Thomas M Kosloff; David Elton; Stephanie A Shulman; Janice L Clarke; Alexis Skoufalos; Amanda Solis Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: Amir Qaseem; Timothy J Wilt; Robert M McLean; Mary Ann Forciea; Thomas D Denberg; Michael J Barry; Cynthia Boyd; R Dobbin Chow; Nick Fitterman; Russell P Harris; Linda L Humphrey; Sandeep Vijan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Eric L Hurwitz; Eugene J Carragee; Gabrielle van der Velde; Linda J Carroll; Margareta Nordin; Jaime Guzman; Paul M Peloso; Lena W Holm; Pierre Côté; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; J David Cassidy; Scott Haldeman Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Jordan A Gliedt; Cheryl Hawk; Michelle Anderson; Kashif Ahmad; Dinah Bunn; Jerrilyn Cambron; Brian Gleberzon; John Hart; Anupama Kizhakkeveettil; Stephen M Perle; Michael Ramcharan; Stephanie Sullivan; Liang Zhang Journal: Chiropr Man Therap Date: 2015-02-02
Authors: Marion McGregor; Aaron A Puhl; Christine Reinhart; H Stephen Injeyan; David Soave Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2014-02-10 Impact factor: 3.659