| Literature DB >> 29508688 |
Jane Maddock1, Nida Ziauddeen2, Gina L Ambrosini3, Andrew Wong1, Rebecca Hardy1, Sumantra Ray2.
Abstract
Little is known about long-term associations between the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet and conventional cardiovascular (CV)-risk factors as well as novel measures of vascular function. This study aimed to examine whether long-term adherence to a DASH-type diet in a British birth cohort is associated with conventional CV-risk factors and two vascular function markers, carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and pulse wave velocity (PWV). Data came from 1409 participants of the Medical Research Council (MRC) National Survey of Health and Development. Dietary intake was assessed at 36, 43, 53 and 60-64 years using 5-d estimated food diaries. The DASH-type diet score was calculated using the Fung index. Conventional CV-risk factors (blood pressure (BP) and lipids), cIMT in the right and/or left common carotid artery and PWV was measured when participants were 60-64 years. Associations between the DASH-type diet score and outcomes were assessed using multiple regression models adjusted for socioeconomic position, BMI, smoking and physical activity. Participants in higher sex-specific quintiles (Q) of the long-term DASH-type diet had lower BP (P≤0·08), higher HDL-cholesterol (P<0·001) and lower TAG (P<0·001) compared with people in Q1. Participants in Q5 of the long-term DASH-type diet had lower PWV (-0·28 sd; 95 % CI -0·50, -0·07, P trend=0·01) and cIMT (-0·24 sd; 95 % CI -0·44, -0·04, P trend=0·02) compared with participants in the Q1. This association was independent of the conventional CV-risk factors. Greater adherence to a DASH diet over the life course is associated with conventional CV-risk factors and independently associated with cIMT and PWV.Entities:
Keywords: BP blood pressure; CV cardiovascular; DASH Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; DBP diastolic blood pressure; MRC Medical Research Council; NSHD National Survey of Health and Development; PVW pulse wave velocity; Q quintiles; RCT randomised controlled trials; SBP systolic blood pressure; SEP socioeconomic position; cIMT carotid intima–media thickness; British birth cohort; Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension diet; Life course epidemiology; Vascular function
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29508688 PMCID: PMC5848753 DOI: 10.1017/S0007114517003877
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Nutr ISSN: 0007-1145 Impact factor: 3.718
Fig. 1Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension-type diet score per year by sex of the 769 participants with dietary data from all time points.
Descriptives of participants with at least one vascular measure and dietary information from more than one time point (n 1409)(Numbers and percentages; mean values and standard deviations)
| Men ( | Women ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % | Mean |
|
| % | Mean |
| |
| Socioeconomic status at 53 years (or 43 years if missing) | ||||||||
| Professional and managerial | 429 | 64·3 | 323 | 45·2 | ||||
| Skilled non-manual | 67 | 10·0 | 260 | 36·4 | ||||
| Skilled manual | 124 | 18·6 | 43 | 6·1 | ||||
| Semi-skilled and unskilled | 47 | 7·1 | 89 | 12·5 | ||||
| BMI at 60–64 years (kg/m2) | 673 | 27·6 | 3·8 | 736 | 27·3 | 5·0 | ||
| Smoking status at 60–64 years (or 53/69 years if missing) | 543 | 10·8 | 15·3 | 585 | 7·7 | 13·2 | ||
| Current | 61 | 9·2 | 63 | 8·6 | ||||
| Ex-smoker | 409 | 61·5 | 394 | 53·3 | ||||
| Never smoker | 195 | 29·3 | 279 | 38·1 | ||||
| Self-reported physical activity since 1982 | ||||||||
| Inactive at all ages | 71 | 10·6 | 96 | 13·0 | ||||
| Active at least once/month | 551 | 81·9 | 605 | 82·2 | ||||
| Active more than once/month | 51 | 7·6 | 35 | 4·8 | ||||
| Antihypertensive medication at 60–64 years | ||||||||
| No | 463 | 71·0 | 547 | 75·6 | ||||
| Yes | 189 | 29·0 | 177 | 24·5 | ||||
| Lipid-lowering medication at 60–64 years | ||||||||
| No | 501 | 74·4 | 623 | 84·7 | ||||
| Yes | 172 | 25·6 | 113 | 15·4 | ||||
| Vascular phenotype at 60–64 years | ||||||||
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 672 | 138·8 | 18·1 | 732 | 132·1 | 7·4 | ||
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 673 | 78·9 | 10·0 | 732 | 75·5 | 9·4 | ||
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 648 | 5·3 | 1·1 | 697 | 6·1 | 1·2 | ||
| LDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) | 627 | 3·3 | 0·9 | 684 | 3·8 | 1·0 | ||
| HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) | 648 | 1·4 | 0·3 | 697 | 1·8 | 0·4 | ||
| TAG (mmol/l) | 632 | 1·4 | 0·9 | 686 | 1·1 | 0·6 | ||
| Carotid intima–media thickness (mm) | 639 | 0·71 | 0·15 | 696 | 0·67 | 0·11 | ||
| Pulse wave velocity (m/s) | 501 | 8·31 | 1·41 | 580 | 8·03 | 1·57 | ||
| DASH-type diet score | ||||||||
| Long-term DASH score | 673 | 23·5 | 3·9 | 736 | 25·8 | 3·9 | ||
| Mean DASH score at 36 years | 554 | 23·4 | 4·7 | 615 | 25·0 | 5·1 | ||
| Mean DASH score at 43 years | 572 | 23·8 | 4·8 | 628 | 26·2 | 4·8 | ||
| Mean DASH score at 53 years | 478 | 23·5 | 5·1 | 575 | 26·4 | 4·9 | ||
| Mean DASH score at 60–64 years | 632 | 23·7 | 5·1 | 700 | 25·9 | 5·1 | ||
DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension.
Missing values not presented.
Average from 36, 43, 53 and 60–64 years in individuals with ≥2 d of dietary information.
Association between long-term Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) scores (sex-specific quintiles) and classic cardiovascular risk factors* unadjusted (Coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals)
| DASH Q2 | DASH Q3 | DASH Q4 | DASH Q5 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| DASH Q1 | Coefficient | 95 % CI | Coefficient | 95 % CI | Coefficient | 95 % CI | Coefficient | 95 % CI |
| |
| Unadjusted | |||||||||||
| Antihypertensive medication | 1841 | Ref. | 0·97 | 0·65, 1·28 | 0·68 | 0·36, 1·00 | 0·68 | 0·36, 1·00 | 0·56 | 0·23, 0·89 | <0·001 |
| Diastolic blood pressure | 1825 | Ref. | −0·35 | −2·21, 1·51 | −1·13 | −2·93, 0·67 | −1·78 | −3·57, 0·02 | −3·09 | −4·89, −1·30 | <0·001 |
| Systolic blood pressure | 1824 | Ref. | −1·98 | −5·40, 1·45 | −4·60 | −7·93, −1·28 | −5·39 | −8·70, −2·08 | −7·70 | −11·00, −4·40 | <0·001 |
| Lipid-lowering medication | 1883 | Ref. | 0·93 | 0·60, 1·25 | 0·62 | 0·28, 0·96 | 0·63 | 0·29, 0·97 | 0·45 | 0·08, 0·81 | <0·001 |
| Total cholesterol | 1746 | Ref. | −0·07 | −0·25, 0·12 | −0·02 | −0·20, 0·15 | −0·09 | −0·26, 0·09 | −0·15 | −0·32, 0·03 | 0·10 |
| LDL-cholesterol | 1670 | Ref. | −0·08 | −0·24, 0·08 | −0·02 | −0·18, 0·13 | −0·06 | −0·21, 0·10 | −0·07 | −0·22, 0·08 | 0·50 |
| HDL-cholesterol | 1746 | Ref. | 0·05 | −0·01, 0·12 | 0·10 | 0·04, 0·17 | 0·11 | 0·04, 0·17 | 0·15 | 0·08, 0·21 | <0·001 |
| ln TAG | 1679 | Ref. | −7·27 | −16·56, 2·02 | −24·51 | −33·50, −15·52 | −25·73 | −34·77, −16·69 | −41·35 | −50·30, −32·40 | <0·001 |
| Adjusted for SEP, BMI, smoking and physical activity | |||||||||||
| Antihypertensive medication | 1774 | Ref. | 0·98 | 0·64, 1·32 | 0·73 | 0·39, 1·08 | 0·82 | 0·48, 1·17 | 0·78 | 0·41, 1·15 | 0·12 |
| Diastolic blood pressure | 1759 | Ref. | −0·35 | −2·19, 1·50 | −0·60 | −2·41, 1·21 | −0·97 | −2·80, 0·86 | −1·59 | −3·49, 0·31 | 0·08 |
| Systolic blood pressure | 1758 | Ref. | −1·93 | −5·35, 1·49 | −3·45 | −6·81, −0·08 | −3·62 | −7·01, −0·23 | −4·83 | −8·35, −1·31 | 0·01 |
| Lipid-lowering medication | 1813 | Ref. | 1·01 | 0·66, 1·36 | 0·68 | 0·32, 1·05 | 0·76 | 0·39, 1·12 | 0·61 | 0·21, 1·02 | 0·01 |
| Total cholesterol | 1687 | Ref. | −0·13 | −0·32, 0·06 | −0·07 | −0·25, 0·12 | −0·11 | −0·30, 0·08 | −0·16 | −0·35, 0·04 | 0·19 |
| LDL-cholesterol | 1617 | Ref. | −0·13 | −0·30, 0·04 | −0·05 | −0·22, 0·11 | −0·07 | −0·23, 0·10 | −0·06 | −0·23, 0·11 | 0·83 |
| HDL-cholesterol | 1687 | Ref. | 0·03 | −0·03, 0·09 | 0·05 | −0·01, 0·11 | 0·04 | −0·03, 0·10 | 0·05 | −0·02, 0·11 | <0·001 |
| ln TAG | 1626 | Ref. | −2·89 | −11·88, 6·09 | −13·84 | −22·64, −5·04 | −13·35 | −22·31, −4·39 | −22·59 | −31·85, −13·33 | <0·001 |
Q, sex-specific quintile; Ref., referent values.
N’s not restricted to those with carotid intima–media thickness or pulse wave velocity measures.
Linear trend test, that is DASH quintiles fitted as continuous exposure in regression model. No evidence for deviation from linear tend using log likelihood ratio test, that is testing DASH quintiles fitted as continuous exposure v. DASH quintiles fitted as categorical exposure, P≥0·17 for all models.
Logistic regression, OR presented.
Censored regression to account for medication use.
Long-term Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score and vascular function (Coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals)
| Standardised carotid intima–media
thickness | Standardised pulse wave velocity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | 95 % CI | Coefficient | 95 % CI | |
| DASH score sex-specific quintiles (Q) | ||||
| Model 1 | ||||
| Q1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
| Q2 | −0·08 | −0·28, 0·12 | −0·13 | −0·35, 0·09 |
| Q3 | −0·15 | −0·34, 0·04 | −0·07 | −0·28, 0·14 |
| Q4 | −0·18 | 0·37, 0·01 | −0·18 | −0·39, 0·02 |
| Q5 | −0·35 | −0·54, −0·16 | −0·30 | −0·51, −0·10 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
| Model 2 | ||||
| Q1 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | −0·06 | −0·26, 0·14 | −0·13 | −0·35, 0·09 |
| Q3 | −0·10 | −0·29, 0·09 | −0·06 | −0·27, 0·15 |
| Q4 | −0·10 | −0·29, 0·09 | −0·17 | −0·38, 0·04 |
| Q5 | −0·24 | −0·44, −0·04 | −0·28 | −0·50, −0·07 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
Ref., referent values.
cIMT model 1: n 1309 model 2: n 1298.
PWV model 1: n 1061 model 2: n 1051.
Linear trend test, that is DASH quintiles fitted as continuous exposure in regression model.
Log likelihood ratio test, that is testing DASH quintiles fitted as continuous exposure v. DASH quintiles fitted as categorical exposure.
Model 1 adjusted for socioeconomic position; model 2 additionally adjusted for BMI, smoking and physical activity.
Long-term Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score and vascular function adjusted for conventional cardiovascular risk factors|| (Coefficients and 95 % confidence intervals)
| Standardised carotid intima–media
thickness | Standardised pulse wave velocity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DASH score sex-specific quintiles (Q) | Coefficient | 95 % CI | Coefficient | 95 % CI |
| Q1 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
| Q2 | −0·04 | −0·24, 0·16 | −0·14 | −0·35, 0·08 |
| Q3 | −0·08 | −0·27, 0·11 | −0·07 | −0·27, 0·13 |
| Q4 | −0·07 | −0·26, 0·13 | −0·13 | −0·33, 0·07 |
| Q5 | −0·24 | −0·44, −0·04 | −0·24 | −0·45, −0·04 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
| |||
cIMT: n 1220.
PWV: n 980.
Linear trend test, that is DASH quintiles fitted as continuous exposure in regression model.
Log likelihood ratio test, that is testing DASH quintiles fitted as continuous exposure v. DASH quintiles fitted as categorical exposure.
Adjusted for socioeconomic position, BMI, smoking and physical activity, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, lipid-lowering medication, HDL-cholesterol, TAG.