Literature DB >> 29508673

Driving for successful change processes in healthcare by putting staff at the wheel.

Gudbjörg Erlingsdottir1, Anders Ersson2, Jonas Borell1, Christofer Rydenfält1.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe five salient factors that emerge in two successful change processes in healthcare. Organizational changes in healthcare are often characterized by problems and solutions that have been formulated by higher levels of management. This top-down management approach has not been well received by the professional community. As a result, improvement processes are frequently abandoned, resulting in disrupted and dysfunctional organizations. This paper presents two successful change processes where managerial leadership was used to coach the change processes by distributing mandates and resources. After being managerially initiated, both processes were driven by local agency, decisions, planning and engagement. Design/methodology/approach The data in the paper derive from two qualitative case studies. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations and document studies. The cases are presented as process descriptions covering the different phases of the change processes. The focus in the studies is on the roles and interactions of the actors involved, the type of leadership and the distribution of agency. Findings Five factors emerged as paramount to the successful change processes in the two cases: local ownership of problems; a coached process where management initiates the change process and the problem recognition, and then lets the staff define the problems, formulate solutions and drive necessary changes; distributed leadership directed at enabling and supporting the staff's intentions and long-term self-leadership; mutually formulated norms and values that serve as a unifying force for the staff; and generous time allocation and planning, which allows the process to take time, and creates room for reevaluation. The authors also noted that in both cases, reorganization into multi-professional teams lent stability and endurance to the completed changes. Originality/value The research shows how management can initiate and support successful change processes that are staff driven and characterized by local agency, decisions, planning and engagement. Empirical descriptions of successful change processes are rare, which is why the description of such processes in this research increases the value of the paper.

Keywords:  Change; Healthcare organization; Multi-professional teams; Self-leadership; Staff-driven process

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29508673     DOI: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2017-0027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Organ Manag        ISSN: 1477-7266


  7 in total

1.  Pain Management Program in Cardiology: A Template for Application of Normalization Process Theory and Social Marketing to Implement a Change in Practice Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Kerstin Bode; Peter Whittaker; Miriam Dressler; Yvonne Bauer; Haider Ali
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Effects of a multifaceted intervention QI program to improve ICU performance.

Authors:  Anders Ersson; Anders Beckman; Johan Jarl; Jonas Borell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare.

Authors:  Reema Harrison; Sarah Fischer; Ramesh L Walpola; Ashfaq Chauhan; Temitope Babalola; Stephen Mears; Huong Le-Dao
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2021-03-12

4.  Changing practice: assessing attitudes toward a NICE-informed collaborative treatment pathway for bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Adele Louise Elliott; Stuart Watson; Guy Dodgson; Esther Cohen-Tovée; Jonathan Ling
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2021-03-08

5.  Impact of COVID-19 on the Organization of Cancer Care in Belgium: Lessons Learned for the (Post-)Pandemic Future.

Authors:  Ilyse Kenis; Sofie Theys; Ella Hermie; Veerle Foulon; Ann Van Hecke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 6.  Change and Innovation in Healthcare: Findings from Literature.

Authors:  Frida Milella; Eliana Alessandra Minelli; Fernanda Strozzi; Davide Croce
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-05-19

7.  Impact of Empowering Leadership on Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Single Center Study in a Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and a Literature Review.

Authors:  Karin E Steinmann; Dirk Lehnick; Michael Buettcher; Katharina Schwendener-Scholl; Karin Daetwyler; Matteo Fontana; Davide Morgillo; Katja Ganassi; Kathrin O'Neill; Petra Genet; Susanne Burth; Patrizia Savoia; Ulrich Terheggen; Christoph Berger; Martin Stocker
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.418

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.