Literature DB >> 29508422

Why women go to medical college but fail to practise medicine: perspectives from the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Farhat Moazam1, Sualeha Shekhani1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Female medical students outnumber men in countries such as Saudi Arabia, India and Pakistan, yet many fail to practise medicine following graduation. In Pakistan, 70% of medical students are women, yet it is estimated that half of them will not pursue medicine following graduation. This is considered a major reason for physician shortages in the country.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study drawing upon the 'role strain' theory to explore the views of final-year medical students from four medical colleges in Karachi, Pakistan, on female graduates not entering the medical field. Data were obtained through 20 individual in-depth interviews and two focus group discussions. Themes were developed inductively from the data using the constant comparison method.
RESULTS: Pakistani parents actively channel daughters into medical education, considering medicine to be the most 'respectable' field. However, in a patrilocal society with norms of early, arranged marriages for daughters, there is a significant influence of in-laws and a husband on a woman's professional future. Parents perceive the medical degree as a 'safety net' should something go wrong with the marriage, rather than a step toward a medical career. Female respondents experience significant role conflict between their socially rooted gender roles as homemakers and mothers and their careers in medicine. Postgraduate training systems that are unfriendly to women provide further deterrents for women wishing to work. Contrary to popular belief, women not practising medicine is not the sole contributor to physician shortages. A significant factor appears to be male graduates migrating abroad for better training and financial prospects.
CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of traditional cultural values, including entrenched gender roles in society, deters women from practising medicine. To enable greater participation of women in the medical field, steps are required that will allow women to better manage family and work conflicts.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29508422     DOI: 10.1111/medu.13545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  5 in total

1.  Gender discrimination against female surgeons: A cross-sectional study in a lower-middle-income country.

Authors:  Mahin B Janjua; Hina Inam; Russell S Martins; Nida Zahid; Abida K Sattar; Shaista M Khan; Sadaf Khan; Aneela Darbar; Nuzhat Faruqui; Sharmeen Akram; Syed A Enam; Adil H Haider; Mahim A Malik
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24

2.  Current Challenges of Digital Health Interventions in Pakistan: Mixed Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Abdul Momin Kazi; Saad Ahmed Qazi; Lampros K Stergioulas; Nazia Ahsan; Sadori Khawaja; Fareeha Sameen; Muhammad Saqib; Muhammad Ayub Khan Mughal; Zabin Wajidali; Sikander Ali; Rao Moueed Ahmed; Hussain Kalimuddin; Yasir Rauf; Fatima Mahmood; Saad Zafar; Tufail Ahmad Abbasi; Khalil-Ur-Rahmen Khoumbati; Munir A Abbasi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  The Professional Identity and Career Attitude of Chinese Medical Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey in China.

Authors:  Xingjie Yang; Lan Gao; Suoyuan Zhang; Libin Zhang; Ligang Zhang; Shuangjiang Zhou; Meng Qi; Jingxu Chen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.157

4.  Gender discrimination in surgical oncology: An in-house appraisal.

Authors:  Saneya Pandrowala; Shraddha Patkar; Deepa Nair; Amita Maheshwari; C S Pramesh; Ajay Puri
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-12

5.  What Should Be Taught and What Is Taught: Integrating Gender into Medical and Health Professions Education for Medical and Nursing Students.

Authors:  Hsing-Chen Yang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.