Literature DB >> 29508417

Some methods for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation in high dimensions.

Scott Powers1, Junyang Qian1, Kenneth Jung2, Alejandro Schuler2, Nigam H Shah2, Trevor Hastie1, Robert Tibshirani1.   

Abstract

When devising a course of treatment for a patient, doctors often have little quantitative evidence on which to base their decisions, beyond their medical education and published clinical trials. Stanford Health Care alone has millions of electronic medical records that are only just recently being leveraged to inform better treatment recommendations. These data present a unique challenge because they are high dimensional and observational. Our goal is to make personalized treatment recommendations based on the outcomes for past patients similar to a new patient. We propose and analyze 3 methods for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using observational data. Our methods perform well in simulations using a wide variety of treatment effect functions, and we present results of applying the 2 most promising methods to data from The SPRINT Data Analysis Challenge, from a large randomized trial of a treatment for high blood pressure.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  causal inference; machine learning; personalized medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29508417      PMCID: PMC5938172          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  11 in total

1.  A Simple Method for Estimating Interactions between a Treatment and a Large Number of Covariates.

Authors:  Lu Tian; Ash A Alizadeh; Andrew J Gentles; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  On Bayesian methods of exploring qualitative interactions for targeted treatment.

Authors:  Wei Chen; Debashis Ghosh; Trivellore E Raghunathan; Maxim Norkin; Daniel J Sargent; Gerold Bepler
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Probability machines: consistent probability estimation using nonparametric learning machines.

Authors:  J D Malley; J Kruppa; A Dasgupta; K G Malley; A Ziegler
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Optimisation of antihypertensive treatment by crossover rotation of four major classes.

Authors:  J E Dickerson; A D Hingorani; M J Ashby; C R Palmer; M J Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data.

Authors:  Yu Xie; Jennie E Brand; Ben Jann
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2012-08

6.  Patterns of treatment effects in subsets of patients in clinical trials.

Authors:  Marco Bonetti; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets.

Authors:  M Gail; R Simon
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Estimating Individualized Treatment Rules Using Outcome Weighted Learning.

Authors:  Yingqi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; A John Rush; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.

Authors:  Jackson T Wright; Jeff D Williamson; Paul K Whelton; Joni K Snyder; Kaycee M Sink; Michael V Rocco; David M Reboussin; Mahboob Rahman; Suzanne Oparil; Cora E Lewis; Paul L Kimmel; Karen C Johnson; David C Goff; Lawrence J Fine; Jeffrey A Cutler; William C Cushman; Alfred K Cheung; Walter T Ambrosius
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.923

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Personalized evidence based medicine: predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects.

Authors:  David M Kent; Ewout Steyerberg; David van Klaveren
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-12-10

2.  Performing an Informatics Consult: Methods and Challenges.

Authors:  Alejandro Schuler; Alison Callahan; Kenneth Jung; Nigam H Shah
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Estimation and Validation of Ratio-based Conditional Average Treatment Effects Using Observational Data.

Authors:  Steve Yadlowsky; Fabio Pellegrini; Federica Lionetto; Stefan Braune; Lu Tian
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Patient Selection for Intensive Blood Pressure Management Based on Benefit and Adverse Events.

Authors:  Adam P Bress; Tom Greene; Catherine G Derington; Jincheng Shen; Yizhe Xu; Yiyi Zhang; Jian Ying; Brandon K Bellows; William C Cushman; Paul K Whelton; Nicholas M Pajewski; David Reboussin; Srinivasan Beddu; Rachel Hess; Jennifer S Herrick; Zugui Zhang; Paul Kolm; Robert W Yeh; Sanjay Basu; William S Weintraub; Andrew E Moran
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Applying methods for personalized medicine to the treatment of alcohol use disorder.

Authors:  Alena Kuhlemeier; Yasin Desai; Alexandra Tonigan; Katie Witkiewitz; Thomas Jaki; Yu-Yu Hsiao; Chi Chang; M Lee Van Horn
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2021-04

6.  Assessment of heterogeneous treatment effect estimation accuracy via matching.

Authors:  Zijun Gao; Trevor Hastie; Robert Tibshirani
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.497

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence in Health in 2018: New Opportunities, Challenges, and Practical Implications.

Authors:  Gretchen Jackson; Jianying Hu
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2019-08-16

8.  Generalizability of heterogeneous treatment effects based on causal forests applied to two randomized clinical trials of intensive glycemic control.

Authors:  Sridharan Raghavan; Kevin Josey; Gideon Bahn; Domenic Reda; Sanjay Basu; Seth A Berkowitz; Nicholas Emanuele; Peter Reaven; Debashis Ghosh
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.797

9.  Measuring individual benefits of psychiatric treatment using longitudinal binary outcomes: Application to antipsychotic benefits in non-cannabis and cannabis users.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Jose de Leon; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro; Francisco J Diaz
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 1.503

Review 10.  Predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects: a scoping review.

Authors:  Alexandros Rekkas; Jessica K Paulus; Gowri Raman; John B Wong; Ewout W Steyerberg; Peter R Rijnbeek; David M Kent; David van Klaveren
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.