Pan Fang1,2, Jia Lu1,2, Ying-Hong Liu1,2, Hong-Mei Deng1,2, Lei Zhang1,2, Hong-Qing Zhang3,4. 1. Department of Nephrology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. 2. Institute of Nephrology, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. 3. Department of Nephrology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. zhqgf2005@csu.edu.cn. 4. Institute of Nephrology, Central South University, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. zhqgf2005@csu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Peritonitis, which is one of the leading complications of peritoneal dialysis (PD) worldwide, severely affected morbidity and mortality of the PD patients. Although many efforts have been made to prevent PD-related peritonitis, it seems impossible to prevent it completely. Many causes have been reported to lead to peritonitis, and contamination during bag exchange is one of the important risk factors for peritonitis. METHODS: Here, we introduce an operating vehicle, which we invented to provide a sterile and safe space for bag exchange. A single-center, retrospective, case-control study was undertaken to determine whether this operating vehicle has a protective role in preventing peritonitis. In total, 462 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients were included in this study from October 2014 to March 2017. According to their personal will, these patients chose to use operating vehicle or traditional method during their bag exchange. The demographic, clinical and laboratory data of these patients in the two groups were collected, analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Of 462 patients with home dialysis, operating vehicle group consisted of 61 patients, and control group consisted of 401 patients. In the control group, over 677 patient-years, peritonitis occurred in 69 of 401 patients (17.2%), while in the operating vehicle group, over 60 patient-years, only 4 of 61 patients (6.6%) had episodes of peritonitis. The number of patients suffered from peritonitis was significantly decreased in the operating vehicle group (P = 0.034). Besides, there were a total of 99 episodes of peritonitis, and the rate was 1 episode every 7.2 patient-years in control group and 1 episode every 12 patient-years in the operating vehicle group. There was significant difference between the two groups (0.013). Positive dialysate cultures were obtained in majority of the peritonitis episodes (60.6%). CONCLUSION: Operating vehicle might help to reduce PD-related peritonitis by preventing contamination during bag exchange. Further studies are still needed to demonstrate the protective role of the operating vehicle in preventing peritonitis.
BACKGROUND:Peritonitis, which is one of the leading complications of peritoneal dialysis (PD) worldwide, severely affected morbidity and mortality of the PDpatients. Although many efforts have been made to prevent PD-related peritonitis, it seems impossible to prevent it completely. Many causes have been reported to lead to peritonitis, and contamination during bag exchange is one of the important risk factors for peritonitis. METHODS: Here, we introduce an operating vehicle, which we invented to provide a sterile and safe space for bag exchange. A single-center, retrospective, case-control study was undertaken to determine whether this operating vehicle has a protective role in preventing peritonitis. In total, 462 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients were included in this study from October 2014 to March 2017. According to their personal will, these patients chose to use operating vehicle or traditional method during their bag exchange. The demographic, clinical and laboratory data of these patients in the two groups were collected, analyzed and compared. RESULTS: Of 462 patients with home dialysis, operating vehicle group consisted of 61 patients, and control group consisted of 401 patients. In the control group, over 677 patient-years, peritonitis occurred in 69 of 401 patients (17.2%), while in the operating vehicle group, over 60 patient-years, only 4 of 61 patients (6.6%) had episodes of peritonitis. The number of patients suffered from peritonitis was significantly decreased in the operating vehicle group (P = 0.034). Besides, there were a total of 99 episodes of peritonitis, and the rate was 1 episode every 7.2 patient-years in control group and 1 episode every 12 patient-years in the operating vehicle group. There was significant difference between the two groups (0.013). Positive dialysate cultures were obtained in majority of the peritonitis episodes (60.6%). CONCLUSION: Operating vehicle might help to reduce PD-related peritonitis by preventing contamination during bag exchange. Further studies are still needed to demonstrate the protective role of the operating vehicle in preventing peritonitis.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bag exchange; Operating vehicle; Peritoneal dialysis; Peritonitis; Preventing infection
Authors: Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Beth Piraino; Judith Bernardini; Ana E Figueiredo; Amit Gupta; David W Johnson; Ed J Kuijper; Wai-Choong Lye; William Salzer; Franz Schaefer; Dirk G Struijk Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Beth Piraino; Javier de Arteaga; Stanley Fan; Ana E Figueiredo; Douglas N Fish; Eric Goffin; Yong-Lim Kim; William Salzer; Dirk G Struijk; Isaac Teitelbaum; David W Johnson Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 1.756