F Baggi1, Luiz Felipe Nevola Teixeira2, S Gandini3, M C Simoncini1, E Bonacossa1, F Sandrin1, M Sciotto Marotta1, G Lanni1, P Dadda1, D Colpani1, A Luini4. 1. Physiotherapy Department, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy. 2. Physiotherapy Department, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy. luizfelipe.nevolateixeira@ieo.it. 3. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy. 4. Breast Surgery Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical procedure for breast cancer is not without its side effects and one such side effect is axillary web syndrome (AWS), characterized by palpable fibrotic-like cords in the operated arm. As physical evaluation is the only gold standard method used, our study aims to assess the incidence and early detection of AWS with a self-assessment questionnaire. METHODS: From July 2013 to July 2014, 370 breast cancer patients were enrolled. AWS incidence was 51.1%, with 94.1% onset in the first 4 weeks after surgery; 43.5% of the patients did not recover in the first 8 weeks. Univariate analysis showed that BMI (P < 0.001), age (P < 0.001), educational level (P = 0.01), and exercise frequency in the eighth week of follow-up (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with the AWS detection, and multivariate analyses confirmed that younger patients (age < 50) have significantly higher AWS detection (OR = 2.38 (95%CI 1.53, 3.71) and that BMI is associated with AWS, with normal weight patients (BMI ≤ 25) having a significantly greater AWS detection with an odds ratio of 2.11 (95%CI 1.33, 3.36). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that the incidence of AWS is high in breast cancer patients, particularly in the first month after surgery. Not all patients achieved recovery during our 8 week follow-up, suggesting that evaluation and treatment should be longer. Double AWS detection was found for patients who were younger (age < 50) and with normal weight.
BACKGROUND: Surgical procedure for breast cancer is not without its side effects and one such side effect is axillary web syndrome (AWS), characterized by palpable fibrotic-like cords in the operated arm. As physical evaluation is the only gold standard method used, our study aims to assess the incidence and early detection of AWS with a self-assessment questionnaire. METHODS: From July 2013 to July 2014, 370 breast cancerpatients were enrolled. AWS incidence was 51.1%, with 94.1% onset in the first 4 weeks after surgery; 43.5% of the patients did not recover in the first 8 weeks. Univariate analysis showed that BMI (P < 0.001), age (P < 0.001), educational level (P = 0.01), and exercise frequency in the eighth week of follow-up (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with the AWS detection, and multivariate analyses confirmed that younger patients (age < 50) have significantly higher AWS detection (OR = 2.38 (95%CI 1.53, 3.71) and that BMI is associated with AWS, with normal weight patients (BMI ≤ 25) having a significantly greater AWS detection with an odds ratio of 2.11 (95%CI 1.33, 3.36). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicated that the incidence of AWS is high in breast cancerpatients, particularly in the first month after surgery. Not all patients achieved recovery during our 8 week follow-up, suggesting that evaluation and treatment should be longer. Double AWS detection was found for patients who were younger (age < 50) and with normal weight.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast neoplasms; Breast reconstruction; Lymph node dissection; Physiotherapy; Rehabilitation
Authors: Bernard Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Edwin R Fisher; Norman Wolmark Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anke Bergmann; Valéria Vasconcellos Mendes; Ricardo de Almeida Dias; Blenda do Amaral E Silva; Maria Giseli da Costa Leite Ferreira; Erica Alves Nogueira Fabro Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-10-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: O Leduc; M Sichere; A Moreau; J Rigolet; A Tinlot; S Darc; F Wilputte; J Strapart; T Parijs; A Clément; T Snoeck; F Pastouret; A Leduc Journal: Lymphology Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 1.286
Authors: Bárbara Reis Wariss; Rejane Medeiros Costa; Ana Carolina Padula Ribeiro Pereira; Rosalina Jorge Koifman; Anke Bergmann Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-10-04 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: A Gabriella Wernicke; Michael Shamis; Kulbir K Sidhu; Bruce C Turner; Yevgenyia Goltser; Imraan Khan; Paul J Christos; Lydia T Komarnicky-Kocher Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Margaret L McNeely; Kristin Campbell; Maria Ospina; Brian H Rowe; Kelly Dabbs; Terry P Klassen; John Mackey; Kerry Courneya Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2010-06-16
Authors: Karol Ramírez-Parada; Diana Garay-Acevedo; Williams Mella-Abarca; Militza Petric-Guajardo; César Sánchez-Rojel; Margaret L McNeely; Ivana Leao-Ribeiro; Rodrigo Fernández-Verdejo Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Linda Koehler; Amanda Day; David Hunter; Anne Blaes; Tufia Haddad; Ryan Shanley Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2022-04-06 Impact factor: 4.060