R Schniepp1,2, J C Boerner2, J Decker2, K Jahn1,3, T Brandt1,4, Max Wuehr5. 1. German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 2. Department of Neurology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 3. Schön Klinik Bad Aibling, Bad Aibling, Germany. 4. Institute for Clinical Neuroscience, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 5. German Center for Vertigo and Balance Disorders, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Max.Wuehr@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the mechanism underlying previously reported ameliorating effects of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on balance performance in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP) and determine those patients (incomplete versus complete vestibular loss) that might benefit from this intervention. METHODS: Vestibulospinal reflex thresholds were determined in 12 patients with BVP [2 with complete loss (cBVP) and 10 with residual function (rBVP)]. Patients were stimulated with 1 Hz sinusoidal GVS of increasing amplitudes (0-1.9 mA). Coherence between GVS input and stimulation-induced body motion was determined and psychometric function fits were subsequently used to determine individual vestibulospinal reflex thresholds. The procedure was repeated with an additional application of imperceptible white noise GVS (nGVS). RESULTS: All patients with rBVP but none with cBVP exhibited stimulation-induced vestibulospinal reflex responses with a mean threshold level of 1.26 ± 0.08 mA. Additional nGVS resulted in improved processing of weak subthreshold vestibular stimuli (p = 0.015) and thereby effectively decreased the vestibulospinal threshold in 90% of patients with rBVP (mean reduction 17.3 ± 3.9%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present findings allow to identify the mechanism by which nGVS appears to stabilize stance and gait performance in patients with BVP. Accordingly, nGVS effectively lowers the vestibular threshold to elicit balance-related reflexes that are required to adequately regulate postural equilibrium. This intervention is only effective in the presence of a residual vestibular functionality, which, however, applies for the majority of patients with BVP. Low-intensity noise stimulation thereby provides a non-invasive treatment option to optimize residual vestibular resources in BVP.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the mechanism underlying previously reported ameliorating effects of noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) on balance performance in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP) and determine those patients (incomplete versus complete vestibular loss) that might benefit from this intervention. METHODS: Vestibulospinal reflex thresholds were determined in 12 patients with BVP [2 with complete loss (cBVP) and 10 with residual function (rBVP)]. Patients were stimulated with 1 Hz sinusoidal GVS of increasing amplitudes (0-1.9 mA). Coherence between GVS input and stimulation-induced body motion was determined and psychometric function fits were subsequently used to determine individual vestibulospinal reflex thresholds. The procedure was repeated with an additional application of imperceptible white noise GVS (nGVS). RESULTS: All patients with rBVP but none with cBVP exhibited stimulation-induced vestibulospinal reflex responses with a mean threshold level of 1.26 ± 0.08 mA. Additional nGVS resulted in improved processing of weak subthreshold vestibular stimuli (p = 0.015) and thereby effectively decreased the vestibulospinal threshold in 90% of patients with rBVP (mean reduction 17.3 ± 3.9%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present findings allow to identify the mechanism by which nGVS appears to stabilize stance and gait performance in patients with BVP. Accordingly, nGVS effectively lowers the vestibular threshold to elicit balance-related reflexes that are required to adequately regulate postural equilibrium. This intervention is only effective in the presence of a residual vestibular functionality, which, however, applies for the majority of patients with BVP. Low-intensity noise stimulation thereby provides a non-invasive treatment option to optimize residual vestibular resources in BVP.
Authors: Max Wuehr; Eva Nusser; Julian Decker; Siegbert Krafczyk; Andreas Straube; Thomas Brandt; Klaus Jahn; Roman Schniepp Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: A Flores; S Manilla; N Huidobro; B De la Torre-Valdovinos; R Kristeva; I Mendez-Balbuena; F Galindo; M Treviño; E Manjarrez Journal: Neuroscience Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 3.590
Authors: Vera Carina Zingler; Eva Weintz; Klaus Jahn; Doreen Huppert; Christian Cnyrim; Thomas Brandt; Michael Strupp Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: V C Zingler; E Weintz; K Jahn; A Mike; D Huppert; N Rettinger; T Brandt; M Strupp Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2007-07-17 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Herman Kingma; Lilian Felipe; Marie-Cecile Gerards; Peter Gerits; Nils Guinand; Angelica Perez-Fornos; Vladimir Demkin; Raymond van de Berg Journal: J Neurol Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 4.849