Literature DB >> 29508034

Evaluation of on-line concentration coupled to liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry for the quantification of neonicotinoids and fipronil in surface water and tap water.

Juan Manuel Montiel-León1, Sung Vo Duy1, Gabriel Munoz1, Marc Amyot2, Sébastien Sauvé3.   

Abstract

A study was initiated to investigate a fast and reliable method for the determination of selected systemic insecticides in water matrixes and to evaluate potential sources of bias in their analysis. Acetamiprid, clothianidin, desnitro-imidacloprid, dinotefuran, fipronil, imidacloprid, nitenpyram, thiacloprid, and thiamethoxam were amenable to analysis via on-line sample enrichment hyphenated to ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. The selection of on-line solid-phase extraction parameters was dictated by a multicriterion desirability approach. A 2-mL on-line injection volume with a 1500 μL min-1 loading flow rate met the objectives sought in terms of chromatographic requirements, extraction efficiency, sensitivity, and precision. A total analysis time of 8 min per sample was obtained with method limits of detection in the range of 0.1-5 ng L-1 for the scope of targeted analytes. Automation at the sample concentration step yielded intraday and interday precisions in the range of 1-23 and 2-26%, respectively. Factors that could affect the whole method accuracy were further evaluated in matrix-specific experiments. The impact of the initial filtration step on analyte recovery was evaluated in ultra-pure water, tap water, and surface water. Out of the nine membranes tested, glass fiber filters and polyester filters appeared as the most appropriate materials. Sample storage stability was also investigated across the three matrix types; the targeted analytes displayed suitable stability during 28 days at either 4 °C or - 20 °C, with little deviations (± 10%) with respect to the initial T0 concentration. Method applicability was demonstrated in a range of tap water and surface water samples from the province of Québec, Canada. Results from the present survey indicated a predominance of thiamethoxam (< 0.5-10 and 3-61 ng L-1 in tap water and river water, respectively), clothianidin (< 0.5-6 and 2-88 ng L-1 in tap water and river water, respectively), and imidacloprid (< 0.1-1 and 0.8-38 ng L-1 in tap water and river water, respectively) among the targeted analytes. Graphical abstract ᅟ Development of solid-phase extraction coupled on-line to UHPLC-MS/MS for the rapid screening of systemic insecticides in water.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Filtration; Neonicotinoids; On-line solid-phase extraction; Storage stability; Systemic pesticides; Water analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29508034     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-0957-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  4 in total

1.  Exposure to neonicotinoid insecticides in the U.S. general population: Data from the 2015-2016 national health and nutrition examination survey.

Authors:  Maria Ospina; Lee-Yang Wong; Samuel E Baker; Amanda Bishop Serafim; Pilar Morales-Agudelo; Antonia M Calafat
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Data supporting the optimization of liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry conditions to analyze EPA-priority hormones and bisphenol A in water samples.

Authors:  Ken Goeury; Sung Vo Duy; Gabriel Munoz; Michèle Prévost; Sébastien Sauvé
Journal:  Data Brief       Date:  2019-04-26

3.  Nanofibrous Online Solid-Phase Extraction Coupled with Liquid Chromatography for the Determination of Neonicotinoid Pesticides in River Waters.

Authors:  Ivana H Šrámková; Burkhard Horstkotte; Laura Carbonell-Rozas; Jakub Erben; Jiří Chvojka; Francisco J Lara; Ana M García-Campaña; Dalibor Šatínský
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-24

4.  Analysis of the neurotoxin β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA) and isomers in surface water by FMOC derivatization liquid chromatography high resolution mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Sung Vo Duy; Gabriel Munoz; Quoc Tuc Dinh; Dat Tien Do; Dana F Simon; Sébastien Sauvé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.