| Literature DB >> 29507341 |
Yaxin Zhu1, Jie Liu2, Yucun Chen3, Ruochen Zhang1, Bo Qu4.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to explore the relation of various factors with unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) and provide some insight for HIV intervention on Chinese men who have sex with men (MSM). The current cross-sectional study recruited 365 MSM in Dalian, China. More than half of the respondents (117 respondents, 51.8% of the sample) had engaged in UAI. The multivariable logistic regression model suggested that poorer mental health (AOR: 7.16; 95% CI: 3.14-16.31), self-stigma (AOR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.00-2.34), and experience(s) of physical abuse in childhood (AOR: 5.85; 95% CI: 1.77-19.30) were significantly and positively related to UAI. Community engagement was negatively associated with UAI (p < 0.05). It appears it is necessary to incorporate mental health services, eliminate the stigma against homosexuality, and facilitate MSM-related community engagement into intervention strategies to prevent UAI among Chinese MSM. Targeted UAI interventions in the subgroup with a history of childhood physical abuse should also be of great concern.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29507341 PMCID: PMC5838107 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22403-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Simple logistic analysis of socio-demographic characteristics and anal sex role associated with UAI among Chinese MSM (n = 342).
| Characteristic | Total n (%) | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| <=25 | 140 (40.9%) | 1 |
| 26–35 | 147 (43.0%) | 0.56 (0.35–0.90)* |
| 36–44 | 39 (11.4%) | 0.61 (0.30–1.24) |
| >=45 | 16 (4.7%) | 2.12 (0.65–6.91) |
|
| ||
| Middle school and below | 100 (29.2%) | 1 |
| Secondary technical school or high school | 146 (42.7%) | 0.43 (0.25–0.72)* |
| College and above | 96 (28.1%) | 0.61 (0.35–1.08) |
|
| ||
| <2000 | 109 (31.9%) | 1 |
| 2000–3000 | 155 (45.3%) | 1.17 (0.72–1.91) |
| >3000 | 78 (22.8%) | 1.50 (0.83–2.69) |
|
| ||
| Single | 262 (76.6%) | 1 |
| Married | 51 (14.9%) | 1.24 (0.68–2.26) |
| Divorced | 29 (8.5%) | 1.93 (0.86–4.31) |
|
| ||
| Insertive | 142 (41.5%) | 1 |
| Receptive | 106 (31.0%) | 0.93 (0.56–1.53) |
| Versatile | 94 (27.5%) | 1.41 (0.83–2.39) |
*p < 0.05; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; MSM: men who have sex with men.
Descriptive statistics of GHQ-12 among Chinese MSM (n = 342).
| Seldom/Not at all | Usual/More than usual | |
|---|---|---|
| Able to concentrate* | 54 (15.8%) | 288 (84.2%) |
| Lost much sleep | 275 (80.4%) | 67 (19.6%) |
| Playing a useful part* | 115 (33.6%) | 227 (66.4%) |
| Capable of making decisions* | 133 (38.9%) | 209 (61.1%) |
| Under stress | 173 (50.6%) | 169 (49.4%) |
| Could not overcome difficulties | 250 (73.1%) | 92 (26.9%) |
| Enjoy normal activities* | 55 (16.1%) | 287 (83.9) |
| Face up to problems* | 52 (15.2%) | 290 (84.8) |
| Feeling unhappy and depressed | 189 (55.3%) | 153 (44.7%) |
| Losing confidence | 191 (55.8%) | 151 (44.2%) |
| Thinking of oneself as worthless | 188 (55.0%) | 154 (45.0%) |
| Feeling reasonably happy* | 170 (49.7%) | 172 (50.3%) |
*Six positively worded items; MSM: men who have sex with men.
Descriptive statistics of SSS-S among Chinese MSM (n = 342).
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Affective dimension | 2.46 ± 0.80 |
| I fear that others would know that I am a MSM. | 3.01 ± 1.09 |
| I feel helpless because I am a MSM. | 2.21 ± 1.03 |
| I feel uncomfortable because I am a MSM. | 2.18 ± 1.02 |
| Behavioural dimension | 2.14 ± 1.03 |
| I dare not to make new friends lest they find out that I am a MSM. | 2.09 ± 1.06 |
| I estrange myself from others because I am a MSM. | 2.16 ± 1.05 |
| I avoid interacting with others because I am a MSM. | 2.18 ± 1.05 |
| Cognitive dimension | 2.16 ± 1.01 |
| The identity of being a man who has sex with men taints my life. | 2.14 ± 1.03 |
| My identity as a MSM incurs inconvenience in my daily life. | 2.17 ± 1.03 |
| My identity as a MSM is a burden to me. | 2.17 ± 1.04 |
| Mean Self-stigma | 2.26 ± 0.91 |
MSM: men who have sex with men; SD: standard deviation.
Simple and multivariable logistic regression analysis of factors associated with UAI among Chinese MSM (n = 342).
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| GHQ <4 | 173 (50.6%) | 1 | 1 |
| GHQ >=4 | 169 (49.4%) | 2.09 (1.36–3.21)* | 7.16 (3.14–16.31)* |
|
| |||
| Affective dimensionc | — | 1.58 (1.19–2.08)* | — |
| Behavioural dimensiond | — | 1.44 (1.16–1.78)* | — |
| Cognitive dimensione | — | 1.45 (1.17–1.80)* | — |
| Mean Self-stigma | — | 1.53 (1.20–1.96)* | 1.53 (1.00–2.34)* |
|
| |||
| Psychological abuse | |||
| No | 299 (87.4%) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 43 (12.6%) | 2.11 (1.07–4.16)* | 0.71 (0.26–1.95) |
| Physical abuse | |||
| No | 306 (89.5%) | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 36 (10.5%) | 3.69 (1.63–8.35)* | 5.85(1.77–19.30)* |
|
| — | 0.73 (0.57–0.93)* | 0.74 (0.51–1.08) |
|
| |||
| Number of CBO affiliations | |||
| 0 | 95 (27.8%) | 1 | 1 |
| 1 | 169 (49.4%) | 0.16 (0.09–0.30)* | 0.08 (0.04–0.17)* |
| >=2 | 78 (22.8%) | 0.06 (0.03–0.13)* | 0.04 (0.01–0.09)* |
| Frequency of community activity engagement | |||
| Never | 89 (26.0%) | 1 | 1 |
| Occasionally | 122 (35.7%) | 0.58 (0.33–1.02) | 0.48 (0.21–1.06) |
| Always | 131 (38.3%) | 0.35 (0.20–0.61)* | 0.19 (0.08–0.45)* |
aSimple logistic regression model. bMultivariable logistic regression model. SSS-S: Self-Stigma Scale–Short Form; MSM: men who have sex with men; CBO: community-based organization; COR: crude odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; AOR = adjusted odds ratio, odds ratio adjusted by significant background variables (educational level and marital status).
*p < 0.05.