Literature DB >> 29507238

Matching material and cellular timescales maximizes cell spreading on viscoelastic substrates.

Ze Gong1,2,3, Spencer E Szczesny4, Steven R Caliari5,6,7, Elisabeth E Charrier8, Ovijit Chaudhuri9, Xuan Cao1,3, Yuan Lin10, Robert L Mauck3,4, Paul A Janmey3,8, Jason A Burdick3,7, Vivek B Shenoy11,3,7.   

Abstract

Recent evidence has shown that, in addition to rigidity, the viscous response of the extracellular matrix (ECM) significantly affects the behavior and function of cells. However, the mechanism behind such mechanosensitivity toward viscoelasticity remains unclear. In this study, we systematically examined the dynamics of motor clutches (i.e., focal adhesions) formed between the cell and a viscoelastic substrate using analytical methods and direct Monte Carlo simulation. Interestingly, we observe that, for low ECM rigidity, maximum cell spreading is achieved at an optimal level of viscosity in which the substrate relaxation time falls between the timescale for clutch binding and its characteristic binding lifetime. That is, viscosity serves to stiffen soft substrates on a timescale faster than the clutch off-rate, which enhances cell-ECM adhesion and cell spreading. On the other hand, for substrates that are stiff, our model predicts that viscosity will not influence cell spreading, since the bound clutches are saturated by the elevated stiffness. The model was tested and validated using experimental measurements on three different material systems and explained the different observed effects of viscosity on each substrate. By capturing the mechanism by which substrate viscoelasticity affects cell spreading across a wide range of material parameters, our analytical model provides a useful tool for designing biomaterials that optimize cellular adhesion and mechanosensing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell spreading; focal adhesion; mechanotransduction; timescales; viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29507238      PMCID: PMC5866566          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1716620115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  36 in total

1.  Cells test substrate rigidity by local contractions on submicrometer pillars.

Authors:  Saba Ghassemi; Giovanni Meacci; Shuaimin Liu; Alexander A Gondarenko; Anurag Mathur; Pere Roca-Cusachs; Michael P Sheetz; James Hone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A Chemomechanical Model of Matrix and Nuclear Rigidity Regulation of Focal Adhesion Size.

Authors:  Xuan Cao; Yuan Lin; Tristian P Driscoll; Janusz Franco-Barraza; Edna Cukierman; Robert L Mauck; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Nuclear lamin-A scales with tissue stiffness and enhances matrix-directed differentiation.

Authors:  Joe Swift; Irena L Ivanovska; Amnon Buxboim; Takamasa Harada; P C Dave P Dingal; Joel Pinter; J David Pajerowski; Kyle R Spinler; Jae-Won Shin; Manorama Tewari; Florian Rehfeldt; David W Speicher; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cells as liquid motors: mechanosensitivity emerges from collective dynamics of actomyosin cortex.

Authors:  Jocelyn Étienne; Jonathan Fouchard; Démosthène Mitrossilis; Nathalie Bufi; Pauline Durand-Smet; Atef Asnacios
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Multiscale model predicts increasing focal adhesion size with decreasing stiffness in fibrous matrices.

Authors:  Xuan Cao; Ehsan Ban; Brendon M Baker; Yuan Lin; Jason A Burdick; Christopher S Chen; Vivek B Shenoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission.

Authors:  Raimon Sunyer; Vito Conte; Jorge Escribano; Alberto Elosegui-Artola; Anna Labernadie; Léo Valon; Daniel Navajas; José Manuel García-Aznar; José J Muñoz; Pere Roca-Cusachs; Xavier Trepat
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  Integration of actin dynamics and cell adhesion by a three-dimensional, mechanosensitive molecular clutch.

Authors:  Lindsay B Case; Clare M Waterman
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Rational design of network properties in guest-host assembled and shear-thinning hyaluronic acid hydrogels.

Authors:  Christopher B Rodell; Adam L Kaminski; Jason A Burdick
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 6.988

9.  Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate.

Authors:  Britta Trappmann; Julien E Gautrot; John T Connelly; Daniel G T Strange; Yuan Li; Michelle L Oyen; Martien A Cohen Stuart; Heike Boehm; Bojun Li; Viola Vogel; Joachim P Spatz; Fiona M Watt; Wilhelm T S Huck
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 43.841

10.  Periodic lamellipodial contractions correlate with rearward actin waves.

Authors:  Grégory Giannone; Benjamin J Dubin-Thaler; Hans-Günther Döbereiner; Nelly Kieffer; Anne R Bresnick; Michael P Sheetz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  47 in total

1.  Fundamental Characteristics of Neuron Adhesion Revealed by Forced Peeling and Time-Dependent Healing.

Authors:  Haipei Liu; Chao Fang; Ze Gong; Raymond Chuen-Chung Chang; Jin Qian; Huajian Gao; Yuan Lin
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Extracellular matrix plasticity as a driver of cell spreading.

Authors:  Joshua M Grolman; Philipp Weinand; David J Mooney
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Biphasic mechanosensitivity of T cell receptor-mediated spreading of lymphocytes.

Authors:  Astrid Wahl; Céline Dinet; Pierre Dillard; Aya Nassereddine; Pierre-Henri Puech; Laurent Limozin; Kheya Sengupta
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Stiffness Sensing by Cells.

Authors:  Paul A Janmey; Daniel A Fletcher; Cynthia A Reinhart-King
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Spatiotemporal Control of Viscoelasticity in Phototunable Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels.

Authors:  Erica Hui; Kathryn I Gimeno; Grant Guan; Steven R Caliari
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 6.988

Review 6.  The matrix in cancer.

Authors:  Thomas R Cox
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Obesity-associated Adipose Stromal Cells Promote Breast Cancer Invasion Through Direct Cell Contact and ECM Remodeling.

Authors:  Lu Ling; Jeffrey A Mulligan; Yunxin Ouyang; Adrian A Shimpi; Rebecca M Williams; Garrett F Beeghly; Benjamin D Hopkins; Jason A Spector; Steven G Adie; Claudia Fischbach
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 18.808

8.  Hydrogel Micropost Arrays with Single Post Tunability to Study Cell Volume and Mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Daniel Devine; Vishwaarth Vijayakumar; Sing Wan Wong; Stephen Lenzini; Peter Newman; Jae-Won Shin
Journal:  Adv Biosyst       Date:  2020-10-14

Review 9.  Engineered Biomaterial Platforms to Study Fibrosis.

Authors:  Matthew D Davidson; Jason A Burdick; Rebecca G Wells
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 9.933

10.  Design of synthetic extracellular matrices for probing breast cancer cell growth using robust cyctocompatible nucleophilic thiol-yne addition chemistry.

Authors:  Laura J Macdougall; Katherine L Wiley; April M Kloxin; Andrew P Dove
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.