Literature DB >> 29506861

Prospective assessment of follicular growth and the oocyte cohort after ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation in 90 cancer patients versus 180 matched controls.

Christine Decanter1, Geoffroy Robin2, Audrey Mailliez3, Julien Sigala2, Franck Morschhauser4, Nassima Ramdane5, Patrick Devos5, Didier Dewailly6, Brigitte Leroy-Martin7, Laura Keller7.   

Abstract

A lower number of metaphase II oocytes eligible for vitrification after controlled stimulation in cancer patients has recently been reported, suggesting that cancer may impair the dynamics and quality of follicular growth. In this prospective, non-interventional study, the pattern of follicular growth and oocyte cohort after ovarian stimulation in cancer patients was analysed. Ninety cancer patients, recruited before starting chemotherapy, were compared with 180 time- and age-matched healthy controls undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Primary outcome was total number of metaphase II oocytes and metaphase II /total oocytes rate. Basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels (P < 0.05) and antral follicle count (P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in cancer patients. Recombinant FSH total dose was significantly higher in the cancer group (P < 0.0001). No differences were found in duration of stimulation, mean number of mature follicles on day of ovulation induction and total oocyte number after retrieval; the number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved (6.2 ± 4.7 versus 8.8 ± 4.2; P < 0.0001) and number of metaphase II oocytes-total oocytes ratio were significantly lower in cancer patients (56% versus 78%, P < 0.0001). Fewer metaphase II oocytes were eligible for vitrification and lower maturation rate in the cancer group.
Copyright © 2018 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Fertility preservation; Maturation rate; Oocyte quality; Oocyte vitrification; Ovarian response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29506861     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  3 in total

1.  The Effects of Negative Elements in Environment and Cancer on Female Reproductive System.

Authors:  Jiangxue Qu; Yuehan Li; Shujie Liao; Jie Yan
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Fertility after Cancer: Risks and Successes.

Authors:  Chiara Di Tucci; Giulia Galati; Giulia Mattei; Alessandra Chinè; Alice Fracassi; Ludovico Muzii
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Outcomes of ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation in breast cancer patients with different hormonal receptor profiles.

Authors:  Jacques Balayla; Togas Tulandi; William Buckett; Hananel Holzer; Naama Steiner; Guy Shrem; Alexander Volodarsky-Perel
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.412

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.