Literature DB >> 29506814

A simulated training model for laparoscopic pyloromyotomy: Is 3D printing the way of the future?

Andrew Williams1, Morgan McWilliam2, James Ahlin3, Jacob Davidson4, Mackenzie A Quantz5, Andreana Bütter6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is a common neonatal condition treated with open or laparoscopic pyloromyotomy. 3D-printed organs offer realistic simulations to practice surgical techniques. The purpose of this study was to validate a 3D HPS stomach model and assess model reliability and surgical realism.
METHODS: Medical students, general surgery residents, and adult and pediatric general surgeons were recruited from a single center. Participants were videotaped three times performing a laparoscopic pyloromyotomy using box trainers and 3D-printed stomachs. Attempts were graded independently by three reviewers using GOALS and Task Specific Assessments (TSA). Participants were surveyed using the Index of Agreement of Assertions on Model Accuracy (IAAMA).
RESULTS: Participants reported their experience levels as novice (22%), inexperienced (26%), intermediate (19%), and experienced (33%). Interrater reliability was similar for overall average GOALS and TSA scores. There was a significant improvement in GOALS (p<0.0001) and TSA scores (p=0.03) between attempts and overall. Participants felt the model accurately simulated a laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (82%) and would be a useful tool for beginners (100%).
CONCLUSION: A 3D-printed stomach model for simulated laparoscopic pyloromyotomy is a useful training tool for learners to improve laparoscopic skills. The GOALS and TSA provide reliable technical skills assessments. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printed; Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis; Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy; Simulation; Surgical Education

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29506814     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  5 in total

1.  A novel ex vivo trainer for robotic vesicourethral anastomosis.

Authors:  Kevin Shee; Kevin Koo; Xiaotian Wu; Fady M Ghali; Ryan J Halter; Elias S Hyams
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-01-28

2.  A do-it-yourself 3D-printed thoracic spine model for anesthesia resident simulation.

Authors:  Michelle Han; Alexandra A Portnova; Matthew Lester; Martha Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Training in endocrine surgery.

Authors:  Oliver Gimm; Marcin Barczyński; Radu Mihai; Marco Raffaelli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Anatomical Engineering and 3D Printing for Surgery and Medical Devices: International Review and Future Exponential Innovations.

Authors:  José Cornejo; Jorge A Cornejo-Aguilar; Mariela Vargas; Carlos G Helguero; Rafhael Milanezi de Andrade; Sebastian Torres-Montoya; Javier Asensio-Salazar; Alvaro Rivero Calle; Jaime Martínez Santos; Aaron Damon; Alfredo Quiñones-Hinojosa; Miguel D Quintero-Consuegra; Juan Pablo Umaña; Sebastian Gallo-Bernal; Manolo Briceño; Paolo Tripodi; Raul Sebastian; Paul Perales-Villarroel; Gabriel De la Cruz-Ku; Travis Mckenzie; Victor Sebastian Arruarana; Jiakai Ji; Laura Zuluaga; Daniela A Haehn; Albit Paoli; Jordan C Villa; Roxana Martinez; Cristians Gonzalez; Rafael J Grossmann; Gabriel Escalona; Ilaria Cinelli; Thais Russomano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Neurosurgical simulator for training aneurysm microsurgery-a user suitability study involving neurosurgeons and residents.

Authors:  Fredrick Johnson Joseph; Stefan Weber; Andreas Raabe; David Bervini
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.216

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.