Literature DB >> 29506744

Gender differences in electro-mechanical characteristics of left bundle branch block: Potential implications for selection and response of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Jan De Pooter1, Victor Kamoen2, Milad El Haddad2, Roland Stroobandt2, Marc De Buyzere2, Luc Jordaens2, Frank Timmermans2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Female patients are underrepresented in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) trials, although they show better CRT response compared to males and at shorter QRS durations. We hypothesized that differences in left bundle branch block (LBBB) characteristics and mechanical dyssynchrony might explain this gender disparity.
METHODS: Patients presenting with true LBBB-morphology (including mid-QRS notching) on surface electrocardiograms (ECG) were selected. LBBB QRS duration (QRSDLBBB) was measured automatically on the ECG. Left ventricular dimensions were assessed by two-dimensional echocardiography. Mechanical dyssynchrony was assessed by the presence of septal flash (SF) on echocardiography.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 1037 patients (428 females). Female LBBB patients had smaller QRSDLBBB compared to male LBBB patients (142 [22]ms versus 156 [24]ms, p<0.001). In a multivariate analysis, sex and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) were independent predictors of QRSDLBBB. QRSDLBBB can be corrected for sex and LVEDD using a simplified formula: corrected-QRSDLBBB=QRSDLBBB+0.5×(50-LVEDD)-10 (if male). SF was more prevalent in females compared to males (60% versus 43%, p<0.001). Women revealed significantly more SF in narrow QRSDLBBB groups compared to men: 65% versus 13% (p<0.001) with QRSDLBBB 120-129ms, 66% versus 18% (p<0.001) with QRSDLBBB 130-139ms and 63% versus 31% (p<0.001) with QRSDLBBB 140-149ms. At QRSDLBBB>150ms, there were no differences in SF prevalence between females and males.
CONCLUSION: Female patients show true LBBB morphology at shorter QRSD and have more frequent mechanical dyssynchrony at shorter QRSD compared to males. This might explain the better CRT response rates at shorter QRSD in females.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Gender; Left bundle branch block; Mechanical dyssynchrony

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29506744     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.10.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  4 in total

Review 1.  Re-evaluating the electro-vectorcardiographic criteria for left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Andrés Ricardo Pérez-Riera; Raimundo Barbosa-Barros; Rodrigo Daminello-Raimundo; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Marcos Célio de Almeida; Jani Rankinen; Fabio Baeub Soler; Kjell Nikus
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Sex-specific clinical outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy in left bundle branch block-associated idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy: A NEOLITH II substudy.

Authors:  Norman C Wang; Ure Mezu-Chukwu; Evan C Adelstein; Andrew D Althouse; Michael S Sharbaugh; Sandeep K Jain; Alaa A Shalaby; Andrew H Voigt; Samir Saba
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Aetiology of Heart Failure, Rather than Sex, Determines Reverse LV Remodelling Response to CRT.

Authors:  Fatema Said; Jozine M Ter Maaten; Pieter Martens; Kevin Vernooy; Mathias Meine; Cornelis P Allaart; Bastiaan Geelhoed; Marc A Vos; Maarten J Cramer; Isabelle C van Gelder; Wilfried Mullens; Michiel Rienstra; Alexander H Maass
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Major Left Bundle Branch Block and Coronary Heart Disease-Are There Any Differences between the Sexes?

Authors:  Diana Gurzău; Alexandra Dădârlat-Pop; Bogdan Caloian; Gabriel Cismaru; Horaţiu Comşa; Raluca Tomoaia; Dumitru Zdrenghea; Dana Pop
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.