Parita Patel1, Andres Yarur2, Sushila Dalal3, Atsuhi Sakuraba3, David T Rubin3, Stephen B Hanauer4, Ira Hanan3, Laura H Raffals5, Russell D Cohen3, Joel Pekow1,3. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, S Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL. 2. Department of Gastroenterology, Medical College of Wisconsin, W. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI. 3. Section of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medical Center, S Maryland Avenue, MC, Chicago, IL. 4. Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL. 5. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, SW, Rochester, MN.
Abstract
Background: IV ciclosporin therapy is effective in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The optimal drug level to achieve response and minimize complications during induction therapy is not known. Aim: The primary aim was to evaluate if serum ciclosporin drug levels are associated with increased risk of colectomy within 90 days of hospitalization. Secondary aims were to determine if ciclosporin levels are associated with avoidance of colectomy at 7 and 30 days, if ciclosporin levels are associated with drug-related and postoperative complications, and if patient-specific factors are associated with response to ciclosporin. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 81 hospitalized patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis treated with ciclosporin. Risk factors for colectomy within 7, 30, and 90 days, medication-specific and postoperative complications were compared by first, mean, and peak ciclosporin level during IV induction therapy. Results: There were 47 patients (58%) who underwent surgery. There were no differences between initial, mean, and peak ciclosporin levels among responders and nonresponders and treatment-related or postoperative complications. Responders within 90 days had lower C-reactive-protein levels (20mg/L vs. 38mg/L, P = 0.01), lower serum albumin concentrations (3.4g/dL vs. 3.7g/dL, P = 0.03), and higher rates of kidney injury (50% vs 17%, P = 0.002). Conclusion: Initial, mean, and peak serum levels of ciclosporin did not correlate with response or toxicity. However, C-reactive-protein levels levels and kidney injury may be helpful in predicting clinical response to ciclosporin.
Background: IV ciclosporin therapy is effective in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The optimal drug level to achieve response and minimize complications during induction therapy is not known. Aim: The primary aim was to evaluate if serum ciclosporin drug levels are associated with increased risk of colectomy within 90 days of hospitalization. Secondary aims were to determine if ciclosporin levels are associated with avoidance of colectomy at 7 and 30 days, if ciclosporin levels are associated with drug-related and postoperative complications, and if patient-specific factors are associated with response to ciclosporin. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 81 hospitalized patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis treated with ciclosporin. Risk factors for colectomy within 7, 30, and 90 days, medication-specific and postoperative complications were compared by first, mean, and peak ciclosporin level during IV induction therapy. Results: There were 47 patients (58%) who underwent surgery. There were no differences between initial, mean, and peak ciclosporin levels among responders and nonresponders and treatment-related or postoperative complications. Responders within 90 days had lower C-reactive-protein levels (20mg/L vs. 38mg/L, P = 0.01), lower serum albumin concentrations (3.4g/dL vs. 3.7g/dL, P = 0.03), and higher rates of kidney injury (50% vs 17%, P = 0.002). Conclusion: Initial, mean, and peak serum levels of ciclosporin did not correlate with response or toxicity. However, C-reactive-protein levels levels and kidney injury may be helpful in predicting clinical response to ciclosporin.
Authors: Paul Rutgeerts; William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Walter Reinisch; Allan Olson; Jewel Johanns; Suzanne Travers; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Stephen B Hanauer; Gary R Lichtenstein; Willem J S de Villiers; Daniel Present; Bruce E Sands; Jean Frédéric Colombel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-12-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E Domènech; E Garcia-Planella; I Bernal; M Rosinach; E Cabré; L Fluvià; J Boix; M A Gassull Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: B E Sands; W J Tremaine; W J Sandborn; P J Rutgeerts; S B Hanauer; L Mayer; S R Targan; D K Podolsky Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Gunnar Järnerot; Erik Hertervig; Ingalill Friis-Liby; Lars Blomquist; Per Karlén; Christer Grännö; Mogens Vilien; Magnus Ström; Ake Danielsson; Hans Verbaan; Per M Hellström; Anders Magnuson; Bengt Curman Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Gert Van Assche; Geert D'Haens; Maja Noman; Séverine Vermeire; Martin Hiele; Katrien Asnong; Joris Arts; Andre D'Hoore; Freddy Penninckx; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: S Lichtiger; D H Present; A Kornbluth; I Gelernt; J Bauer; G Galler; F Michelassi; S Hanauer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1994-06-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David Laharie; Arnaud Bourreille; Julien Branche; Matthieu Allez; Yoram Bouhnik; Jerome Filippi; Frank Zerbib; Guillaume Savoye; Maria Nachury; Jacques Moreau; Jean-Charles Delchier; Jacques Cosnes; Elena Ricart; Olivier Dewit; Antonio Lopez-Sanroman; Jean-Louis Dupas; Franck Carbonnel; Gilles Bommelaer; Benoit Coffin; Xavier Roblin; Gert Van Assche; Maria Esteve; Martti Färkkilä; Javier P Gisbert; Philippe Marteau; Stephane Nahon; Martine de Vos; Denis Franchimont; Jean-Yves Mary; Jean-Frederic Colombel; Marc Lémann Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-10-10 Impact factor: 79.321