Ellen S Deutsch1, Robert A Yonash2, Donald E Martin3, Joshua H Atkins4, Theresa V Arnold5, Christina M Hunt6. 1. Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority, 5200 Butler Pike, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462, USA. Electronic address: edeutsch@ecri.org. 2. Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority, 333 Market Street, Lobby Level, Harrisburg, PA 17120, USA. Electronic address: ryonash@pa.gov. 3. Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Penn State University Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. Electronic address: dem8778@gmail.com. 4. Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 680 Dulles Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: Joshua.Atkins@uphs.upenn.edu. 5. Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority, 5200 Butler Pike, Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462, USA. Electronic address: tarnold@ecri.org. 6. Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority, 333 Market Street, Lobby Level, Harrisburg, PA 17120, USA. Electronic address: cmhjgh@verizon.net.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Wrong-site nerve blocks (WSBs) are a significant, though rare, source of perioperative morbidity. WSBs constitute the most common type of perioperative wrong-site procedure reported to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority. This systematic literature review aggregates information about the incidence, patient consequences, and conditions that contribute to WSBs, as well as evidence-based methods to prevent them. DESIGN: A systematic search of English-language publications was performed, using the PRISMA process. MAIN RESULTS: Seventy English-language publications were identified. Analysis of four publications reporting on at least 10,000 blocks provides a rate of 0.52 to 5.07 WSB per 10,000 blocks, unilateral blocks, or "at risk" procedures. The most commonly mentioned potential consequence was local anesthetic toxicity. The most commonly mentioned contributory factors were time pressure, personnel factors, and lack of site-mark visibility (including no site mark placed). Components of the block process that were addressed include preoperative nerve-block verification, nerve-block site marking, time-outs, and the healthcare facility's structure and culture of safety. DISCUSSION: A lack of uniform reporting criteria and divergence in the data and theories presented may reflect the variety of circumstances affecting when and how nerve blocks are performed, as well as the infrequency of a WSB. However, multiple authors suggest three procedural steps that may help to prevent WSBs: (1) verify the nerve-block procedure using multiple sources of information, including the patient; (2) identify the nerve-block site with a visible mark; and (3) perform time-outs immediately prior to injection or instillation of the anesthetic. Hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, and anesthesiology practices should consider creating site-verification processes with clinician input and support to develop sustainable WSB-prevention practices.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Wrong-site nerve blocks (WSBs) are a significant, though rare, source of perioperative morbidity. WSBs constitute the most common type of perioperative wrong-site procedure reported to the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority. This systematic literature review aggregates information about the incidence, patient consequences, and conditions that contribute to WSBs, as well as evidence-based methods to prevent them. DESIGN: A systematic search of English-language publications was performed, using the PRISMA process. MAIN RESULTS: Seventy English-language publications were identified. Analysis of four publications reporting on at least 10,000 blocks provides a rate of 0.52 to 5.07 WSB per 10,000 blocks, unilateral blocks, or "at risk" procedures. The most commonly mentioned potential consequence was local anesthetic toxicity. The most commonly mentioned contributory factors were time pressure, personnel factors, and lack of site-mark visibility (including no site mark placed). Components of the block process that were addressed include preoperative nerve-block verification, nerve-block site marking, time-outs, and the healthcare facility's structure and culture of safety. DISCUSSION: A lack of uniform reporting criteria and divergence in the data and theories presented may reflect the variety of circumstances affecting when and how nerve blocks are performed, as well as the infrequency of a WSB. However, multiple authors suggest three procedural steps that may help to prevent WSBs: (1) verify the nerve-block procedure using multiple sources of information, including the patient; (2) identify the nerve-block site with a visible mark; and (3) perform time-outs immediately prior to injection or instillation of the anesthetic. Hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers, and anesthesiology practices should consider creating site-verification processes with clinician input and support to develop sustainable WSB-prevention practices.