Megan L Ranney1, Julie Bromberg2, Alyssa Hozey3, T Charles Casper4, Michael J Mello2, Anthony Spirito5, Thomas H Chun2, James G Linakis2. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Injury Prevention Center, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI. Electronic address: Megan_ranney@brown.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Injury Prevention Center, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI. 3. Injury Prevention Center, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI. 4. Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Problem behaviors, such as substance use and peer aggression, frequently coexist and are common among youth seen in emergency departments (EDs). EDs are increasingly urged to screen for both psychological distress and problem behaviors. OBJECTIVE: To inform screening and intervention efforts, we aimed to identify classes of problematic substance use and peer aggression in a sample of adolescents from 16 pediatric EDs, and to examine the relative prevalence of psychological distress in identified classes. METHODS: We completed a cross-sectional survey of youth (n = 5001) presenting for any reason to 16 pediatric EDs across the United States, with the use of validated measures of demographics, alcohol and substance use, and peer aggression. We used standard latent class analysis techniques to create behavioral risk classes of adolescents based on violence and substance use variables; then we conducted logistic regression to examine the relationship between psychological distress and the latent classes. RESULTS: Three classes of problem behaviors were identified: low-risk (few problem behaviors, 91.2% of sample), medium risk (high cigarette smoking; moderate violence, alcohol/substance use; 5.2%), and high risk (high levels of all problem behaviors, 3.5%). A significant directional association (P < .001) between worse psychological distress and higher-risk behavior classes was noted, even after adjusting for demographics. CONCLUSIONS: Youth seen in the ED for any reason who report higher levels of past-year substance use and peer aggression are significantly more likely to report negative mood symptoms. Targeted screening and interventions for this population may be indicated.
BACKGROUND: Problem behaviors, such as substance use and peer aggression, frequently coexist and are common among youth seen in emergency departments (EDs). EDs are increasingly urged to screen for both psychological distress and problem behaviors. OBJECTIVE: To inform screening and intervention efforts, we aimed to identify classes of problematic substance use and peer aggression in a sample of adolescents from 16 pediatric EDs, and to examine the relative prevalence of psychological distress in identified classes. METHODS: We completed a cross-sectional survey of youth (n = 5001) presenting for any reason to 16 pediatric EDs across the United States, with the use of validated measures of demographics, alcohol and substance use, and peer aggression. We used standard latent class analysis techniques to create behavioral risk classes of adolescents based on violence and substance use variables; then we conducted logistic regression to examine the relationship between psychological distress and the latent classes. RESULTS: Three classes of problem behaviors were identified: low-risk (few problem behaviors, 91.2% of sample), medium risk (high cigarette smoking; moderate violence, alcohol/substance use; 5.2%), and high risk (high levels of all problem behaviors, 3.5%). A significant directional association (P < .001) between worse psychological distress and higher-risk behavior classes was noted, even after adjusting for demographics. CONCLUSIONS: Youth seen in the ED for any reason who report higher levels of past-year substance use and peer aggression are significantly more likely to report negative mood symptoms. Targeted screening and interventions for this population may be indicated.
Authors: Rebecca M Cunningham; Stephen T Chermack; Marc A Zimmerman; Jean T Shope; C Raymond Bingham; Frederic C Blow; Maureen A Walton Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Megan L Ranney; Jason Goldstick; Andria Eisman; Patrick M Carter; Maureen Walton; Rebecca M Cunningham Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: Maureen A Walton; Stephen T Chermack; Jean T Shope; C Raymond Bingham; Marc A Zimmerman; Frederic C Blow; Rebecca M Cunningham Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: P W Fisher; D Shaffer; J C Piacentini; J Lapkin; V Kafantaris; H Leonard; D B Herzog Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 1993-05 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Vivek P Dubey; Kimberly A Randell; Abbey R Masonbrink; Michelle L Pickett; Ashley K Sherman; Megha Ramaswamy; Melissa K Miller Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2021-04-01 Impact factor: 6.314
Authors: Victoria Whitaker; Melissa Oldham; Jennifer Boyd; Hannah Fairbrother; Penny Curtis; Petra Meier; John Holmes Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-01-14 Impact factor: 3.295