Literature DB >> 29505670

Clinical and economic burden associated with stage III to IV triple-negative breast cancer: A SEER-Medicare historical cohort study in elderly women in the United States.

Kendra L Schwartz1,2, Michael S Simon2,3, Lauren C Bylsma4, Julie J Ruterbusch2,3, Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer2,3, Neil M Schultz5, Scott C Flanders5, Arie Barlev6, Jon P Fryzek7, Ruben G W Quek6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current study was performed to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns, survival, health care resource use (HRU), and costs among older women in the United States with advanced (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III/IV) triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database.
METHODS: Women who were aged ≥66 years at the time of diagnosis and diagnosed with advanced TNBC between January 1, 2007, and January 1, 2011, in the SEER-Medicare database and who were followed for survival through December 31, 2013, were eligible. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics at the time of diagnosis, subsequent treatment patterns, and survival outcomes were analyzed. HRU and costs for the first 3 months after diagnosis, the last 3 months of life, and the time in between are summarized. All analyses were stratified by American Joint Committee on Cancer stage of disease.
RESULTS: There were 1244 patients newly diagnosed with advanced TNBC; the majority were aged ≥75 years (61% with stage III disease and 57.4% with stage IV disease) and white (>70% of patients in both disease stage groups). The most common treatment approaches were surgery combined with chemotherapy for patients for stage III disease (50.6%) and chemotherapy alone or with radiotherapy for patients with stage IV disease (31.3%). Diverse chemotherapy regimens were administered for each line of therapy; nevertheless, the medications used were consistent with national guidelines. Patients with stage III and stage IV disease were found to have a similar mean number of hospitalizations and outpatient visits, but mean monthly costs were greater for patients with stage IV disease at all 3 time points. The mean cost per patient-month (in 2013 US dollars) was $4810 for patients with stage III disease and $9159 for patients with stage IV disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Among older women with advanced TNBC, significant treatment variations and considerable HRU and costs exist. Further research is needed to find effective treatments with which to reduce the clinical and economic burden of this disease. Cancer 2018;124:2104-14.
© 2018 American Cancer Society. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer treatment patterns; health care costs; health care resource use; survival; triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29505670      PMCID: PMC6849380          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  28 in total

1.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  National Health Expenditure Projections, 2016-25: Price Increases, Aging Push Sector To 20 Percent Of Economy.

Authors:  Sean P Keehan; Devin A Stone; John A Poisal; Gigi A Cuckler; Andrea M Sisko; Sheila D Smith; Andrew J Madison; Christian J Wolfe; Joseph M Lizonitz
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Patient survival and healthcare utilization costs after diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer in a United States managed care cancer registry.

Authors:  Onur Baser; Wenhui Wei; Henry J Henk; April Teitelbaum; Lin Xie
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.580

Review 4.  Management of triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Catherine Oakman; Giuseppe Viale; Angelo Di Leo
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Racial differences in outcomes for patients with metastatic breast cancer by disease subtype.

Authors:  Ines Vaz-Luis; Nancy U Lin; Nancy L Keating; William T Barry; Huichuan Lii; Eric P Winer; Rachel A Freedman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California cancer Registry.

Authors:  Katrina R Bauer; Monica Brown; Rosemary D Cress; Carol A Parise; Vincent Caggiano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database.

Authors:  A L Potosky; G F Riley; J D Lubitz; R M Mentnech; L G Kessler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 8.  The role of taxanes in triple-negative breast cancer: literature review.

Authors:  Giorgio Mustacchi; Michelino De Laurentiis
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.162

9.  Age-Related Disparity in Immediate Prognosis of Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Study from SEER Cancer Registries.

Authors:  Wenjie Zhu; Edith A Perez; Ruoxi Hong; Qing Li; Binghe Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, Featuring Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, and State.

Authors:  Betsy A Kohler; Recinda L Sherman; Nadia Howlader; Ahmedin Jemal; A Blythe Ryerson; Kevin A Henry; Francis P Boscoe; Kathleen A Cronin; Andrew Lake; Anne-Michelle Noone; S Jane Henley; Christie R Eheman; Robert N Anderson; Lynne Penberthy
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  5 in total

1.  "It still affects our economic situation": long-term economic burden of breast cancer and lymphedema.

Authors:  Lorraine T Dean; Shadiya L Moss; Yusuf Ransome; Livia Frasso-Jaramillo; Yuehan Zhang; Kala Visvanathan; Lauren Hersch Nicholas; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Cost-effectiveness of adding atezolizumab to first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Bin Wu; Fei Ma
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 8.168

3.  Residential history in cancer research: Utility of the annual billing ZIP code in the SEER-Medicare database and mobility among older women with breast cancer in the United States.

Authors:  S Namin; Y Zhou; E McGinley; K Beyer
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2021-05-19

4.  A population-based comparison of treatment patterns, resource utilization, and costs by cancer stage for Ontario patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Christine Brezden-Masley; Kelly E Fathers; Megan E Coombes; Behin Pourmirza; Cloris Xue; Katarzyna J Jerzak
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Economic and Humanistic Burden of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Min Huang; Amin Haiderali; Grace E Fox; Andrew Frederickson; Javier Cortes; Peter A Fasching; Joyce O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.