Literature DB >> 29505153

Feeding Tube Insertion and Placement Confirmation Using Electromagnetic Guidance: A Team Review.

Kevin P McCutcheon1, Wanda L Whittet1, Julie L Kirsten1, John L Fuchs1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Challenges for bedside placement of small-bore feeding tube (SBFT) include iatrogenic injury, multiple exposures to x-rays, and prolonged placement times. In 2011, the study facility began a feeding tube placement team (FTPT) using the CORTRAK system (CS) in the adult intensive care unit (ICU) and medical-surgical populations. In 2013, a protocol was implemented using the CS to determine final SBFT location.
METHODS: Serial retrospective reviews were done of patients with SBFT placement by the FTPT during July 2011-December 2012 and 2015. Measures included pulmonary deviation, tube location, placement agreement beyond chance for CS tracing and confirmation radiography (CR), x-ray frequency, and placement time intervals.
RESULTS: A total of 6290 SBFT placements were completed for 4239 patients. First-attempt SBFT locations were 12.78% gastric, 13.39% first through fourth portion of duodenum, and 73.83% ligament of Treitz/jejunum, with zero placements in esophagus or lung. In 2015, staff avoided 68 lung placements by recognizing proximal pulmonary deviation. X-ray preprotocol vs protocol (mean [SD]: 1.02 [0.15] vs 0.26 [0.44]) resulted in 74% x-ray reduction and cost avoidance of $346,000. Time intervals (mean [SD]; N = 6290) were 14.90 (12.74) minutes for insertion, 46.04 (13.80) minutes for placement event, and 3.85 (2.23) hours for consult conclusion. Agreement for n = 1692 placements was 85.28%, with k score of 0.622 (95% confidence limit: 0.582, 0.661; P = .0005).
CONCLUSIONS: Team management of SBFT placement using the CS optimizes patient safety, standardizes practice, and decreases cost. Using the CS to determine final SBFT location is a safe alternative to CR.
© 2017 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CORTRAK; blind placement; electromagnetic guidance; nasoenteral tubes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29505153     DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  3 in total

1.  Electromagnetic-guided versus endoscopic placement of post-pyloric feeding tubes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Yaping Wei; Zheng Jin; Ying Zhu; Wei Hu
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2020-12-10

2.  Integrated real-time imaging system, 'IRIS', Kangaroo feeding tube: a guide to placement and image interpretation.

Authors:  Stephen Taylor; Kaylee Sayer; Danielle Milne; Jules Brown; Zeino Zeino
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-10

3.  Efficacy and safety of a modified method for blind bedside placement of post-pyloric feeding tube: a prospective preliminary clinical trial.

Authors:  Xiong Bing; Tang Yinshan; Jin Ying; Shen Yingchuan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.671

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.