Literature DB >> 29505063

Cytological and genome size data analyzed in a phylogenetic frame: Evolutionary implications concerning Sisyrinchium taxa (Iridaceae: Iridoideae).

Paula Burchardt1, Tatiana T Souza-Chies1,2, Olivier Chauveau3, Sidia M Callegari-Jacques1,4, Lauís Brisolara-Corrêa1, Camila Dellanhese Inácio3, Lilian Eggers2,3, Sonja Siljak-Yakovlev5, José Marcello Salabert de Campos6, Eliane Kaltchuk-Santos1,7.   

Abstract

Sisyrinchium is the largest genus of Iridaceae in the Americas and has the greatest amount of cytological data available. This study aimed at investigating how genomes evolved in this genus. Chromosome number, genome size and altitude from species of sect. Viperella were analyzed in a phylogenetic context. Meiotic and pollen analyses were performed to assess reproductive success of natural populations, especially from those polyploid taxa. Character optimizations revealed that the common ancestor of sect. Viperella was probably diploid (2n = 2x =18) with two subsequent polyplodization events. Total DNA content (2C) varied considerably across the phylogeny with larger genomes detected mainly in polyploid species. Altitude also varied across the phylogeny, however no significant relationship was found between DNA content changes and altitude in our data set. All taxa presented regular meiosis and pollen viability (> 87%), except for S. sp. nov. aff. alatum (22.70%), suggesting a recent hybrid origin. Chromosome number is mostly constant within this section and polyploidy is the only source of modification. Although 2C varied considerably among the 20 taxa investigated, the diversity observed cannot be attributed only to polyploidy events because large variations of DNA content were also observed among diploids.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29505063      PMCID: PMC5913718          DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2017-0077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Mol Biol        ISSN: 1415-4757            Impact factor:   1.771


Introduction

Iridaceae is one of the largest Asparagales families (APG IV, 2016), and chromosome number was determined for about 50% of the 2030 species included, although mostly for taxa from the Northern Hemisphere and Africa (Goldblatt and Takei, 1997). Knowledge about cytological characters has been especially helpful for genera circumscription and to understand species relationship in various genera (Goldblatt and Takei, 1997). In this family, there is great karyological variation, comprising karyotype features, basic chromosome number (x) and ploidy level. Chromosome heteromorphism and asymmetry are frequently found in several species (Alves ). Such karyotypic variations are especially related to polyploidy and descending disploidy, both considered important events for the diversification of subfamily Iridoideae (Goldblatt and Takei, 1997; Moraes ). Sisyrinchium L. is the largest genus of Iridaceae in the Americas (Goldblatt and Manning, 2008) and presents a large amount of cytological data, mainly for North American species (Kenton and Heywood, 1984; Kenton ; Goldblatt and Takei, 1997). According to the literature, the ancestral basic chromosome number for Sisyrinchium is probably x = 9 (Goldblatt and Manning, 2008; Chauveau ), although other base numbers (x = 5, 6, 8, 17) also occur within the genus (Goldblatt and Manning, 2008). All Sisyrinchium species from Brazil studied by Souza-Chies had a base chromosome number of x = 9, except Sisyrinchium micranthum Cav. (x = 8; Tacuatiá ). Typically, Sisyrinchium species have small chromosomes, especially those with x = 8 (< 1 mm), hindering karyotype establishment (Kenton ). Similarly to other families of Asparagales, such as Amaryllidaceae and Orchidaceae, Iridaceae present considerable variation in genome size (Bennett and Leitch, 2012) even within genera such as Sisyrinchium, the genus with the largest amount of C-value estimates (Goldblatt ; Kenton ; Moraes ). DNA measurements in Sisyrinchium have shown that DNA contents are generally low, with haploid genomes (C-values) varying between 0.25 and 4.20 pg (Kenton ; Moraes ). Phylogenetic trees have been used, traditionally, to identify patterns of chromosome diversification (Moraes ; Koehler ). More recently, however, statistical analyses, such as ancestral state reconstruction based on maximum likelihood, have enabled studies of karyotype evolution under a phylogenetic perspective (Escudero ; Moraes ). Moreover, cytological data have been successfully used to help taxonomic decisions within Iridaceae (De Tullio ). Sisyrinchium is taxonomically complex, and a study published recently showed that most of the infrageneric subdivisions recognized for the genus are not monophyletic (Chauveau ). This study focused on clade IV of Chauveau , which includes species from South America that belong to two different sections sensu Ravenna: Viperella and Hydastylus in part (Ravenna, 2000, 2002). Thus, in an attempt to provide useful information for future taxonomic studies, cytological data were analyzed in a phylogenetic framework. Considering the scarce cytological information available for Sisyrinchium species from Southern Brazil and its relevance to understand Iridaceae evolution, new data were obtained in the present study concerning: (1) chromosome number and ploidy level, (2) genome size (GS), (3) meiotic behaviour and meiotic index, as well as (4) pollen viability and morphology. Chromosome numbers and GS were then analyzed in an evolutionary context and the relationship between DNA content and altitude variations was also tested.

Material and Methods

Taxonomic sampling

A total of 43 accessions representing 25 Sisyrinchium taxa from clade IV according to Chauveau , hereafter named Viperella-Hydastylus clade, were collected in Brazil from 2006 to 2014. Most species currently recognized in this monophyletic group (see Chauveau ) were included in our sampling. All vouchers were deposited in the ICN Herbarium, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. Based on Chauveau , two members of the sister sect. Spathirhachis were selected as outgroup. Plant material was obtained from the wild, except one outgroup species (Table 1). Taxa sampled, accession numbers, collection data, voucher information and identifiers of GenBank sequence records are given in Table 1. Twenty-seven DNA samples representing each taxon included in the study were used to infer phylogenetic relationships, whereas ploidy levels and genome size information were obtained for 19 and 20 taxa, respectively (Table 2). Additionally, meiotic analyses were conducted on seven species of the ingroup (Table S1), while pollen viability and morphology were reported for 12 species (Table 3).
Table 1

Voucher information, geographical origin, altitude and GenBank accession numbers of Sisyrinchium species sampled.

SpeciesSample IDGeographical originAltitude (m)Voucher rpoC1 rpoB matK-trnK psbA-trnH trnQ-rps16 nad1 2/3 nad4 1/2 ITS
Outgroup species
Sisyrinchium macrocarpum Hieron.SP235Argentina (cultivated at UPSBG)1800-3160(1) Chauveau H09031 (ICN)HQ606576HQ606686HQ606796**HQ606906HQ607016HQ607234HQ607344HQ607124
Sisyrinchium striatum Sm.SP844Chile: Región Metropolitana, Caleu (cultivated at UPSBG)1000 Chauveau H11008 (ICN)KX432394KX432497JQ670496*KF577366KX432699KX432802KX432905KF577205
Ingroup species
Sisyrinchium alatum Hook.ESC318Brazil: Santa Catarina, Campo Alegre (26°10’15.2’’S - 49°14’03.6’’W)975 Eggers & Souza-Chies 318 (ICN)MF506968MF506971KF577263**KF577349MF506976MF506979MF506982KF577188
Sisyrinchium sp. nov. aff. alatum Hook.ESC239Brazil: Paraná, Bituruna (26°05’10.2’’S - 51°39’42.9’’W)1120(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 239 (ICN)KX432309KX432412KF577236**KF577322KX432614KX432717KX432820KF577161
Sisyrinchium sp. nov. aff. alatum Hook.ESC232Brazil: Santa Catarina, Irani (27°00’21.4’’S - 51°52’25.2’’W)1088(3) Eggers & Souza-Chies 232 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium balansae BakerESC464Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, São Francisco de Paula (29°29’11.9’’S - 50°13’15.6’’W)895 Eggers & Souza-Chies 464 (ICN)KX432312KX432415KX432506**KX432560KX432617KX432720KX432823KX432919
Sisyrinchium brasiliense (Ravenna) RavennaESC379Brazil: Paraná, Guarapuava (25°24’13.3’’S - 51°43’44.5’’W)978 Eggers & Souza-Chies 379 (ICN)HQ606550HQ606660HQ606770**HQ606880HQ606990HQ607208HQ607318HQ607099
Sisyrinchium bromelioides R.C.Foster ssp. bromelioides ICS140Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Arroio dos Ratos (30°13’18.8’’S - 51°43’21.7’’W)152 Inácio et al. 140 (ICN)KX432315KX432418KX432533*KX432561KX432620KX432723KX432826
Sisyrinchium caeteanum RavennaESC224Brazil: Santa Catarina, Bom Jardim da Serra (28°23’14.9’’S - 49°33’43.8’’W)1438 Eggers & Souza-Chies 224 (ICN)HQ606537HQ606647HQ606757**HQ606867HQ606977HQ607195HQ607305HQ607086
Sisyrinchium coalitum RavennaESC597Brazil: Santa Catarina, Ponte Alta do Norte (27°16’26.0’’S - 50°26’26.7’’W)1052 Eggers & Souza-Chies 597 (ICN)KX432320KX432423KF577280**KF577368KX432625KX432728KX432831KF577207
Sisyrinchium congestum KlattICEP230Brazil: Santa Catarina, Urubici (28°07’14.2’’S - 49°29’15.2’’W)1738 Inácio et al. 230 (ICN)KX432324KX432427KX432534*KX432564KX432629KX432732KX432835
Sisyrinchium decumbens RavennaESC213Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, São Francisco de Paula (29°26’44.9’’S - 50°36’17.6’’W)892(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 213 (ICN)KX432327KX432430KX432510**KX432566KX432632KX432735KX432838KX432925
Sisyrinchium decumbens RavennaESC204Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Cambará do Sul (29°14’26.9’’S - 50°16’07.7’’W)942 Eggers & Souza-Chies 204 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium decumbens RavennaESC222Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, São José dos Ausentes (28°48’06.0’’S - 49°57’10.0’’W)1133(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 222 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium decumbens RavennaESC570Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Bom Jesus (28°40’35.3’’S - 50°26’16.3’’W)1068 Eggers & Souza-Chies 570 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium densiflorum RavennaICEP257Brazil: Paraná, Ponta Grossa (25°14’38.3’’S - 50°00’41.0’’W)856 Inácio et al. 257 (ICN)KX432330KX432433KX432535*KX432568KX432635KX432738KX432841
Sisyrinchium densiflorum RavennaICEP208Brazil: Paraná, Campo Alegre (26°10’15.9’’S - 49°14’03.6’’W)967 Inácio et al. 208 (ICN)NANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium flabellatum Aita & L.EggersE693Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Jaquirana (28°55’01.8’’S - 50°18’50.0’’W)893 Eggers 693 (ICN)KX432334KX432437KX432513**KX432572KX432639KX432742KX432845KX432931
Sisyrinchium macrocephalum ssp. giganteum RavennaESC382Brazil: Paraná, Mariopolis (26°22’00.5’’S - 52°31’57.9’’W)839 Eggers & Souza-Chies 382 (ICN)KX432365KX432468KF577248**KF577334KX432670KX432773KX432876KF577173
Sisyrinchium macrocephalum ssp. giganteum RavennaESC567Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, São Francisco de Paula (29°05’55.7’’S - 52°37’49.7’’W)872 Eggers & Souza-Chies 567 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium cf. marchioides RavennaESC319Brazil: Santa Catarina, Campo Alegre (26°10’13.9’’S - 49°13’59.6’’W)971 Eggers & Souza-Chies 319 (ICN)MF506969MF506972KF577262**KF577348MF506977MF506980MF506983KF577187
Sisyrinchium marginatum KlattISI143Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Viamão (30°21’50.3’’S - 51°01’44.1’’W)152 Inácio et al. 143 (ICN)KX432347KX432450KX432539*KX432579KX432652KX432755KX432858
Sisyrinchium marginatum KlattESC231Brazil: Santa Catarina, Curitibanos (27°18’45.4’’S - 50°33’43.1’’W)1021(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 231 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium marginatum KlattESC482Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Capão do Leão (31°46’49.1’’S - 52°32’06.1’’W)76 Eggers & Souza-Chies 482 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium marginatum KlattESC486Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, São Lourenço do Sul (31°22’22.2’’S - 52°05’56.1’’W)53(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 486(ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium sp. nov. aff. minense RavennaICEP282Brazil: Minas Gerais, São Roque de Minas (20°11’28.6’’S - 46°39’37.7’’W)1377 Inácio et al. 282 (ICN)KX432357KX432460KX432540*KX432581KX432662KX432765KX432868
Sisyrinchium nidulare (Hand.-Mazz.) I.M.Johnst.ESC240Brazil: Paraná, Pinhão (25°33’52.4’’S - 51°39’30.6’’W)1000(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 240 (ICN)HQ606522HQ606632HQ606742**HQ606852HQ606962HQ607180HQ607290HQ607071
Sisyrinchium nidulare (Hand.-Mazz.) I.M.Johnst.ICEP255Brazil: Paraná, Candoí (25°26’18.2’’S - 51°49’36.6’’W)977 Inácio et al. 255 (ICN)NANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium sp. nov. aff. nidulare (Hand.-Mazz.) I.M.Johnst.ESC348Brazil: Paraná, Jaguariaíva (24°21’17.4’’S - 49°48’22.1’’W)1127 Eggers & Souza-Chies 348 (ICN)KX432361KX432464KF577245**KF577331KX432666KX432769KX432872KF577170
Sisyrinchium palmifolium L. ssp. palmifolium ESC255Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (30°03’33.0’’S - 51°07’03.8’’W)262(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 255 (ICN)KX432367KX432470KF577239**KF577325KX432672KX432775KX432878KF577164
Sisyrinchium palmifolium L. ssp. palmifolium ESC469Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Aceguá (31°39’00.8’’S - 54°09’09.1’’W)172 Eggers & Souza-Chies 469 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium palmifolium L. ssp. palmifolium ESC487Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, São Gabriel (30°14’40.1’’S - 54°22’13.6’’W)101 Eggers & Souza-Chies 487 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium plicatulum RavennaESC167Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, São Francisco de Paula (29°25’25.7’’S - 50°30’50.4’’W)866(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 167 (ICN)KX432374KX432477KX432523**KX432588KX432679KX432782KX432885KX432947
Sisyrinchium plicatulum RavennaESC650Brazil: Santa Catarina, Campo Alegre (26°10’16.5’’S - 49°14’04.3’’W)1017 Eggers & Souza-Chies 650 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium rectilineum RavennaBKF2Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, São Francisco de Paula (29°25’26.1’’S - 50°30’50.6’’W)864 Burchardtet al.2 (FUEL)MF506970MF506973MF506974*MF506975MF506978MF506981MF506984MF506985
Sisyrinchium restioides Spreng.ESC217Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, São Francisco de Paula (29°23’06.0’’S - 50°26’09.0’’W)889(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 217 (ICN)KX432384KX432487KF577235**KF577321KX432689KX432792KX432895KF577160
Sisyrinchium restioides Spreng.ESC252Brazil: Santa Catarina, Correia Pinto (27°37’07.3’’S - 50°20’43.1’’W)884(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 252 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium vaginatum Spreng. ssp. vaginatum ESC463Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Pelotas (31°39’16.0"S - 52°28’11.0"W)85(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 463 (ICN)KX432399KX432502KF577277**KF577364KX432704KX432807KX432910KF577203
Sisyrinchium vaginatum Spreng. ssp. vaginatum ESC471Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Candiota (31°31’20.0"S - 53°30’40.1"W)394 Eggers & Souza-Chies 471 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium vaginatum Spreng. ssp. vaginatum ESC563Brazil: Rio Grande do Sul, Caxias do Sul (29°04’00.4"S - 50°58’31.5"W)835 Eggers & Souza-Chies 563 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium weirii BakerESC248Brazil: Paraná, Palmeira (25°26’05.4"S - 49°50’54.5"W)948(2) Eggers & Souza-Chies 248 (ICN)HQ606535HQ606645HQ606755**HQ606865HQ606975HQ607193HQ607303HQ607084
Sisyrinchium weirii BakerESC359Brazil: Paraná, Balsa Nova (25°27’55.8"S - 49°44’54.1"W)1048 Eggers & Souza-Chies 359 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium wettsteinii Hand.-Mazz.ICEP224Brazil: Santa Catarina, Água Doce (26°44’38.4"S - 51°39’27.7"W)1284 Inácio et al. 224 (ICN)KX432401KX432504KX432553*KX432603KX432706KX432809KX432912
Sisyrinchium wettsteinii Hand.-Mazz.ESC405Brazil: Santa Catarina, Santa Cecília (26°46’22.5"S - 50°20’59.8"W)1158 Eggers & Souza-Chies 405 (ICN)NANANANANANANANA
Sisyrinchium sp. nov. I258ICEP258Brazil: Paraná, Ponta Grossa (25°14’38.3’’S - 50°00’41.0’’W)856 Inácio et al. 258 (ICN)KX432402KX432505KX432554*KX432604KX432707KX432810KX432913
Table 2

Accession numbers, sampling for phylogenetic analyses, chromosome numbers, ploidy levels, 2C DNA content (pg and Mbp) and monoploid genome sizes (1Cx value) of Sisyrinchium species included in the study.

SpeciesSample IDDNA sequences2n (ploidy level)2C (pg)2C (Mbp)1Cx (pg)
Outgroup species
S. macrocarpum SP235X18 (2x)2.1921421.09
S. striatum SP844X18 (2x)2.7126501.35
Ingroup species
S. alatum ESC318X36 (4x)7.3071391.83
S. subsp. nov. aff. alatum ESC239X18 (2x)4.0339412.01
S. subsp. nov. aff. alatum ESC232NA18 (2x)NANANA
S. balansae ESC464X18 (2x)2.5524941.28
S. brasiliense ESC379XNA4.684577NA
S. bromelioides ssp. bromelioides ISC140XNANANANA
S. caeteanum ESC224XNA8.177990NA
S. coalitum ESC597XNANANANA
S. congestum ICEP230XNANANANA
S. decumbens ESC213X18 (2x)2.0820341.04
S. decumbens ESC204NA18 (2x)2.7126501.35
S. decumbens ESC222NA18 (2x)2.6525921.32
S. decumbens ESC570NA18 (2x)2.6425821.32
S. densiflorum ICEP257XNANANANA
S. densiflorum ICEP208NA18 (2x)3.8437551.92
S. flabellatum E693X18 (2x)2.9929241.49
S. macrocephalum subsp. giganteum ESC382X18 (2x)4.8046942.40
S. macrocephalum subsp. giganteum ESC567NA18 (2x)4.7646552.38
S. cf. marchioides ESC319X36 (4x)5.6955651.42
S. marginatum ISI143X18 (2x)4.9047922.45
S. marginatum ESC231NA18 (2x)NANANA
S. marginatum ESC482NA18 (2x)NANANA
S. marginatum ESC486NA18 (2x)NANANA
S. sp. nov. aff. minense ICEP282XNANANANA
S. nidulare ICEP255NA18 (2x)3.7536671.87
S. nidulare ESC240X18 (2x)3.3432661.67
S. sp. nov. aff. nidulare ESC348XNANANANA
S. palmifolium subsp. palmifolium ESC255X18 (2x)4.7446362.37
S. palmifolium subsp. palmifolium ESC469NA18 (2x)NANANA
S. palmifolium subsp. palmifolium ESC487NA18 (2x)4.7546452.38
S. plicatulum ESC167X18 (2x)4.8547432.42
S. plicatulum ESC650NA18 (2x)NANANA
S. rectilineum BKF 2X18 (2x)5.3051832.65
S. restioides ESC217X18 (2x)NANANA
S. restioides ESC252NA18 (2x)NANANA
S. vaginatum subsp. vaginatum ESC463X18 (2x)2.6826211.34
S. vaginatum subsp. vaginatum ESC471NA18 (2x)2.6025421.30
S. vaginatum subsp. vaginatum ESC563NA18 (2x)2.2922401.14
S. weirii ESC248X54 (6x)7.7775991.29
S. weirii ESC359NA54 (6x)6.9668071.16
S. wettsteinii ICEP224X18 (2x)4.3542542.17
S. wettsteinii ESC405NA18 (2x)NANANA
S. sp. nov. I258ICEP258XNANANANA
Table 3

Viability, dimensions and morphology of pollen grains from Sisyrinchium species.

SpeciesViabilityN* Polar axis (P) (μm)Equatorial diameter (E) (μm)Ratio (P/E)Morphology
N* %# MeanMeanMean
S. alatum 1 (500)98.501 (20)36.0043.100.84suboblate
S. balansae 1 (500)99.301 (20)24.8031.100.80suboblate
S. decumbens 9 (4500)96.337 (140)28.0931.260.90oblate spheroidal
S. macrocephalum subsp. giganteum 5 (2500)99.085 (100)26.1231.410.83suboblate
S. marginatum 20 (10000)93.0120 (400)31.4235.580.88oblate spheroidal
S. nidulare 4 (2000)87.704 (80)31.9033.750.95oblate spheroidal
S. palmifolium subsp. palmifolium 5 (2500)97.285 (100)28.5832.320.89oblate spheroidal
S. rectilineum 5 (2500)97.685 (100)28.5631.530.91oblate spheroidal
S. restioides 1 (500)97.801 (20)34.6035.700.97oblate spheroidal
S. sp. nov. aff. alatum 1 (500)22.701 (20)44.9043.301.04prolate spheroidal
S. weirii 1 (500)93.501 (20)35.9041.600.86suboblate
S. wettsteinii 5 (2500)93.725 (100)29.4832.590.90oblate spheroidal

Mitotic analysis

Root tips were pretreated with 8-hydroxyquinoline (2 mM) for 24 h at 10 °C, fixed in absolute ethanol/glacial acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 24 h at room temperature and stored at -20 °C until further analysis. Fixed root tips were washed in 10 mM citrate buffer pH 4.6 and digested in a solution of 4% cellulase, 1% pectolyase and 4% hemicellulase at 37 °C for about 30 min. Digested root tips were macerated in a drop of 45% acetic acid and slides were coverslipped; coverslips were removed in liquid nitrogen and the slides were air dried. The best slides were stained in 2% Giemsa and mounted in Entellan (Merck). Alternatively, some slides were prepared following the standard Feulgen method. All observations were performed using a Zeiss Axioplan Universal photomicroscope.

Genome size estimations

Total DNA content was assessed by flow cytometry according to Marie and Brown (1993) and Dolezel . Petunia hybrida Vilm. ‘PxPC6’ (2C = 2.85 pg; Marie and Brown, 1993), Solanum lycopersicum L. ‘Montfavet 63-5’ (2C = 1.99 pg, Lepers-Andrzejewski ) and Pisum sativum L. ‘Long Express’(2C = 8.37 pg, Marie and Brown, 1993) were used as internal standards. To release the nuclei into suspension, the material was chopped in 1 mL of a nuclear-isolation buffer (Galbraith ) supplemented with 10 mM sodium metabisulphite and 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone 10000 and RNase (2.5 U/mL; Amresco, USA). The DNA content of 5,000–10,000 stained nuclei was determined for each sample using either an Elite ESP (Beckman-Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), a Partec CyFlow or a FACSAria II (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) flow cytometer. For each measurement of DNA content, 3–5 samples were assessed and the average value was used as the 2C content for the following analyses. The total 2C DNA value was calculated as: sample peak mean / standard peak mean × 2C DNA content of standard (pg). The term ‘monoploid genome size’ (1Cx) was used to represent the DNA content of one non-replicated genome with basic chromosome number x (Greilhuber ), whereas 2C refers to the whole GS of a somatic cell.

Meiotic analysis

Flower buds were fixed in ethanol/glacial acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 24 h at room temperature and kept at -20 °C. For slide preparation, anthers were washed in distilled water and squashed in 1% propionic carmine. Slides were examined and documented with an Axioplan Universal photomicroscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). All available phases of meiosis I and II were analyzed. Abnormalities, such as non-orientated bivalents and multivalents in metaphase I, bridges and laggards in anaphase and telophases I and II, were evaluated. Meiotic indexes were calculated from 200 pollen tetrads per plant using the formula: MI = (number of normal tetrads/total number of tetrads) × 100. Microcytes and micronuclei, bridges, and unequally sized cells were considered abnormalities. Chromosome numbers were determined in diakinesis (prophase I).

Pollen stainability and morphology

Pollen stainability and pollen morphology were used to assess pollen viability. Flowers buds at preanthesis were collected, fixed and stored as described above. Slides were prepared following Alexander’s method (Alexander, 1980), in which empty, non-viable pollen grains stain green, whereas full, viable pollen grains stain purple. Samples of 500 pollen grains per flower were analyzed from at least one individual per taxon. In order to determine pollen grain shape, measurements of the polar axis (P) and equatorial diameter (E) of 20 mature pollen grains per individual were performed after Alexander’s staining method. The P/E ratios of the grains were used to classify pollen morphology according to Erdtman (1971).

Statistical analysis

The DNA content 2C and 1Cx were compared between diploids and polyploids using Student’s t-test, whereas one-way ANOVA followed by Tukeys multiple comparisons tests were employed to compare taxa for these variables. Data of one population, at random, was used when data of more than one population was available for a determined taxon. The ploidy level of two taxa (S. brasiliense and S. caeteanum) of unknown chromosome number was inferred taking into account their 2C content, using two approaches: a cluster analysis using squared Euclidian distance and centroid linkage in order to group taxa, and a discriminant analysis, using prior membership probabilities based on the number of known diploid and polyploid species (13 and 3 species, respectively). A p-value of 0.05 was considered the threshold for statistical significance.

Sequence data, alignments and phylogenetic analyses

Newly sequenced specimens were field-collected and genomic DNA was extracted from 10–15 mg silica-dried leaf material using a modified CTAB protocol with volumes adjusted to 2 mL tubes (Doyle and Doyle, 1990). A combination of nine coding and non-coding DNA plastid, mitochondrial and nuclear regions previously used by Chauveau , 2012) was selected (i.e. matK, rpoC1, rpoB, matK-5’trnK, psbA-trnH, trnQ-rps16, nad1-2/3, nad4-1/2 and ITS). DNA primers and PCR amplification protocols were the same as those described in Chauveau , 2012). All PCR products were sent to the Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering Centre of the State University of Campinas (CBMEG/UNICAMP, SP, Brazil) for sequencing. CodonCode Aligner 6.0.2 (CodonCode Corp., Dedham, MA, USA) was used to edit chromatograms and contigs. Nineteen new DNA sequences were generated for this study and sequences already deposited in GenBank were added to complete our data set. Alignments of DNA sequences were conducted with MAFFT 7 (Katoh and Standley, 2013) and manually validated with MEGA6 (Tamura ). Unambiguously aligned gaps shared by two or more taxa were coded with SeqState 1.4.1 (Müller, 2005), according to the Modified Complex Indel Coding approach (Simmons ). Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using two parametric methods: Maximum Likelihood (ML) with bootstrapping in RAxML 8.2.9 (Stamatakis, 2014) and Bayesian inference (BI) with MrBayes 3.2.6 (Ronquist ). ML and BI analyses were initially performed on each DNA region separately, and then on cpDNA and mtDNA markers respectively combined, to detect potential outliers or incongruence among loci or genomes. Conflicts were explored through visual examination of resulting ML trees and comparison of nodes with ≥ 70% bootstrap support. These separate analyses were all conducted with RAxML as implemented on the XSEDE server of the CIPRES Science Gateway (Miller ) following a three-step process: (1) a thorough ML search with 200 randomized starting trees to find the best-scored likelihood tree; (2) non-parametric bootstrap statistics (-b) calculated from 1,000 thorough bootstrap iterations; and (3) bootstrap values were mapped on the best-scored tree. A GTRGAMMA model was used in each step with data partitioned for each gene, intron or spacer region, and codon position in the regions coding for proteins to accommodate locus-specific variations. Gap-coded characters were also partitioned by locus. All data were then combined for subsequent analyses. The Maximum Likelihood analysis of the total evidence data set was performed following the three-step process previously described, whereas partitioned MrBayes analysis was conducted with two independent runs of four chains each and eight million generations, sampling trees every 1,000 generations, using the models selected with the Akaike information criterion (AIC) by MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander, 2004) for each partition (Table S2). Gap-coded characters were included as additional datatype and treated using a simple model with variable rates. Convergence was verified by checking the average deviation of split frequencies (< 0.01), the Effective Sample Size (ESS > 200) and the Potential Scale Reduction Factor (0.99 < PSRF < 1.01) reported by MrBayes. Default value was used for the burn-in phase and a majority-rule consensus tree was computed. Phylogenetic trees resulting from ML and BI analyses (ML best-scoring tree and BI majority-rule tree) were rooted on S. macrocarpum + S. striatum and combined to manually build a highly conservative consensus tree that summarizes the results of both analyses at once. A given node was kept in the consensus tree only if the ML bootstrap support was ≥ 70% or if the PP was ≥ 0.95 and in the absence of topological conflict among ML and BI trees.

Ancestral character state reconstructions and regression analyses

The consensus topology (Figure 1) was used for discrete character optimization (i.e., chromosome number) with the maximum parsimony (MP) and ML methods implemented in MESQUITE 3.10 (Maddison and Maddison, 2016). With MP, character states were treated as unordered, allowing any transition among states. ML optimization was conducted using the MK1 model of evolution (Schluter ; Pagel, 1999), which gives equal probability for changes between all character states. For continuous character optimizations (i.e., DNA content (2C) and altitude) a pruned phylogram was generated by reducing the phylogeny obtained in the current study to terminals for which we had genome size data. Maximum likelihood ancestral state reconstructions were performed using the contMap command of phytools package (Revell, 2012) in R 3.4.1 (R Core Team, 2017).
Figure 1

Strict consensus tree based on the estimated maximum likelihood tree and the Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree obtained from the analyses of the whole molecular data set. The tree is rooted using Sisyrinchium striatum+S. macrocarpum as outgroup. Support values indicated above branches follow the order likelihood bootstrap support (LBS)/ Bayesian posterior probability (PP) and are provided for a given node only if one of the values reached the following thresholds: LBS ≥ 70% or PP ≥ 0.95. A dash (-) indicates support value of less than 50% for LBS or less than 0.95 for PP. For each taxon, (1) horizontal light grey bars indicate normalized natural log values of altitude, whereas (2) horizontal dark grey bars show normalized DNA content (2C) values.

We used a multiple regression-type approach to test for adaptive adjustment of the genome size to elevation. The altitude data were log transformed and the pruned phylogram was used for phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) regressions. A non-phylogenetic linear least squares regression analysis was performed in R and, to account for dependence of species values due to phylogenetic relatedness, PGLS regressions were conducted with the packages nlme (Pinheiro ) and caper (Orme ) in R. Analyses were performed with different alternative evolutionary models: Pagel’s λ (Pagel, 1997) with constraint and unconstraint values, Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (Hansen, 1997) and a Brownian motion model (Felsenstein, 1985).

Results

Chromosome numbers, karyotypes and genome size

Chromosome counts for 17 taxa are presented here in Table 2 (excluding outgroup species); all but one (S. alatum) had their number determined for the first time. Most taxa are diploids (2n = 2x = 18), and only three of them are polyploids (Sisyrinchium alatum and S. cf. marchioides are 2n = 4x = 36 and S. weirii is 2n = 6x = 54). Despite this ploidy variation, all taxa had the same base chromosome number x = 9. Intraspecific polyploidy or cytotype variation were not found for any species. Although chromosome measurements were not carried out in any species, a remarkable difference in the size of chromosomes could be observed among the analyzed taxa. The smallest chromosomes were those of S. decumbens and S. wettsteinii (Figure 2A and H, respectively), and the largest chromosomes were found in S. macrocephalum subsp. giganteum (Figure 2E). With regard to chromosome size, Sisyrinchium decumbens and S. densiflorum (Figure 2A and B, respectively) apparently have more symmetrical karyotypes, while, S. macrocephalum subsp. giganteum and S. palmifolium subsp. palmifolium seemed to have the most asymmetrical karyotypes, comprising large and small chromosome pairs. The first one has at least three pairs of satellited chromosomes and the second species with one satellite pair was clearly observed (Figure 2E and F respectively).
Figure 2

Mitotic metaphases/prometaphase of Sisyrinchium taxa. A, S. decumbens; B, S. densiflorum; C, S. flabellatum; D, S. marginatum; E, S. macrocephalum subsp. giganteum; F, S. palmifolium subsp. palmifolium; G, S. rectilineum; H, S. wettsteinii. Note that all have the same 2n = 18, but present remarkably different karyotypes in regards to chromosome size and shape (p.e. A × E). Satellites are only recognizable in E and F. Bar in H represents 10 μm.

Concerning DNA amount, we observed 2C ranging from 2C = 2.08 pg in S. decumbens to 2C = 8.17 pg in S. caeteanum (Table 2, Figure 3A), representing a difference of more than 3-fold in genome size. As expected, the 2C values increased according to ploidy level (t = 4.67, p < 0.001, n = 13 diploid and 3 polyploid species), with smaller DNA content in diploids (mean ± SD: 3.92 ± 0.99; n = 13 species) and higher in the polyploids (tetraploids S. cf. marchioides 2C = 5.69 and S. alatum 2C = 7.30 pg; hexaploid S. weirii 2C = 7.77 pg; mean ± SD: 6.92 ± 1.09; n = 3 species). Although S. caeteanum presented the largest genome (8.17 pg), compared to the other species, its chromosome number and ploidy could not be ascertained. On the other hand, taking into account only the 13 diploid taxa (all 2n = 18), the DNA content varied greatly, ranging from 2C = 2.08 to 5.30 pg, evidencing an increase in 2C DNA content not associated with the ploidy level (Figure 3A). Monoploid genome sizes (1Cx) ranged from 1.04 pg to 2.65 pg (Table 2, Figure 3B). Tetraploids had 1Cx values in average lower than most diploid taxa (mean ± SD: 1.62 ± 0.29; n = 2 species), and the hexaploid showed one of the smallest 1Cx (1.16 pg) (see Figure 3B). However, the average difference in Cx between diploids and polyploids was not statistically significant (t = 1.49, p = 0.159).
Figure 3

Distribution of DNA content (2C) (A) and monoploid genome size (1Cx) (B) among Sisyrinchium taxa. Ploidy levels are indicated as circle (2x), star (4x) or hexagon (6x).

Chromosome number could not be determined for Sisyrinchium brasiliense and S. caeteanum, therefore the 1Cx value could not be calculated either. Aiming to infer the ploidy level of these taxa, we performed a discriminant analysis and constructed a dendrogram based on the 2C content of all taxa. The discriminant function was statistically significant (p < 0.001), and all but one taxa of known ploidy were correctly classified. The exception was the tetraploid S. cf. marchioides, which was classified as diploid due to its intermediate 2C value (5.69 pg). This taxon grouped with diploids in the cluster analysis also (Figure S1). Based on the discriminant analysis, the diploid group membership probabilities for the two species of undetermined ploidy were 0.975 for S. brasiliense and 0.001 for S. caeteanum. Therefore, even though we were unable to determine chromosome numbers of S. brasiliense and S. caeteanum, the statistical analysis of genome sizes indicates that they probably are diploid and polyploid (possibly tetra- or hexaploid), respectively.

Meiotic behavior and pollen viability/morphology

All taxa presented highly regular meiosis (97.11–99.45%; Table S1; Figure 4). The most common abnormalities were non-oriented bivalents, metaphases with stickiness (Figure 4I) and anaphase bridges (Figure 4J) in either anaphase I or anaphase II, sometimes with fragments or laggards. Multivalents and univalents were not observed in any taxa. The meiotic indexes were high for all taxa (> 95%; Table S1) and they had at least 87% viable pollen grains (Table 3), except for Sisyrinchium sp. nov. aff. alatum which had a very low pollen viability (22.70%). Pollen grains were classified into three distinct morphologies according to their P/E ratio (Table 3). We found that most taxa have oblate spheroidal pollens, while only one species (Sisyrinchium sp. nov. aff. alatum) has prolate spheroidal pollen grains. The smallest pollen measures were observed in S. balansae and the largest were those from S. sp. nov. aff. alatum, both diploid species.
Figure 4

Meiotic analysis of Sisyrinchium taxa – haploid chromosome numbers and observed meiotic abnormalities. A, S. palmifolium subsp. palmifolium, n = 9 (prophase I - diakinesis); B, S. marginatum, n = 9 (prophase I - diplotene); C, S. alatum, n = 18 (prophase I - diakinesis); D, S. decumbens, n = 9 (prophase I - diakinesis); E, S. macrocephalum subsp. giganteum, n = 9 (prophase I - diakinesis); F, S. rectilineum, n = 9, in diakinesis with two univalents (arrows); G, S. sp. nov. aff. alatum, n = 9 (prophase I - diakinesis); H, S. restioides, n = 9 (prophase I - diakinesis); I, S. rectilineum in metaphase I with stickiness (arrow); J, S. rectilineum in anaphase II with bridge (arrow); K, S. weirii, n = 27 (prophase I - diakinesis); L, S. palmifolium subsp. palmifolium showing ‘tetrad’ with several microspores; M, S. rectilineum showing tetrad with microcytes (arrows); N, S. marginatum showing an abnormally shaped pollen grain; O, S. marginatum showing viable pollen grain (V) and two unviable pollen grains (*). Bar in O represents 10 μm.

Phylogenetic analyses

Since no significantly supported incongruence was detected among tree topologies obtained from independent analyses of each DNA marker (data not shown), all DNA regions from the three genomic compartments were concatenated for subsequent analyses. The combined alignment reached 8565 characters divided into 8535 nucleotide positions and 30 coded indels. Plastid, mitochondrial and nuclear regions contained, respectively, 4639, 3272 and 684 characters. The number of potentially informative sites was 123 (2.65%) for the cpDNA data set, 70 (2.14%) for the mtDNA matrix and 54 (7.89%) for the ITS alignment. ML and Bayesian analyses of the total combined data set produced similar topologies. Therefore, the ML best-scored tree and the 50% majority-rule BI tree were summarized as a strict consensus phylogeny presented in Figure 1, with nodes supported above 70% by ML bootstrap estimates or 0.95 by BI posterior probability values. The MP and ML analyses of the diploid chromosome number (2n) evolution on the strict consensus tree produced consistent results (Figure 5), and both phylogenetic uncertainty and missing data had little effect on reconstructed ancestral states at key nodes. Character optimizations suggested that the common ancestor of sect. Viperella was probably diploid (2n = 2x =18), with two subsequent polyplodization events within the section. One transition towards tetraploidy occurred at the base of the clade formed by S. coalitum, S. alatum, S. cf. marchioides and S. weirii, and the hexaploid condition of the latter species was probably derived from the common tetraploid ancestor of S. cf. marchioides + S. weirii.
Figure 5

Mirror trees showing MP (Tree 1) and ML (Tree 2) optimizations of diploid chromosome numbers (2n) on the strict consensus tree. External nodes are coloured according to the character state observed, whereas internal nodes are coloured according to the ancestral state inferred (Tree 1) or to the relative likelihood values calculated for each character state (Tree 2). Missing data are indicated in grey.

Total DNA content (2C) varied considerably and repeatedly across the phylogeny (Figure 6, Tree 1), with conspicuously larger genomes in polyploid species and in S. caeteanum. ML optimization of genome size evolution suggested that the section’s ancestral state was intermediate (2C of ca. 4.72 pg) and was relatively higher at the base of S. alatum + S. cf. marchioides + S. weirii (2C of ca. 6.05 pg) and the clade formed by S. caeteanum and S. decumbens (2C of ca. 6.65 pg). Altitude also varied repeatedly across the phylogeny (Figure 6, Tree 2), and the ML optimization of this environmental factor along the phylogeny showed that the ancestor of Viperella probably occurred at ca. 790 m elevation. However, the ancestral state analysis did not reveal a specific pattern of evolution in relation to genome size.
Figure 6

Mirror trees showing maximum likelihood ancestral state reconstructions of DNA content (2C) on Tree 1 and natural log of altitude on Tree 2. Optimizations of continuous characters were performed with the contMap command of Phytools in R. Branch lengths are proportional to the number of molecular substitutions per site.

Significant phylogenetic signals were not detected for both genome size (2C) and altitude when measured using Pagel’s λ and Blomberg’s K (Table 4). Moreover, results of non-phylogenetic linear least squares regression and phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) regressions (Table 5) showed that no significant relationship (p > 0.05) was found between the magnitude or direction of DNA content changes and natural log of altitude in our data set.
Table 4

Tests for phylogenetic signal of DNA content (2C) and altitude (natural log; m) among taxa of Sisyrinchium used in the present study.

K P-value λ P-value
Genome size0.4870.4490.4570.415
log of altitude0.1340.5336.6*10-5 0.691
Table 5

Tests for adaptive adjustments of the DNA content (2C)-altitude (natural log; m) relationship among taxa of Sisyrinchium used in the present study: results from the non-phylogenetic linear least squares regression and phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) regressions.

AICSlopeStd. error P-value
Linear regression NA0.5041.2470.690
PGLS
Brownian motion81.6320.5040.6510.449
Ornstein-Uhlenbeck81.3850.5440.7410.472
Pagel’s λ:
λ=082.4280.5041.2470.690
λ=177.4650.5040.6510.449
λ unconstraint81.4180.9641.1110.397

Discussion

Karyotype and GS evolution

The data obtained here demonstrate that base chromosome number x = 9 is constant among taxa of sect. Viperella which is also the most frequent in Southern Hemisphere Sisyrinchium species (Kenton and Heywood, 1984). Thus, this is a constant character within the clade, in which the absence of dysploidy and few polyploidy events were observed. Diploid chromosome number (2n = 18) was estimated as the ancestral condition of the section and polyploidy is a derived character restricted to only three species (Figure 5), suggesting that this phenomenon was not important to the evolution of this group, contrary to almost all other Iridoideae from South America (Moraes ). Notwithstanding the role of polyploidy in Iridaceae evolution, diploids and lower polyploids (tetra- and hexaploids) are most frequent among Southern Hemisphere Sisyrinchium (Tacuatiá , 2016). The optimization of ploidy level shown in Figure 5 evidenced that a polyploidization event gave rise to the tetraploid S. alatum and S. cf. marchioides and the hexaploid S. weirii; while, the hexaploid condition was probably derived from the common tetraploid ancestor of S. cf. marchioides + S. weirii, as was already proposed here. Polyploid cytotypes have been reported in some Iridaceae species, such as S. micranthum (4x and 6x; Tacuatiá ), S. sellowianum Klatt (4x; Fachinetto ) and Herbertia lahue (Molina) Goldblatt (4x, 6x and 8x; Moraes ; Stiehl-Alves ). However, in this study we did not find any cytotypes within taxa. Different populations/localities (see Tables 1 and 2) were sampled for S. decumbens, S. marginatum, S. vaginatum subsp. vaginatum and S. palmifolium subsp. palmifolium, but different chromosome numbers were not found in any accessions for these taxa. Hence, events of intraspecific polyploidization apparently did not take place within taxa of sect. Viperella. A noticeable chromosome size variation was observed among the studied Viperella taxa, as previously reported for other South American species of Sisyrinchium (Kenton and Heywood, 1984; Rudall ). Even without chromosome measurements performed for such species, it is possible to see that Sisyrinchium decumbens presents the most symmetrical karyotype and has also the smallest DNA content, while S. palmifolium subsp. palmifolium has a more asymmetrical karyotype and a considerably higher DNA amount. This pattern has been reported across Liliaceae (Peruzzi ), indicating that increases in genome size were generally accompanied by increasing karyotype asymmetry. In future studies, it might be interesting to test the association between the symmetry and the homogeneity of certain environmental variables, such as climatic or geographic parameters. In relation to the character genome size, an intermediate 2C value was the ancestral state from which genome size increases and decreases took place, as is remarkable for S. decumbens. Probably, all these transitions could be interpreted as independent or homoplasious events and thus, the increment of genome size does not necessarily correspond to speciation events in this clade. Considering the occurrence of only three polyploid species in this section, it seems that the transitions towards larger genome size are not related to polyploidy. Although Iridaceae presents a large range of 2C values from 0.96 to 62.76 pg (Bennett and Leitch, 2012), Sisyrinchium is known to display much smaller values, that vary between 2C = 1.00 and 2C = 8.40 pg and a monoploid genome size (1Cx) ranging from 0.32 to 3.56 pg (Kenton ). Estimates of DNA amounts for Sisyrinchium species are reported solely for 30 taxa, less than 22% of the total number of species in the genus (Kenton ). All taxa examined in the present work, except S. alatum, had their genome size estimated for the first time. According to the size categories established by Leitch , most of the investigated Sisyrinchium representatives (12 species; 60%) fall within the category of small genome sizes (2.8 ≤ 2C < 7pg); five species (25%) have very small (2C < 2.8) and only three present intermediate (7 ≤ 2C < 28) genome sizes. In our study, taxa of sect. Viperella, although with variable genome sizes, present the same base chromosome number (x = 9), as seen in sect. Echthronema (sensu Benth. & Hook.) (Kenton ). Despite such relationships and similarities, the analyzed taxa differed greatly in their genome sizes, especially considering the three polyploid species. Taxa studied herein presented intermediate to high 1Cx values, with the smallest genomes in S. decumbens (1Cx = 1.08 pg) and the largest in S. rectilineum (1Cx = 2.65 pg), both diploids. Considering that all diploid taxa have the same chromosome number (2n = 18), it is noteworthy that the genome size of S. decumbens is approximately half of that found in S. rectilineum. Compared to diploids, the polyploids S. alatum, S. cf. marchioides and S. weirii presented a reduction in 1Cx, which is even higher in the hexaploid S. weirii. Such reduction could be a ‘genome downsizing’ effect, as widely reported for many polyploid species (Leitch and Bennett, 2004; Suda ; Pellicer ), including Sisyrinchium (Kenton ; Tacuatiá ). Although the difference in 1Cx content between diploids and polyploids was not statistically significant, our data suggest that genome downsizing may also be present in the section Viperella, but was not detected statistically, probably due to the small number of polyploid taxa. It has been reported that ploidy level, chromosome size and genome size increase with latitude and/or altitude for several Sisyrinchium species (Rudall ; Kenton ). In our study, variability in genome size could not be attributed to altitude, once significant phylogenetic signals were not detected in the regression analysis (see Table 5 and Figure 6), in spite of the occurrence of all polyploid species in altitudes higher than 900 m (Table 1). Different proportions of repetitive DNA sequences, especially transposable elements (TE), can also cause genome size variation in plants (Bennetzen ; Leitch and Leitch, 2012). Thus, differential TE activity might be a mechanism behind 2C content variation found in diploids from our data set. Slow growing, long lived species might contain greater accumulation of repetitive sequences than faster developing species (Charlesworth ), providing an explanation for the larger genomes of the perennial taxa studied here compared to the annual species investigated by Tacuatiá . Thus, future work aiming repetitive DNA sequences characterization in this group of species should be done.

Meiotic behavior and pollen viability

The meiotic behavior and pollen viability data obtained here are relevant to the investigation of the mechanisms of polyploidy involved in the evolutionary process. As expected, almost all diploid taxa presented a regular meiosis and high pollen viability. Although meiotic behavior and meiotic indexes were not analyzed for polyploid species, elevated pollen viability was found in S. alatum (98.50%, 2n = 4x = 36) and S. weirii (93.5%, 2n = 6x =54), indicating meiotic regularity and male-fertile plants. Such stable behavior was also reported for S. micranthum, in both diploids and polyploids (Tacuatiá ) and for other Sisyrinchium species that were considered interspecific hybrids that underwent genome stabilization (Henderson, 1976; Cholewa and Henderson, 1984). The diploid Sisyrinchium sp. nov. aff. alatum was the only species with very low pollen viability (22.70%), and in this case a putative hybrid status cannot be ruled out. More morphological and cytological studies are necessary to confirm this assumption. Significant differences on pollen size were found among cytotypes of S. micranthum (Tacuatiá ), where hexaploids (2n = 48) presented pollen grains significantly bigger than those of diploids (2n = 16). In the present work, although there was no apparent correlation between 2C DNA contents and pollen grain size, polyploid species have some of the largest pollen grains and also the highest 2C DNA contents (Tables 2 and 3).

Concluding remarks

This study reports the first attempts to understand patterns underlying karyotype and genome evolution in Sisyrinchium, sect. Viperella. Despite the stability in base chromosome number (x = 9), evolutionary changes in karyotypes of this section involve primarily variation in DNA amount, regardless of ploidy level, and secondly, polyploidy and variation in chromosome size. Although polyploidy and disploidy are considered important factors in the evolution of South American Iridaceae, in Sisyrinchium sect. Viperella polyploids they are less frequent, and disploidy changes were not reported. By raising mostly novel cytological data and analyzing them in a phylogenetic context, we suggest six transitions toward a genome size increase for the taxa of sect. Viperella that were originated from mechanisms other than polyploidy.
  27 in total

1.  Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human.

Authors:  J Dolezel; J Bartos; H Voglmayr; J Greilhuber
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.355

2.  Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Jianxin Ma; Katrien M Devos
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  SeqState: primer design and sequence statistics for phylogenetic DNA datasets.

Authors:  Kai Müller
Journal:  Appl Bioinformatics       Date:  2005

4.  LIKELIHOOD OF ANCESTOR STATES IN ADAPTIVE RADIATION.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter; Trevor Price; Arne Ø Mooers; Donald Ludwig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Evolution of DNA amounts across land plants (embryophyta).

Authors:  I J Leitch; D E Soltis; P S Soltis; M D Bennett
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 6.  A cytometric exercise in plant DNA histograms, with 2C values for 70 species.

Authors:  D Marie; S C Brown
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Genome size dynamics in Artemisia L. (Asteraceae): following the track of polyploidy.

Authors:  J Pellicer; S Garcia; M A Canela; T Garnatje; A A Korobkov; J D Twibell; J Vallès
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.081

8.  MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability.

Authors:  Kazutaka Katoh; Daron M Standley
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Chromosome characterization and variability in some Iridaceae from Northeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Lânia Isis F Alves; Saulo Antônio A Lima; Leonardo P Felix
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 1.771

10.  MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space.

Authors:  Fredrik Ronquist; Maxim Teslenko; Paul van der Mark; Daniel L Ayres; Aaron Darling; Sebastian Höhna; Bret Larget; Liang Liu; Marc A Suchard; John P Huelsenbeck
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 15.683

View more
  1 in total

1.  Are chromosome number and genome size associated with habit and environmental niche variables? Insights from the Neotropical orchids.

Authors:  Ana Paula Moraes; Thaissa Brogliato Junqueira Engel; Eliana R Forni-Martins; Fábio de Barros; Leonardo P Felix; Juliano Sarmento Cabral
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.040

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.