Literature DB >> 29504800

Auditory affective processing requires awareness.

Mikko Lähteenmäki1, Jaakko Kauramäki1, Disa A Sauter2, Lauri Nummenmaa3.   

Abstract

Recent work has challenged the previously widely accepted belief that affective processing does not require awareness and can be carried out with more limited resources than semantic processing. This debate has focused exclusively on visual perception, even though evidence from both human and animal studies suggests that existence for nonconscious affective processing would be physiologically more feasible in the auditory system. Here we contrast affective and semantic processing of nonverbal emotional vocalizations under different levels of awareness in three experiments, using explicit (two-alternative forced choice masked affective and semantic categorization tasks, Experiments 1 and 2) and implicit (masked affective and semantic priming, Experiment 3) measures. Identical stimuli and design were used in the semantic and affective tasks. Awareness was manipulated by altering stimulus-mask signal-to-noise ratio during continuous auditory masking. Stimulus awareness was measured on each trial using a four-point perceptual awareness scale. In explicit tasks, neither affective nor semantic categorization could be performed in the complete absence of awareness, while both tasks could be performed above chance level when stimuli were consciously perceived. Semantic categorization was faster than affective evaluation. When the stimuli were partially perceived, semantic categorization accuracy exceeded affective evaluation accuracy. In implicit tasks neither affective nor semantic priming occurred in the complete absence of awareness, whereas both affective and semantic priming emerged when participants were aware of the primes. We conclude that auditory semantic processing is faster than affective processing, and that both affective and semantic auditory processing are dependent on awareness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29504800     DOI: 10.1037/emo0000388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  3 in total

1.  Asymmetrical characteristics of emotional responses to pictures and sounds: Evidence from pupillometry.

Authors:  Satoshi Nakakoga; Hiroshi Higashi; Junya Muramatsu; Shigeki Nakauchi; Tetsuto Minami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Gender differences in subliminal affective face priming: A high-density ERP study.

Authors:  Mutsuhide Tanaka; Emi Yamada; Toshihiko Maekawa; Katsuya Ogata; Naomi Takamiya; Hisato Nakazono; Shozo Tobimatsu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  The Perceptual Awareness Scale-recent controversies and debates.

Authors:  Morten Overgaard; Kristian Sandberg
Journal:  Neurosci Conscious       Date:  2021-12-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.