Literature DB >> 29504080

Can Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml?

Ning Xu1, Yu-Peng Wu1, Dong-Ning Chen1, Zhi-Bin Ke1, Hai Cai1, Yong Wei1, Qing-Shui Zheng1, Jin-Bei Huang1, Xiao-Dong Li2, Xue-Yi Xue3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To explore the value of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2) for predicting prostate biopsy results in patients with prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels of 4-10 ng/ml.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed multi-parameter magnetic resonance images from 528 patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies between May 2015 and May 2017. Among them, 137 were diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa), and we further subdivided them according to pathological results into the significant PCa (S-PCa) and insignificant significant PCa (Ins-PCa) groups (121 cases were defined by surgical pathological specimen and 16 by biopsy). Age, PSA, percent free PSA, PSA density (PSAD), prostate volume (PV), and PI-RADS score were collected. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of pathological results. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to analyze the diagnostic value of PI-RADS v2 in PCa.
RESULTS: Multivariate analysis indicated that age, PV, percent free PSA, and PI-RADS score were independent predictors of biopsy findings, while only PI-RADS score was an independent predictor of S-PCa (P < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for diagnosing PCa with respect to age, PV, percent free PSA, and PI-RADS score were 0.570, 0.430, 0.589 and 0.836, respectively. The area under the curve for diagnosing S-PCa with respect to PI-RADS score was 0.732. A PI-RADS score of 3 was the best cutoff for predicting PCa, and 4 was the best cutoff for predicting S-PCa. Thus, 92.8% of patients with PI-RADS scores of 1-2 would have avoided biopsy, but at the cost of missing 2.2% of the potential PCa cases. Similarly, 83.82% of patients with a PI-RADS score ≤ 3 would have avoided biopsy, but at the cost of missing 3.3% of the potential S-PCa cases.
CONCLUSIONS: PI-RADS v2 could be used to reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies in patients with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/ml.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MpMRI; PIRADS; Prostate biopsy; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29504080     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-018-2616-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  38 in total

1.  PSA levels and cancer detection rate by centre in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  S J Otto; S M Moss; L Määttänen; M Roobol; M Zappa; V Nelen; M Kwiatkowski; A Villers; J Hugosson; A Berenguer Sanchez; H J de Koning
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  PSA density as a better predictor of prostate cancer than percent-free PSA in a repeat biopsy.

Authors:  Chuan-Shu Chen; Shian-Shiang Wang; Jian-Ri Li; Chen-Li Cheng; Chi-Rei Yang; Wen-Ming Chen; Yen-Chuan Ou; Hao-Chung Ho; Kun-Yuan Chiu; Cheng-Kuang Yang
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.743

3.  Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Moritz Kasel-Seibert; Thomas Lehmann; René Aschenbach; Felix V Guettler; Mohamed Abubrig; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Ulf Teichgraeber; Tobias Franiel
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors. A contemporary analysis.

Authors:  Patrick J Bastian; Leslie A Mangold; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) density in detecting prostate cancer in Chinese men with PSA levels of 4-10 ng/mL.

Authors:  Xiang-Yi Zheng; Li-Ping Xie; Yu-Yong Wang; Wei Ding; Kai Yang; Hua-Feng Shen; Jie Qin; Yu Bai; Zhao-Dian Chen
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Are PSA density and PSA density of the transition zone more accurate than PSA in predicting the pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer?

Authors:  Gianluca Giannarini; Cathryn A Scott; Umberto Moro; Barbara Pertoldi; Carlo A Beltrami; Cesare Selli
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.

Authors:  Satoshi Washino; Tomohisa Okochi; Kimitoshi Saito; Tsuzumi Konishi; Masaru Hirai; Yutaka Kobayashi; Tomoaki Miyagawa
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012.

Authors:  Jelle O Barentsz; Jonathan Richenberg; Richard Clements; Peter Choyke; Sadhna Verma; Geert Villeirs; Olivier Rouviere; Vibeke Logager; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Practice patterns of Korean urologists for screening and managing prostate cancer according to PSA level.

Authors:  Mun Su Chung; Seung Hwan Lee; Dong Hoon Lee; Se Joong Kim; Choung Soo Kim; Kyu Sung Lee; Jae Il Jung; Sae Woong Kim; Yil Seob Lee; Byung Ha Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging detection of prostate cancer in men with previous negative prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Matthew Truong; Thomas P Frye
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-06
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  MRI determined prostate volume and the incidence of prostate cancer on MRI-fusion biopsy: a systemic review of reported data for the last 20 years.

Authors:  Andrew S Knight; Pranav Sharma; Werner T W de Riese
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.266

2.  Analysis of the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters in the detection of prostate cancer in the first systematic biopsy combined with targeted cognitive biopsy.

Authors:  Natalia Majchrzak; Piotr Cieśliński; Tomasz Milecki; Krzysztof Twardosz; Maciej Głyda; Katarzyna Karmelita-Katulska
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2021-07-07

3.  Development and Validation of Novel Biomarkers Related to M2 Macrophages Infiltration by Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ning Xu; Ru-Nan Dong; Ting-Ting Lin; Tian Lin; Yun-Zhi Lin; Shao-Hao Chen; Jun-Ming Zhu; Zhi-Bin Ke; Fei Huang; Ye-Hui Chen; Xue-Yi Xue
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.