Literature DB >> 29503876

PIK3CA mutation is associated with increased local failure in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Natalie A Lockney1, T Jonathan Yang1, David Barron1, Emily Gelb1, Daphna Y Gelblum1, Ellen Yorke2, Weiji Shi3, Zhigang Zhang3, Andreas Rimner1, Abraham J Wu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hyperactivation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway has been associated with radioresistance. It is unclear whether such mutations confer suboptimal local control for patients who receive lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Our objective was to examine whether mutations in the EGFR/AKT/PIK3CA signaling pathway are associated with local failure (LF) after lung SBRT.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 166 patients who underwent SBRT to primary or metastatic lung lesions from 2007-2015 for whom genetic testing data was available for EGFR, AKT, and PIK3CA genes. Association between clinical factors, including molecular mutation status, and LF was evaluated.
RESULTS: Six patients (4%) had PIK3CA mutation, 36 patients (22%) had EGFR mutation, and one patient (0.6%) had AKT1 mutation. Median lesion size was 2.0 cm (range, 0.6-5.6 cm); median dose was 48Gy in 4 fractions (range, 30-70Gy in 3-10 fractions). Median follow-up for survivors was 27.3 months (range, 3.8-66.7 months). LF occurred in 16 patients (10%). On univariate analysis, PIK3CA mutation was associated with LF (HR 10.44 [95% CI 2.16-50.46], p=0.003), while tumor histology, tumor size, primary tumor site, BED and EGFR mutation were not. At one year, probability of LF in lesions with PIK3CA mutation was 20.0% vs. 2.9% in lesions without mutation (p<0.001 by log rank test).
CONCLUSION: Although the number of patients affected was small, PIK3CA mutation was significantly associated with higher risk of LF in patients undergoing lung SBRT. This association has not previously been reported for lung SBRT and indicates the need for further validation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PIK3CA; local failure; lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT); radiation resistance

Year:  2017        PMID: 29503876      PMCID: PMC5830173          DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2017.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 2405-6308


Introduction

Hyperactivation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinases (PI3K) pathway has been associated with radioresistance in vitro [1]. Following growth factor stimulation and activation of receptor tyrosine kinases such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), PI3K (consisting of regulatory and catalytic subunits) is recruited to the cellular membrane. The activated catalytic subunit of PIK3 converts phosphatidylinositol-4,5-biphosphate (PIP2) to phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-triphosphate (PIP3) and provides a docking site for the activation of Protein Kinase B (AKT), leading to downstream pro-survival signaling events [2]. Mutations in PIK3CA, the gene that encodes the catalytic subunit of PI3K, have been reported in 2–5% of non-small cell lung cancers in 6–40% of other solid tumors such as breast, liver, and colon [3], [4]. It is unknown whether mutations in the PI3K pathway confer suboptimal local control for patients who receive lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Our objective was to examine whether mutations in the EGFR/AKT/PIK3CA signaling pathway are associated with local failure (LF) after lung SBRT.

Methods

Study population

All patients who received stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the lung, for either a primary or a metastatic lung tumor, at our institution from 2007 to 2015 were reviewed following Institutional Review Board approval. There were 166 patients who met inclusion criteria: no prior in-field radiation, imaging follow-up available, and tumor genetic testing results for EGFR, AKT, and PIK3CA genes. For tumors of lung origin (n = 154), genetic testing data was required from the lung tumor undergoing SBRT. For metastatic tumors to lung (n = 12), genetic testing data from either a primary or metastatic tumor site was used (whichever was available). Genetic testing was performed either by Sequenom mass-spectrometry genotyping (n = 153) or Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT) (n = 13). Medical records were reviewed and clinical outcomes including death and LF were collected.

Radiation therapy

Patients were immobilized in an alpha cradle with arms up, or if not tolerated, in an Aquaplast mold with arms down. Radiation simulation was performed with four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) to account for tumor respiratory motion. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated on a free-breathing CT scan (with aid from positron emission tomography (PET) scan when available), and an internal target volume (ITV) was created based on GTV motion on the 4D-CT. The clinical target volume (CTV) was a 2–3 mm expansion of the ITV to account for microscopic disease. The CTV was expanded by 5 mm to create the planning target volume (PTV). Dose was prescribed to the 100% isodose line, which surrounded the PTV. Treatments were with coplanar intensity modulated 6 MV fields, and plans were calculated with inhomogeneity correction. The median dose prescribed was 48 Gy (range, 30–70 Gy), and median number of fractions was 4 (range, 3–10). Treatments were image-guided with cone-beam CT to verify positioning.

Statistical analysis

Patients were generally followed with CT scans every 3–4 months for the first two years, then every six months thereafter. Outcomes were measured from the initiation of SBRT until last follow up or death. LF was defined as unequivocal radiographic recurrence within the treatment target, based on CT and PET scans. Association between clinical factors including presence or absence of gene mutations and outcomes were tested using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess actuarial LF and overall survival. Analyses were performed with SAS release 9.4 (SAS Institute, Carry NC), R version 3.1 package survival, and IBM SPSS Statistics.

Results

Patient and tumor characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The most common tumor histology in the cohort was adenocarcinoma (92%). Six patients (4%) had PIK3CA mutation, 36 patients (21%) had EGFR mutation, and one patient (0.6%) had AKT mutation. Median lesion size was 2.0 cm (range, 0.6–5.6 cm). Median follow-up for survivors was 27.3 months (range, 3.8–66.7 months). LF was observed for 16 patients (10%).
Table 1

Patient, tumor, and radiation characteristics.

No. (%), n = 166Median (range)
Age, years75 (23–95)
Sex
 Male68 (41.0)
 Female98 (59.0)



Primary tumor site
 Lung154 (92.8)
 Gastrointestinal8 (4.8)
 Thyroid1 (0.6)
 Genitourinary3 (1.8)



Histology
 Adenocarcinoma152 (91.6)
 Squamous cell carcinoma9 (5.4)
 Other5 (3.0)
Tumor size, cm2.0 (0.6–5.6)
 <2.0 cm82 (49.7)
 ≥2.0 cm or <3.0 cm42 (25.5)
 ≥3.0 cm or <4.0 cm25 (15.2)
 ≥4.0 cm16 (9.7)



AKT1 mutation status
 Present1 (0.6)
 Absent165 (99.4)



EGFR mutation status
 Present35 (21.1)
 Absent131 (78.9)



PIK3CA mutation status
 Present6 (3.6)
 Absent160 (96.4)
SBRT total dose, Gy48 (30–70)
SBRT total fractions4 (3–10)
BED,*Gy106 (48–180)
 <100 Gy41 (24.7)
 ≥100 Gy125 (75.3)



Local failure status
 No150 (90.4)
 Yes16 (9.6)



Survival status
 Alive114 (68.7)
 Dead52 (31.3)

Abbreviations: BED = biologically effective dose; Gy = Gray; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy.

BED based on alpha/beta of 10.

Patient, tumor, and radiation characteristics. Abbreviations: BED = biologically effective dose; Gy = Gray; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy. BED based on alpha/beta of 10. On univariate analysis, PIK3CA mutation was associated with increased LF (HR 10.44 [95% CI 2.16–50.46]), p = .003 (and remained p < .05 after Bonferroni multiple testing correction), while tumor histology (adenocarcinoma vs. other), tumor size (≤2 cm vs. >2 cm), primary tumor site (lung vs. other), prescription biologically effective dose (BED) (<100 Gy versus ≥100 Gy) and EGFR mutation presence were not, Table 2. There were too few events for multivariate analysis, but all tumors with PIK3CA mutation were ≤3.2 cm in size and all but one of the tumors with PIK3CA mutation received BED >100 Gy.
Table 2

Univariate analysis for local failure after lung SBRT.

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)p-value
Patient age (continuous variable)1.04 (0.99–1.10).15
Patient sex (female vs male)0.56 (0.21–1.50).25
Histology (adenocarcinoma vs other)0.61 (0.14–2.70).52
Primary tumor site (lung vs other)0.35 (0.08–1.52).16
Tumor size (≥2.0 cm vs <2.0 cm)0.94 (0.35–2.53).90
BED* of SBRT (≥100 Gy vs <100 Gy)0.95 (0.31–2.96).93
EGFR mutation (present vs absent)0.77 (0.22–2.71).68
PIK3CA mutation (present vs absent)10.44 (2.16–50.46).004

Abbreviations: BED = biologically effective dose; Gy = Gray; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Note: For each binary variable, the second category following “vs” was the reference level (e.g. for sex, male was the reference), and the hazard ratio presents the risk of developing local failure for the first category vs the reference category (e.g. comparing to male the risk of developing local failure for female was 56%).

BED based on alpha/beta of 10.

Univariate analysis for local failure after lung SBRT. Abbreviations: BED = biologically effective dose; Gy = Gray; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy. Note: For each binary variable, the second category following “vs” was the reference level (e.g. for sex, male was the reference), and the hazard ratio presents the risk of developing local failure for the first category vs the reference category (e.g. comparing to male the risk of developing local failure for female was 56%). BED based on alpha/beta of 10. For all patients, actuarial local control at 1 year was 91.8% and at 2 years was 81.6%. At one year, probability of LF in lesions with PIK3CA mutations was 20.0% vs. 2.9% in lesions without mutations (p < .001 by log-rank test), Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier curve for local control following lung SBRT for primary or metastatic tumors to lung based on PIK3CA mutation status (p < .001).

Kaplan-Meier curve for local control following lung SBRT for primary or metastatic tumors to lung based on PIK3CA mutation status (p < .001). For all patients, overall survival at 1 year was 89.9% and at 2 years was 77.1% with a median survival of 54.3 months. PIK3CA or EGFR mutation status was not significantly associated with overall survival.

Discussion

PIK3CA mutations are an attractive area of study due to the opportunity for pharmacokinetic inhibition. Results of a phase 1 dose-escalation study of an oral PI3K inhibitor taselisib recently reported a 36% response rate for PIK3CA-mutant tumor patients with measurable disease [5]. Therapeutic strategies combining PI3K inhibition with radiation may be a topic of future investigation. Associations between PIK3CA mutations and outcomes have shown conflicting results in the literature. PIK3CA mutations have demonstrated association with improved overall survival in squamous cell lung cancer and breast cancer [6], [7] yet decreased progression-free survival in lung adenocarcinoma [8]. In a study by Boros et al. [9], next generation sequencing was performed on 57 patients with locally advanced NSCLC for EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA, NRAS, and ALK with 1 patient (2%) expressing a PIK3CA mutation. Boros et al. reported that following chemoradiation, overall survival was not significantly different among the three groups of wild-type versus EGFR-ALK versus other mutations. In our study, PIK3CA mutation status was not associated with overall survival following lung SBRT. We found PIK3CA mutation was significantly associated with higher risk of LF in patients undergoing lung SBRT. Although the number of patients affected was small, the magnitude of the effect was marked, and most affected patients developed LF despite having small tumors receiving high-BED radiation. Association between PIK3CA mutation and outcome after lung SBRT has not previously been reported. Our preliminary results should be verified by larger studies and suggest that the interaction of PIK3CA and radiation response is worthy of further investigation.

Conflict of interest statement

AW reports grant from CivaTech Oncology, Inc., outside the submitted work. AR reports grants from Varian Medical Systems and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. The other authors report no conflicts of interest.

Summary

Hyperactivation of the PI3K pathway has been associated with radioresistance in vitro; it is unclear whether PIK3CA mutations confer increased local failure following lung SBRT. We found PIK3CA mutation was associated with higher local failure following lung SBRT. This is a novel finding that needs further validation in larger cohorts.
  9 in total

1.  The Ras radiation resistance pathway.

Authors:  A K Gupta; V J Bakanauskas; G J Cerniglia; Y Cheng; E J Bernhard; R J Muschel; W G McKenna
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Taselisib, an Oral PI3K Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Dejan Juric; Ian Krop; Ramesh K Ramanathan; Timothy R Wilson; Joseph A Ware; Sandra M Sanabria Bohorquez; Heidi M Savage; Deepak Sampath; Laurent Salphati; Ray S Lin; Huan Jin; Hema Parmar; Jerry Y Hsu; Daniel D Von Hoff; José Baselga
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 3.  Strategies for co-targeting the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in NSCLC.

Authors:  Susan Heavey; Kenneth J O'Byrne; Kathy Gately
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 12.111

4.  PIK3CA mutations as prognostic factor in squamous cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Marc McGowan; Aleksandra Silye Hoven; Marius Lund-Iversen; Steinar Solberg; Åslaug Helland; Fred R Hirsch; Odd Terje Brustugun
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 5.  Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in cancer.

Authors:  Pixu Liu; Hailing Cheng; Thomas M Roberts; Jean J Zhao
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  PIK3CA mutation associates with improved outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Kevin Kalinsky; Lindsay M Jacks; Adriana Heguy; Sujata Patil; Marija Drobnjak; Umeshkumar K Bhanot; Cyrus V Hedvat; Tiffany A Traina; David Solit; William Gerald; Mary Ellen Moynahan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 7.  Mutation of the PIK3CA oncogene in human cancers.

Authors:  B Karakas; K E Bachman; B H Park
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-02-27       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Prognostic value of tumor mutations in radically treated locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Angela Boros; Ludovic Lacroix; Benjamin Lacas; Julien Adam; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Caroline Caramella; David Planchard; Vincent de Montpreville; Eric Deutsch; Antonin Levy; Benjamin Besse; Cécile Le Pechoux
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-11

9.  PIK3CA gene mutation associated with poor prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Lina Zhang; Lei Shi; Xiaoting Zhao; Yue Wang; Wentao Yue
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 4.147

  9 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy as a tool to elicit clinically actionable signalling pathways in cancer.

Authors:  Giulia Petroni; Lewis C Cantley; Laura Santambrogio; Silvia C Formenti; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  KEAP1/NFE2L2 Mutations Predict Lung Cancer Radiation Resistance That Can Be Targeted by Glutaminase Inhibition.

Authors:  Michael S Binkley; Young-Jun Jeon; Monica Nesselbush; Everett J Moding; Barzin Y Nabet; Diego Almanza; Christian Kunder; Henning Stehr; Christopher H Yoo; Siyeon Rhee; Michael Xiang; Jacob J Chabon; Emily Hamilton; David M Kurtz; Linda Gojenola; Susie Grant Owen; Ryan B Ko; June Ho Shin; Peter G Maxim; Natalie S Lui; Leah M Backhus; Mark F Berry; Joseph B Shrager; Kavitha J Ramchandran; Sukhmani K Padda; Millie Das; Joel W Neal; Heather A Wakelee; Ash A Alizadeh; Billy W Loo; Maximilian Diehn
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 38.272

Review 3.  Radiosensitising Cancer Using Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase (PI3K), Protein Kinase B (AKT) or Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Inhibitors.

Authors:  Kasun Wanigasooriya; Robert Tyler; Joao D Barros-Silva; Yashashwi Sinha; Tariq Ismail; Andrew D Beggs
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  PIK3CA Gene Mutations in Solid Malignancies: Association with Clinicopathological Parameters and Prognosis.

Authors:  Ali Alqahtani; Hazem S K Ayesh; Hafez Halawani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Genomic Analyses for Predictors of Response to Chemoradiation in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Leo Y Luo; Robert M Samstein; Rosalind Dick-Godfrey; Baho Sidiqi; Chunyu Wang; Federica Oro; Mark Sonnick; Paul K Paik; Jamie E Chaft; Narek Shaverdian; Daniel R Gomez; Andreas Rimner; Abraham J Wu
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-11-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.