| Literature DB >> 29503876 |
Natalie A Lockney1, T Jonathan Yang1, David Barron1, Emily Gelb1, Daphna Y Gelblum1, Ellen Yorke2, Weiji Shi3, Zhigang Zhang3, Andreas Rimner1, Abraham J Wu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Hyperactivation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway has been associated with radioresistance. It is unclear whether such mutations confer suboptimal local control for patients who receive lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Our objective was to examine whether mutations in the EGFR/AKT/PIK3CA signaling pathway are associated with local failure (LF) after lung SBRT.Entities:
Keywords: PIK3CA; local failure; lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT); radiation resistance
Year: 2017 PMID: 29503876 PMCID: PMC5830173 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2017.11.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol ISSN: 2405-6308
Patient, tumor, and radiation characteristics.
| No. (%), n = 166 | Median (range) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 75 (23–95) | |
| Male | 68 (41.0) | |
| Female | 98 (59.0) | |
| Lung | 154 (92.8) | |
| Gastrointestinal | 8 (4.8) | |
| Thyroid | 1 (0.6) | |
| Genitourinary | 3 (1.8) | |
| Adenocarcinoma | 152 (91.6) | |
| Squamous cell carcinoma | 9 (5.4) | |
| Other | 5 (3.0) | |
| 2.0 (0.6–5.6) | ||
| <2.0 cm | 82 (49.7) | |
| ≥2.0 cm or <3.0 cm | 42 (25.5) | |
| ≥3.0 cm or <4.0 cm | 25 (15.2) | |
| ≥4.0 cm | 16 (9.7) | |
| Present | 1 (0.6) | |
| Absent | 165 (99.4) | |
| Present | 35 (21.1) | |
| Absent | 131 (78.9) | |
| Present | 6 (3.6) | |
| Absent | 160 (96.4) | |
| SBRT total dose, Gy | 48 (30–70) | |
| SBRT total fractions | 4 (3–10) | |
| 106 (48–180) | ||
| <100 Gy | 41 (24.7) | |
| ≥100 Gy | 125 (75.3) | |
| No | 150 (90.4) | |
| Yes | 16 (9.6) | |
| Alive | 114 (68.7) | |
| Dead | 52 (31.3) | |
Abbreviations: BED = biologically effective dose; Gy = Gray; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy.
BED based on alpha/beta of 10.
Univariate analysis for local failure after lung SBRT.
| Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|
| Patient age (continuous variable) | 1.04 (0.99–1.10) | .15 |
| Patient sex (female vs male) | 0.56 (0.21–1.50) | .25 |
| Histology (adenocarcinoma vs other) | 0.61 (0.14–2.70) | .52 |
| Primary tumor site (lung vs other) | 0.35 (0.08–1.52) | .16 |
| Tumor size (≥2.0 cm vs <2.0 cm) | 0.94 (0.35–2.53) | .90 |
| BED | 0.95 (0.31–2.96) | .93 |
| EGFR mutation (present vs absent) | 0.77 (0.22–2.71) | .68 |
| PIK3CA mutation (present vs absent) | 10.44 (2.16–50.46) | .004 |
Abbreviations: BED = biologically effective dose; Gy = Gray; SBRT = stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Note: For each binary variable, the second category following “vs” was the reference level (e.g. for sex, male was the reference), and the hazard ratio presents the risk of developing local failure for the first category vs the reference category (e.g. comparing to male the risk of developing local failure for female was 56%).
BED based on alpha/beta of 10.
Fig. 1Kaplan-Meier curve for local control following lung SBRT for primary or metastatic tumors to lung based on PIK3CA mutation status (p < .001).