| Literature DB >> 29503723 |
D A Orwig1, P Boucher2, I Paynter2,3, E Saenz2, Z Li2, C Schaaf2.
Abstract
Contemporary terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) is being used widely in forest ecology applications to examine ecosystem properties at increasing spatial and temporal scales. Harvard Forest (HF) in Petersham, MA, USA, is a long-term ecological research (LTER) site, a National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) location and contains a 35 ha plot which is part of Smithsonian Institution's Forest Global Earth Observatory (ForestGEO). The combination of long-term field plots, eddy flux towers and the detailed past historical records has made HF very appealing for a variety of remote sensing studies. Terrestrial laser scanners, including three pioneering research instruments: the Echidna Validation Instrument, the Dual-Wavelength Echidna Lidar and the Compact Biomass Lidar, have already been used both independently and in conjunction with airborne laser scanning data and forest census data to characterize forest dynamics. TLS approaches include three-dimensional reconstructions of a plot over time, establishing the impact of ice storm damage on forest canopy structure, and characterizing eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) canopy health affected by an invasive insect, the hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae). Efforts such as those deployed at HF are demonstrating the power of TLS as a tool for monitoring ecological dynamics, identifying emerging forest health issues, measuring forest biomass and capturing ecological data relevant to other disciplines. This paper highlights various aspects of the ForestGEO plot that are important to current TLS work, the potential for exchange between forest ecology and TLS, and emphasizes the strength of combining TLS data with long-term ecological field data to create emerging opportunities for scientific study.Entities:
Keywords: ForestGEO plot; Harvard Forest; forest dynamics; hemlock woolly adelgid; lidar; terrestrial laser scanning
Year: 2018 PMID: 29503723 PMCID: PMC5829185 DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2017.0044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interface Focus ISSN: 2042-8898 Impact factor: 3.906
Figure 1.The 500×700 m ForestGEO plot located on the Prospect Hill tract of HF, showing locations of three eddy flux towers, old forest roads, stone walls (denoted by dotted lines) and the central swamp area.
Figure 2.CBL scans of progressive mortality in the HF ForestGEO plot. (a) 0% hemlock mortality: intact branches distributed from the canopy to the ground with needles. (b) 15% hemlock mortality: loss of needles on lower branches and beginning of understorey vegetation establishment. (c) 31% hemlock mortality: branches bare, canopy damage and new understorey growing in the canopy gaps. Note: Each scan is taken from the centre of a 20×20 m plot, colour-coded and labelled here as a, b and c and seen on figure 3. Scans taken during summer 2016 and rendered using CloudCompare (www.cloudcompare.org).
Figure 3.Results of the 2016 hemlock mortality assessment within 4 ha of the 35 ha HF ForestGEO plot. Although dead hemlocks were recorded from throughout the study area, there were concentrated areas of mortality in the southwest corner and middle portion of the study area. Over 60% of smaller stems (less than 10 cm DBH) died in the area although larger trees also died, including two over 75 cm DBH.
Figure 4.Conceptual framework for the investigation and improvement of TLS sampling scheme design and parameters on the error observed in estimation of ecological variables of interest.