| Literature DB >> 29503202 |
Yonghong Chen1, Shujuan Zheng1, Luis Tecedor1, Beverly L Davidson2.
Abstract
Sulfamidase (<span class="Disease">SGSH) deficiency causes <span class="Disease">mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA (MPS IIIA), a lysosomal storage disease (LSD) that affects the CNS. In earlier work in LSD mice and dog models, we exploited the utility of adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) to transduce brain ventricular lining cells (ependyma) for secretion of lysosomal hydrolases into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), with subsequent distribution of enzyme throughout the brain resulting in improved cognition and extending lifespan. A critical feature of this approach is efficient secretion of the expressed enzyme from transduced cells, for delivery by CSF to nontransduced cells. Surprisingly, we found that SGSH was poorly secreted from cells, resulting in retention of the expressed product. Using site-directed mutagenesis of native SGSH, we identified an improved secretion variant that also displayed enhanced uptake properties that were mannose-6-phosphate receptor independent. In studies in MPS IIIA-deficient mice, ependymal transduction with AAVs expressing variant SGSH improved spatial learning and reduced memory deficits, substrate accumulation, and astrogliosis. Secondary lysosomal enzyme elevations in the CSF and brain parenchyma were also resolved. In contrast, ependymal transduction with AAVs expressing wild-type SGSH had significantly lower CSF SGSH levels and limited impacts on behavior. These results demonstrate the utility of a previously undescribed SGSH variant for improved MPS IIIA brain gene therapy.Entities:
Keywords: MPS; gene therapy; lysosomal storage disease; protein engineering
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29503202 PMCID: PMC6079371 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.01.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Ther ISSN: 1525-0016 Impact factor: 11.454
Figure 1Comparison of the Secretory Properties of Various Lysosomal Enzymes In Vitro and the Effects of Abrogating M6P Sites on SGSH Secretion and Activity
(A) HEK293 cells were transfected with plasmids expressing SGSH, TPP1, or β-glu. After 72 hr, cells and media were harvested and enzyme activities assessed by enzyme activity assay; n = 3 biological replicates, in triplicate. Data represent mean ± SD. (B) Five SGSH variants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis to introduce N-to-Q mutations at N-glycosylation sites at amino acids (aa) 41, 142, 151, 264, and 413 as indicated. (C) Activity levels of WT or variant SGSH after transfection of expression vectors into HEK293 cells. Cells and media were collected and assayed for SGSH enzyme activity 72 hr after transfection; n = 3 biological replicates, in triplicate. Data represent mean ± SD.
Figure 2Temporal Analysis of WT SGSH and SGSHv4 Activity
HEK293 cells were transfected with vectors expressing WT SGSH or SGSHv4, the (A) media and (B and C) cells harvested at the indicated time points, and SGSH activity (A and B) or protein levels (C) assessed; n = 3 biological replicates, in triplicate. Data represent mean ± SD. (D) The ratio of WT SGSH to SGSHv4 protein levels in the cell lysate as assessed by western blot. Both precursor and mature forms were evaluated; n = 3 biological replicates. Data represent mean ± SD. (E) Representative western blot (of four biological replicates) indicating SGSH and SGSHv4 protein levels in the indicated fractions isolated after gradient centrifugation. LAMP1, Bip, and Grasp 65 were used to identify enrichment of lysosomal, ER, and Golgi markers, respectively. Asterisk (*) indicates unglycosylated SGSH; arrowhead indicates glycosylated SGSH. PNF, post-nuclear fraction.
Figure 3SGSH Uptake by MPS IIIA Patient Fibroblasts
(A) Conditioned media containing either WT SGSH or SGSHv4, plus or minus M6P, were applied to MPS IIIA patient fibroblasts and enzyme activity in cell lysates assessed 6 hr later. Data represent mean ± SD. (B) Immunohistochemistry for human SGSH after application of conditioned media to MPS IIIA fibroblasts. Conditioned media as in (A) was applied for 6 hr, after which the cells were fixed, stained for human SGSH, and imaged. Insets are enlargements of sites marked with an asterisk (*). Scale bar, 25 μm. (C) Conditioned media containing SGSH or SGSHv4 were applied to MPS IIIA patient fibroblasts for 6 hr, and SGSH protein levels in cell lysates were analyzed by western blot. For all panels, n = 3 biological replicates, in triplicate.
Figure 4AAV.SGSHv4 Improves Behavioral Deficits in MPS IIIA Mice
Mice (8 wk old) were injected with AAV.SGSH or AAV.SGSH into lateral ventricle and animals tested in the Morris water maze 12 weeks later. (A) Latency to find the platform. (B) Time spent in the target quadrant on day 6. (C) Distance traveled in target quadrant on day 6. n = 14 for all groups. Data are mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Figure 5SGSH Activity in the CSF and Brain Tissue Lysates after rAAV.SGSH or rAAV.SGSHv4 Delivery
Mice (8 wk old) were injected with AAV.SGSH or AAV.SGSH into the lateral ventricle and CSF collected 14 weeks later, after which the mice were euthanized and tissues collected for SGSH activity assay. (A) SGSH activity in CSF pooled from four to six mice. (B) SGSH activity in brain parenchyma from the hippocampus (HPC), striatum (Str), occipital cortex (OccCx), and cerebellum (Cb). n = 6. Data represent mean ± SD. ***p < 0.001. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
Figure 6AAV.SGSHv4 Alleviates Neuropathology in MPS IIIA Mice
Mice (8 wk old) were injected with AAV.SGSH or AAV.SGSHv4 into the lateral ventricle. Animals were euthanized 14 weeks later, and tissues were harvested for analysis of impact on neuropathological readouts. (A) Quantification of GAG in parenchyma from tissues harvested contralateral to the injection site: hippocampus (HPC), striatum (Str), occipital cortex (OccCx), and cerebellum (Cb). n = 4–6. Data represent mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. (B) Glial astrocytosis measured by immunoreactivity for GFAP in sections collected from hemispheres unilateral to the injection site. Representative photomicrographs are from the cortex (Cx) and striatum (Str); n = 3 mice per group, three sections/mouse. Scale bar, 100 μm. Insets show isolated GFAP-immunoreactive glia. (C and D) Threshold image analysis was used to measure the fraction of total area positive for GFAP immunoreactivity in the noted cortical layers (C) and striatum (D). Data represent mean ± SEM, three mice/group and three sections/mouse. For each section, analyses were done on three random fields (100 μm × 100 μm) in the indicated cortical layers and 12 random fields (100 μm × 100 μm) in the striatum. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test. (E and F) β-Glu activity in the CSF and brain tissue lysates after rAAV.SGSH or rAAV.SGSHv4 delivery. (E) β-Glu activity in CSF pooled from four to six mice. (F) β-Glu activity in brain parenchyma from indicated regions. n = 6. Data are mean ± SD. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.