Literature DB >> 29502872

Natural history of portal vein embolization before liver resection: a 23-year analysis of intention-to-treat results.

Fernando A Alvarez1, Denis Castaing2, Rodrigo Figueroa1, Marc Antoine Allard3, Nicolas Golse2, Gabriella Pittau1, Oriana Ciacio1, Antonio Sa Cunha3, Daniel Cherqui2, Daniel Azoulay4, René Adam3, Eric Vibert5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Portal vein embolization (PVE) use is nowadays debated due to the risk of technical or biological unresectability after the period of time needed to achieve future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of PVE in a single high-volume hepatobiliary center, with emphasis in the feasibility to achieve tumor resection.
METHODS: Patients undergoing PVE before major hepatectomy at our institution between 1993 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 431 patients formed the study population. Morbidity and mortality rates of PVE were 16.7% and 0.2% respectively. Morbidity was similar between percutaneous and ileocolic approaches or between histoacryl and ethanol as embolization materials (P > 0.05). On the contrary, the percutaneous ipsilateral approach was associated with significantly less complications than the contralateral approach (10.3% vs 19.4%; P = 0.024). Almost all patients (96%) achieved sufficient FLR volume after embolization, but only 66% finally underwent planned liver resection. Disease progression was the most common cause of unresectability (67%). Patients with extrahepatic biliary tumors experienced significantly higher unresectability rates compared to other entities (45.1% vs 31.4%; P = 0.019).
CONCLUSION: PVE was not followed by hepatectomy in 34% of our patients. Biliary tumors displayed the higher dropout rates after PVE and the higher chances of tumor progression preventing curative resection. Although PVE may be performed with acceptable morbidity, PVE-related complications prevented curative resection in 5% of patients. Careful multidisciplinary selection is crucial to avoid PVE overuse in technically resectable patients who will experience a not negligible risk of futile use and non-therapeutic laparotomy.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29502872     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.12.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  5 in total

1.  Simultaneous portohepatic vein embolization a radiological: a short cut to associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy?

Authors:  Ka Wing Ma; Albert Chi Yan Chan
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 2.  Imaging-guided interventions modulating portal venous flow: Evidence and controversies.

Authors:  Roberto Cannella; Lambros Tselikas; Fréderic Douane; François Cauchy; Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou; Rafael Duran; Maxime Ronot
Journal:  JHEP Rep       Date:  2022-04-04

3.  Optimizing future remnant liver prior to major hepatectomies: increasing volume while decreasing morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Hoylan Fernandez; Silvio Nadalin; Giuliano Testa
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 4.  Leaping the Boundaries in Laparoscopic Liver Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Gianluca Cassese; Ho-Seong Han; Boram Lee; Hae Won Lee; Jai Young Cho; Roberto Troisi
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Portal vein embolization with absolute ethanol to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant.

Authors:  Cositha Santhakumar; William Ormiston; John L McCall; Adam Bartlett; David Duncan; Andrew Holden
Journal:  CVIR Endovasc       Date:  2022-07-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.