Literature DB >> 29502735

Validation of the 3D Skin Comet assay using full thickness skin models: Transferability and reproducibility.

Kerstin Reisinger1, Veronika Blatz2, Joep Brinkmann3, Thomas R Downs4, Anja Fischer1, Frank Henkler3, Sebastian Hoffmann5, Cyrille Krul6, Manfred Liebsch3, Andreas Luch3, Ralph Pirow3, Astrid A Reus7, Markus Schulz2, Stefan Pfuhler4.   

Abstract

Recently revised OECD Testing Guidelines highlight the importance of considering the first site-of-contact when investigating the genotoxic hazard. Thus far, only in vivo approaches are available to address the dermal route of exposure. The 3D Skin Comet and Reconstructed Skin Micronucleus (RSMN) assays intend to close this gap in the in vitro genotoxicity toolbox by investigating DNA damage after topical application. This represents the most relevant route of exposure for a variety of compounds found in household products, cosmetics, and industrial chemicals. The comet assay methodology is able to detect both chromosomal damage and DNA lesions that may give rise to gene mutations, thereby complementing the RSMN which detects only chromosomal damage. Here, the comet assay was adapted to two reconstructed full thickness human skin models: the EpiDerm™- and Phenion® Full-Thickness Skin Models. First, tissue-specific protocols for the isolation of single cells and the general comet assay were transferred to European and US-American laboratories. After establishment of the assay, the protocol was then further optimized with appropriate cytotoxicity measurements and the use of aphidicolin, a DNA repair inhibitor, to improve the assay's sensitivity. In the first phase of an ongoing validation study eight chemicals were tested in three laboratories each using the Phenion® Full-Thickness Skin Model, informing several validation modules. Ultimately, the 3D Skin Comet assay demonstrated a high predictive capacity and good intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility with four laboratories reaching a 100% predictivity and the fifth yielding 70%. The data are intended to demonstrate the use of the 3D Skin Comet assay as a new in vitro tool for following up on positive findings from the standard in vitro genotoxicity test battery for dermally applied chemicals, ultimately helping to drive the regulatory acceptance of the assay. To expand the database, the validation will continue by testing an additional 22 chemicals.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comet assay; DNA damage; Dermal exposure; In vitro genotoxicity; Phenion(®)FT; Skin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29502735     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2018.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen        ISSN: 1383-5718            Impact factor:   2.873


  10 in total

1.  Human-Derived In Vitro Models Used for Skin Toxicity Testing Under REACh.

Authors:  Susanne N Kolle; Robert Landsiedel
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2021

Review 2.  Comparison of methods used for evaluation of mutagenicity/genotoxicity of model chemicals - parabens.

Authors:  J Chrz; B Hošíková; L Svobodová; D Očadlíková; H Kolářová; M Dvořáková; K Kejlová; L Malina; G Jírová; A Vlková; M Mannerström
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 1.881

3.  Characterization of a New Reconstructed Full Thickness Skin Model, T-Skin™, and its Application for Investigations of Anti-Aging Compounds.

Authors:  Michel Bataillon; Damien Lelièvre; Adeline Chapuis; Fabienne Thillou; Jean Baptiste Autourde; Steven Durand; Nathalie Boyera; Anne-Sophie Rigaudeau; Isabelle Besné; Christian Pellevoisin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Effect of 2-acetylaminofluorene and its genotoxic metabolites on DNA adduct formation and DNA damage in 3D reconstructed human skin tissue models.

Authors:  Thomas R Downs; Volker M Arlt; Brenda C Barnett; Ryan Posgai; Stefan Pfuhler
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin micronucleus (RSMN) assay: an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays.

Authors:  Stefan Pfuhler; Thomas R Downs; Nicola J Hewitt; Sebastian Hoffmann; Greg C Mun; Gladys Ouedraogo; Shambhu Roy; Rodger D Curren; Marilyn J Aardema
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Current EU regulatory requirements for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products: challenges and opportunities for introducing new approach methodologies.

Authors:  Francesca Pistollato; Federica Madia; Raffaella Corvi; Sharon Munn; Elise Grignard; Alicia Paini; Andrew Worth; Anna Bal-Price; Pilar Prieto; Silvia Casati; Elisabet Berggren; Stephanie K Bopp; Valérie Zuang
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  The hen's egg test for micronucleus induction (HET-MN): validation data set.

Authors:  Kerstin Reisinger; Dagmar Fieblinger; Andreas Heppenheimer; Jürgen Kreutz; Manfred Liebsch; Andreas Luch; Katrin Maul; Albrecht Poth; Pamela Strauch; Eva Dony; Markus Schulz; Thorsten Wolf; Ralph Pirow
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.954

8.  Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays.

Authors:  Stefan Pfuhler; Ralph Pirow; Thomas R Downs; Andrea Haase; Nicola Hewitt; Andreas Luch; Marion Merkel; Claudia Petrick; André Said; Monika Schäfer-Korting; Kerstin Reisinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 9.  Implementing organ-on-chip in a next-generation risk assessment of chemicals: a review.

Authors:  Katharina S Nitsche; Iris Müller; Sophie Malcomber; Paul L Carmichael; Hans Bouwmeester
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Organoids for toxicology and genetic toxicology: applications with drugs and prospects for environmental carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Angela L Caipa Garcia; Volker M Arlt; David H Phillips
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.954

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.