Melanie L Kornides1, Annie-Laurie McRee2, Melissa B Gilkey3. 1. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: Melanie.Kornides@mail.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 3. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Mass.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Parental declination contributes to low human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage among US adolescents, resulting in missed opportunities for cancer prevention. We sought to characterize parents' acceptance of HPV vaccination after declination ("secondary acceptance"). METHODS: In September 2016, we conducted an online survey with a national sample of parents of children ages 11 to 17 years. For those who reported having ever declined HPV vaccination for their children (n = 494), our survey assessed whether they accepted the vaccine at a subsequent visit. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess correlates of secondary acceptance. RESULTS: Overall, 45% of parents reported secondary acceptance of HPV vaccination, and an additional 24% intended to vaccinate in the next 12 months. In multivariable analyses, secondary acceptance was associated with receiving follow-up counseling about HPV vaccination from a health care provider (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-3.28). However, only 53% of parents overall reported receiving such counseling. Secondary acceptance was also associated with receiving a higher quality HPV vaccine recommendation from a provider during the initial discussion and greater satisfaction with provider communication, as well as higher vaccination confidence. Among the reasons for secondary acceptance, parents most commonly reported the child getting older (45%), learning more about HPV vaccine (34%), and receiving a provider recommendation (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest secondary acceptance of HPV vaccination is common, with more than two-thirds of parents in this national sample accepting or intending to accept HPV vaccination after declination. Providers should seek to motivate secondary acceptance by delivering repeated, high-quality recommendations for HPV vaccination.
OBJECTIVE: Parental declination contributes to low human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage among US adolescents, resulting in missed opportunities for cancer prevention. We sought to characterize parents' acceptance of HPV vaccination after declination ("secondary acceptance"). METHODS: In September 2016, we conducted an online survey with a national sample of parents of children ages 11 to 17 years. For those who reported having ever declined HPV vaccination for their children (n = 494), our survey assessed whether they accepted the vaccine at a subsequent visit. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess correlates of secondary acceptance. RESULTS: Overall, 45% of parents reported secondary acceptance of HPV vaccination, and an additional 24% intended to vaccinate in the next 12 months. In multivariable analyses, secondary acceptance was associated with receiving follow-up counseling about HPV vaccination from a health care provider (odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-3.28). However, only 53% of parents overall reported receiving such counseling. Secondary acceptance was also associated with receiving a higher quality HPV vaccine recommendation from a provider during the initial discussion and greater satisfaction with provider communication, as well as higher vaccination confidence. Among the reasons for secondary acceptance, parents most commonly reported the child getting older (45%), learning more about HPV vaccine (34%), and receiving a provider recommendation (33%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest secondary acceptance of HPV vaccination is common, with more than two-thirds of parents in this national sample accepting or intending to accept HPV vaccination after declination. Providers should seek to motivate secondary acceptance by delivering repeated, high-quality recommendations for HPV vaccination.
Authors: Melissa B Gilkey; Brooke E Magnus; Paul L Reiter; Annie-Laurie McRee; Amanda F Dempsey; Noel T Brewer Journal: Vaccine Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Mandy A Allison; Laura P Hurley; Lauri Markowitz; Lori A Crane; Michaela Brtnikova; Brenda L Beaty; Megan Snow; Janine Cory; Shannon Stokley; Jill Roark; Allison Kempe Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2016-01-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Sarah Reagan-Steiner; David Yankey; Jenny Jeyarajah; Laurie D Elam-Evans; C Robinette Curtis; Jessica MacNeil; Lauri E Markowitz; James A Singleton Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Melissa B Gilkey; William A Calo; Jennifer L Moss; Parth D Shah; Macary W Marciniak; Noel T Brewer Journal: Vaccine Date: 2016-01-24 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Melissa B Gilkey; Annie-Laurie McRee; Brooke E Magnus; Paul L Reiter; Amanda F Dempsey; Noel T Brewer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Andreia B Alexander; Nathan W Stupiansky; Mary A Ott; Debby Herbenick; Michael Reece; Gregory D Zimet Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2012-12-14 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Melissa B Gilkey; Divya Mohan; Ellen M Janssen; Annie-Laurie McRee; Melanie L Kornides; John F P Bridges Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2019-05-07 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Parth D Shah; William A Calo; Melissa B Gilkey; Marcella H Boynton; Susan Alton Dailey; Karen G Todd; Meagan O Robichaud; Marjorie A Margolis; Noel T Brewer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Janita Pak Chun Chau; Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo; Laveeza Butt; Vivian Wing Yan Lee; Grace Chung Yan Lui; Alexander Yuk Lun Lau Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2022-07-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Marjorie A Margolis; Noel T Brewer; Marcella H Boynton; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Brian G Southwell; Melissa B Gilkey Journal: Vaccine Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Mary Kate Kelly; Robert W Grundmeier; Alisa J Stephens-Shields; Russell Localio; Laura P Shone; Margaret Wright; Jennifer Steffes; Sharon G Humiston; Cynthia Rand; Christina Albertin; Abigail Breck; Dianna E Abney; Greta McFarland; Peter G Szilagyi; Alexander G Fiks Journal: Vaccine Date: 2020-06-12 Impact factor: 3.641