Literature DB >> 29502498

Perfusion imaging and recurrent cerebrovascular events in intracranial atherosclerotic disease or carotid occlusion.

Daniel C Sacchetti1, Shawna M Cutting1, Ryan A McTaggart2,3, Andrew D Chang1, Morgan Hemendinger1, Brian Mac Grory1, Matthew S Siket4, Tina Burton1, Bradford Thompson1,2, Sara K Rostanski5, Shyam Prabhakaran6, Joshua Z Willey7, Randolph S Marshall7, Mitchell Sv Elkind7,8, Pooja Khatri9, Karen L Furie1, Mahesh V Jayaraman1,2,3, Shadi Yaghi1.   

Abstract

Background Large vessel disease stroke subtype carries the highest risk of early recurrent stroke. In this study we aim to look at the association between impaired perfusion and early stroke recurrence in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease or total cervical carotid occlusion. Methods This is a retrospective study from a comprehensive stroke center where we included consecutive patients 18 years or older with intracranial atherosclerotic disease or total cervical carotid occlusion admitted with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke within 24 h from symptom onset with National Institute Health Stroke Scale < 15, between 1 December 2016 and 30 June 2017. Patients with (1) evidence of ≥ 50% stenosis of a large intracranial artery or total carotid artery occlusion, (2) symptoms referable to the territory of the affected artery, and (3) perfusion imaging data using the RAPID processing software were included. The primary predictor was unfavorable perfusion imaging defined as Tmax > 6 s mismatch volume (penumbra volume-infarct volume) of 15 ml or more. The outcome was recurrent cerebrovascular events at 90 days defined as worsening or new neurological symptoms in the absence of a nonvascular cause attributable to the decline, or new infarct or infarct extension in the territory of the affected artery. We used Cox proportional hazards models to determine the association between impaired perfusion and recurrent cerebrovascular events. Results Sixty-two patients met our inclusion criteria; mean age 66.4 ± 13.1 years, 64.5% male (40/62) and 50.0% (31/62) with intracranial atherosclerotic disease. When compared to patients with favorable perfusion pattern, patients with unfavorable perfusion pattern were more likely to have recurrent cerebrovascular events (55.6% (10/18) versus 9.1% (4/44), p < 0.001). This association persisted after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted hazard ratio 10.44, 95% confidence interval 2.30-47.42, p = 0.002). Conclusion Perfusion mismatch predicts recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic disease or total cervical carotid occlusion. Studies are needed to determine the utility of revascularization strategies in this patient population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Large vessel disease; carotid occlusion; intracranial atherosclerotic disease; perfusion imaging; recurrent events; reperfusion; stroke risk

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29502498     DOI: 10.1177/1747493018764075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  6 in total

1.  Peri-procedural stroke or death in stenting of symptomatic severe intracranial stenosis.

Authors:  Shadi Yaghi; Pooja Khatri; Adam de Havenon; Sharon Yeatts; Andrew D Chang; Shawna Cutting; Brian Mac Grory; Tina Burton; Mahesh V Jayaraman; Ryan A McTaggart; David Fiorella; Colin Derdeyn; Osama O Zaidat; Seena Dehkharghani; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Karen Furie; Shyam Prahbakaran; David Liebeskind
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 5.836

2.  Intracranial Atherosclerosis: A Disease of Functional, not Anatomic Stenosis? How Trans-Stenotic Pressure Gradients Can Help Guide Treatment.

Authors:  Mario Zanaty; James D Rossen; Jorge A Roa; Daichi Nakagawa; Joseph S Hudson; Sami Al Kasab; Kaustubh Limaye; Khaled Asi; Sudeepta Dandapat; Pascal Jabbour; Edgar A Samaniego; David M Hasan
Journal:  Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.703

3.  Impaired Distal Perfusion Predicts Length of Hospital Stay in Patients with Symptomatic Middle Cerebral Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Shadi Yaghi; Adam de Havenon; Tristan Honda; Jason D Hinman; Radoslav Raychev; Latisha K Sharma; Song Kim; Edward Feldmann; Jose G Romano; Shyam Prabhakaran; David S Liebeskind
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Risk Assessment of the Door-In-Door-Out Process at Primary Stroke Centers for Patients With Acute Stroke Requiring Transfer to Comprehensive Stroke Centers.

Authors:  Jane L Holl; Rebeca Khorzad; Rebecca Zobel; Amy Barnard; Maureen Hillman; Alejandro Vargas; Christopher Richards; Scott Mendelson; Shyam Prabhakaran
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Vertebrobasilar Stroke: Association Between Infarction Patterns and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Angiography Flow State.

Authors:  Ahmad A Ballout; Richard B Libman; Julia R Schneider; Karen Black; Panagiotis Sideras; Jason J Wang; Timothy G White; Amir R Dehdashti; Henry H Woo; Jeffrey M Katz
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 6.106

Review 6.  Recurrent stroke risk in intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Authors:  Ahmad A Ballout; David S Liebeskind
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 4.086

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.