Literature DB >> 29502156

Disruption or innovation? A qualitative descriptive study on the use of electronic patient-physician communication in patients with advanced cancer.

Teja Voruganti1, Amna Husain2,3, Eva Grunfeld1,4, Fiona Webster5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the advanced cancer context, care coordination is often inadequate, leading to suboptimal continuity of care. We evaluated an electronic web-based tool which assembles the patient, their caregivers, and their healthcare providers in a virtual space for team-based communication. We sought to understand participant perceptions on electronic communication in general and the added value of the new tool in particular.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative descriptive study with participants (patients, caregivers, cancer physicians) who participated in a 3-month pilot trial evaluating the tool. Interviews were thematically analyzed and the perspectives from patients, caregivers, and cancer physicians were triangulated. Interviews from six patients, five of their caregivers, and seven cancer physicians conducted alongside monthly outcome assessments were analyzed.
RESULTS: We identified five themes relating participants' perspectives on electronic communication to their experience of care: (1) apparent gaps in care, (2) uncertainty in defining the circle of care, (3) relational aspects of communication, (4) incongruence between technology and social norms of patient-physician communication, and (5) appreciation but apprehension about the team-based communication tool for improving the experience of care.
CONCLUSIONS: The potential of tools for electronic communication to bring together a team of healthcare providers with the patient and caregivers is significant but may pose new challenges to existing team structure and interpersonal dynamics. Patients and physicians were worried about the impact that electronic communication may have on the patient-physician relationship. Implementation approaches, which build on the relationship and integrate the team as a whole, could positively position electronic communication to enhance the team-based care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical collaboration; Secure messaging; Team-based care; eHealth evaluation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29502156     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4103-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  33 in total

Review 1.  The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management.

Authors:  E H Wagner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-26

2.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

3.  The patient-physician relationship. Patient-physician communication during outpatient palliative treatment visits: an observational study.

Authors:  S B Detmar; M J Muller; L D Wever; J H Schornagel; N K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  Eric B Larson; Xin Yao
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Jill Russell
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Are anxiety and depressed mood related to physical symptom burden? A study in hospitalized advanced cancer patients.

Authors:  S C C M Teunissen; A de Graeff; E E Voest; J C J M de Haes
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.762

7.  Experienced continuity of care when patients see multiple clinicians: a qualitative metasummary.

Authors:  Jeannie L Haggerty; Danièle Roberge; George K Freeman; Christine Beaulieu
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Identifying professionals' needs in integrating electronic pain monitoring in community palliative care services: An interview study.

Authors:  Sally Taylor; Matthew J Allsop; Hilary L Bekker; Michael I Bennett; Bridgette M Bewick
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 9.  The effect of patient portals on quality outcomes and its implications to meaningful use: a systematic review.

Authors:  Clemens Scott Kruse; Katy Bolton; Greg Freriks
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Provider connectedness and communication patterns: extending continuity of care in the context of the circle of care.

Authors:  Morgan Price; Francis Y Lau
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  How technology can improve communication and health outcomes in patients with advanced cancer: an integrative review.

Authors:  Natasha Ansari; Christina M Wilson; Mallorie B Heneghan; Kathie Supiano; Kathi Mooney
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  How technology impacts communication between cancer patients and their health care providers: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Safa ElKefi; Onur Asan
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.046

3.  A Clinical Communication Tool (Loop) for Team-Based Care in Pediatric and Adult Care Settings: Hybrid Mixed Methods Implementation Study.

Authors:  Amna Husain; Eyal Cohen; Raluca Dubrowski; Trevor Jamieson; Allison Miyoshi Kurahashi; Bhadra Lokuge; Adam Rapoport; Stephanie Saunders; Elaine Stasiulis; Jennifer Stinson; Saranjah Subramaniam; Pete Wegier; Melanie Barwick
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Oncology Patient Interest in the Use of New Technologies to Manage Their Disease: Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Roberto Collado-Borrell; Vicente Escudero-Vilaplana; Antonio Calles; Estela Garcia-Martin; Belen Marzal-Alfaro; Eva Gonzalez-Haba; Ana Herranz-Alonso; Maria Sanjurjo-Saez
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.428

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.