OBJECTIVE: To compare the expression of pinopodes, the marker of endometrial receptivity, during the implantation window in Kunming mice stimulated with two different doses of raloxifene (RAL). METHODS: Forty-eight 8-week-old female Kunming mice were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=12), namely saline group, clomiphene citrate (CC, 18 mg/kg) group, RAL (33 mg/kg) group and RAL (44 mg/kg group). In each group, the mice received intragastric administration of 1 mL of normal saline containing CC or RAL at the specified doses or saline only as indicated for ovulation induction, once daily for 2 days. The mice received then injection with 5 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and mated and on day 4.5 of gestation, the pregnant mice were sacrificed for examination of the uterus with scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Abundant and well developed pinopodes were observed in the endometrium of the mice in the 2 RAL groups and in the saline control group. The mice in CC group showed obviously reduced endometrial pinopodes with poor development. CONCLUSIONS: RAL at two different doses does not obviously affect the expression of pinopodes in the uterine epithelium of mice, suggesting the safety of RAL at these two doses for ovulation induction without causing adverse effects on endometrial receptivity.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the expression of pinopodes, the marker of endometrial receptivity, during the implantation window in Kunming mice stimulated with two different doses of raloxifene (RAL). METHODS: Forty-eight 8-week-old female Kunming mice were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=12), namely saline group, clomiphene citrate (CC, 18 mg/kg) group, RAL (33 mg/kg) group and RAL (44 mg/kg group). In each group, the mice received intragastric administration of 1 mL of normal saline containing CC or RAL at the specified doses or saline only as indicated for ovulation induction, once daily for 2 days. The mice received then injection with 5 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) and mated and on day 4.5 of gestation, the pregnant mice were sacrificed for examination of the uterus with scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Abundant and well developed pinopodes were observed in the endometrium of the mice in the 2 RAL groups and in the saline control group. The mice in CC group showed obviously reduced endometrial pinopodes with poor development. CONCLUSIONS: RAL at two different doses does not obviously affect the expression of pinopodes in the uterine epithelium of mice, suggesting the safety of RAL at these two doses for ovulation induction without causing adverse effects on endometrial receptivity.
Authors: Claire Quinn; Edward Ryan; E Anne Claessens; Ellen Greenblatt; Peter Hawrylyshyn; Barbara Cruickshank; Thomas Hannam; Caroline Dunk; Robert F Casper Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2007-01-16 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: N S Weiss; M N van Vliet; J Limpens; P G A Hompes; C B Lambalk; M H Mochtar; F van der Veen; B W J Mol; M van Wely Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: C Punyadeera; R Kamps; S Defrère; F Dijcks; A de Goeij; A Ederveen; G Dunselman; P Groothuis Journal: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2008-09-11 Impact factor: 4.292