Literature DB >> 29502050

[Prognostic analysis of plantar fasciitis treated by pneumatic ballistic extracorporeal shock wave versus ultrasound guided intervention].

Xiu-Lin Huo1, Ke-Tao Wang, Xiao-Ying Zhang, Yi-Tian Yang, Fu-Yang Cao, Jing Yang, Wei-Xiu Yuan, Wei-Dong Mi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the medium- and long-term effect of pneumatic ballistic extracorporeal shock wave versus ultrasound-guided hormone injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.
METHODS: The clinical data were collected from patients with plantar fasciitis admitted to PLA General Hospital pain department from September, 2015 to February, 2017. The patients were randomly divided into ultrasound-guided drug injection group and shock wave group. The therapeutic parameters including the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores in the first step pain in the morning, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle Hindfoot Scale, and thickness of the plantar fascia were monitored before and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the treatment. The recurrence rate, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction were compared between the two groups at 6 months after the treatment.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in shock wave group and 38 patients in ultrasound group. The NRS scores in the first step pain in the morning were lowered after treatment in both groups (P<0.05), and the scores were significantly lower in ultrasound group than in shock wave group at 1 week and 1 month (P<0.01), but significantly higher in ultrasound group than in shock wave group at 3 and 6 months after treatment (P<0.05). The AOFAS functional scores were increased in both groups (P<0.05) at 6 months after treatment, was significantly lower in ultrasound group than in shock wave group than group B (90.44∓13.27 vs 75.76∓21.40; P<0.05). The effective rates in shock wave group and ultrasound group were 92.31% and 76.32%, respectively (P<0.05). Recurrence was found in 1 patient (2.56%) in shock wave group and in 8 (21.05%) in ultrasound group (P<0.05). The patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in shock wave group than in ultrasound group (8.13∓2.67 vs 6.63∓3.75, P=0.048).
CONCLUSION: Pneumatic ballistic extracorporeal shock achieves better medium- and long-term outcomes than ultrasound-guided hormone injection in the treatment of plantar fasciitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29502050      PMCID: PMC6743879     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao        ISSN: 1673-4254


  15 in total

1.  Plantar Fasciitis.

Authors:  Christopher C Muth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Comparative Effectiveness of Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy and Ultrasound-Guided Local Corticosteroid Injection Treatment for Plantar Fasciitis.

Authors:  Sehriban Hocaoglu; Umit Erkan Vurdem; Mehtap Aykac Cebicci; Serap Tomruk Sutbeyaz; Zuhal Guldeste; Serap Gurek Yunsuroglu
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2017-05

3.  Dose-related effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis.

Authors:  Su-Jin Lee; Jung-Ho Kang; Ja-Young Kim; Jin-Hong Kim; Seo-Ra Yoon; Kwang-Ik Jung
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2013-06-30

Review 4.  Plantar fasciitis: what is the diagnosis and treatment?

Authors:  Rachel E Johnson; Kim Haas; Kyle Lindow; Robert Shields
Journal:  Orthop Nurs       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.913

5.  Extra Corporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Local Corticosteroid Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Plantar Fasciitis, a Single Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Fariba Eslamian; Seyed Kazem Shakouri; Fatemeh Jahanjoo; Mehrzad Hajialiloo; Faraz Notghi
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.750

6.  Genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast and ovarian, version 1.2014.

Authors:  Mary B Daly; Robert Pilarski; Jennifer E Axilbund; Saundra S Buys; Beth Crawford; Susan Friedman; Judy E Garber; Carolyn Horton; Virginia Kaklamani; Catherine Klein; Wendy Kohlmann; Allison Kurian; Jennifer Litton; Lisa Madlensky; P Kelly Marcom; Sofia D Merajver; Kenneth Offit; Tuya Pal; Boris Pasche; Gwen Reiser; Kristen Mahoney Shannon; Elizabeth Swisher; Nicoleta C Voian; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Alison Whelan; Georgia L Wiesner; Mary A Dwyer; Rashmi Kumar
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.908

7.  Risk factors affecting chronic rupture of the plantar fascia.

Authors:  Ho Seong Lee; Young Rak Choi; Sang Woo Kim; Jin Yong Lee; Jeong Ho Seo; Jae Jung Jeong
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 8.  Treatment of chronic plantar fasciopathy with extracorporeal shock waves (review).

Authors:  Christoph Schmitz; Nikolaus B M Császár; Jan-Dirk Rompe; Humberto Chaves; John P Furia
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Extracorporeal shock wave therapy is effective in treating chronic plantar fasciitis: A meta-analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  Jiale Sun; Fuqiang Gao; Yanhua Wang; Wei Sun; Baoguo Jiang; Zirong Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 10.  Plantar fasciitis.

Authors:  S Cutts; N Obi; C Pasapula; W Chan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  2 in total

1.  Artificial Intelligence Technology Combined with Ultrasound-Guided Needle Knife Interventional Treatment of PF: Improvement of Pain, Fascia Thickness, and Ankle-Foot Function in Patients.

Authors:  Silai Zhu; Yuli Niu; Jing Wang; Dan Xu; Yong Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Corticosteroid injection for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Glen A Whittaker; Shannon E Munteanu; Hylton B Menz; Daniel R Bonanno; James M Gerrard; Karl B Landorf
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.362

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.