Literature DB >> 29502009

The role of visual experience in the emergence of cross-modal correspondences.

Giles Hamilton-Fletcher1, Katarzyna Pisanski2, David Reby3, Michał Stefańczyk4, Jamie Ward5, Agnieszka Sorokowska6.   

Abstract

Cross-modal correspondences describe the widespread tendency for attributes in one sensory modality to be consistently matched to those in another modality. For example, high pitched sounds tend to be matched to spiky shapes, small sizes, and high elevations. However, the extent to which these correspondences depend on sensory experience (e.g. regularities in the perceived environment) remains controversial. Two recent studies involving blind participants have argued that visual experience is necessary for the emergence of correspondences, wherein such correspondences were present (although attenuated) in late blind individuals but absent in the early blind. Here, using a similar approach and a large sample of early and late blind participants (N = 59) and sighted controls (N = 63), we challenge this view. Examining five auditory-tactile correspondences, we show that only one requires visual experience to emerge (pitch-shape), two are independent of visual experience (pitch-size, pitch-weight), and two appear to emerge in response to blindness (pitch-texture, pitch-softness). These effects tended to be more pronounced in the early blind than late blind group, and the duration of vision loss among the late blind did not mediate the strength of these correspondences. Our results suggest that altered sensory input can affect cross-modal correspondences in a more complex manner than previously thought and cannot solely be explained by a reduction in visually-mediated environmental correlations. We propose roles of visual calibration, neuroplasticity and structurally-innate associations in accounting for our findings.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blindness; Cross-modal correspondences; Pitch; Sound; Touch

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29502009     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  7 in total

1.  A Protracted Sensitive Period Regulates the Development of Cross-Modal Sound-Shape Associations in Humans.

Authors:  Suddha Sourav; Ramesh Kekunnaya; Idris Shareef; Seema Banerjee; Davide Bottari; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-09-04

2.  Brain networks underlying the processing of sound symbolism related to softness perception.

Authors:  Ryo Kitada; Jinhwan Kwon; Ryuichi Doizaki; Eri Nakagawa; Tsubasa Tanigawa; Hiroyuki Kajimoto; Norihiro Sadato; Maki Sakamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Japanese Sound-Symbolic Words for Representing the Hardness of an Object Are Judged Similarly by Japanese and English Speakers.

Authors:  Li Shan Wong; Jinhwan Kwon; Zane Zheng; Suzy J Styles; Maki Sakamoto; Ryo Kitada
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-15

4.  Crossmodal Associations with Olfactory, Auditory, and Tactile Stimuli in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Laura J Speed; Ilja Croijmans; Sarah Dolscheid; Asifa Majid
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-12-06

5.  Audiovisual spatial recalibration but not integration is shaped by early sensory experience.

Authors:  Patrick Bruns; Lux Li; Maria J S Guerreiro; Idris Shareef; Siddhart S Rajendran; Kabilan Pitchaimuthu; Ramesh Kekunnaya; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-05-23

Review 6.  Roughness perception: A multisensory/crossmodal perspective.

Authors:  Nicola Di Stefano; Charles Spence
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Heaviness-brightness correspondence and stimulus-response compatibility.

Authors:  Peter Walker; Gabrielle Scallon; Brian J Francis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.