Literature DB >> 29501747

Assessment of health-related quality of life in spine treatment: conversion from SF-36 to VR-12.

Matthew F Gornet1, Anne G Copay2, Katrine M Sorensen2, Francine W Schranck2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Health-related quality-of-life outcomes have been collected with the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form 36 (SF-36) survey. Boston University School of Public Health has developed algorithms for the conversion of SF-36 to Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study is to investigate the conversion of the SF-36 to VR-12 PCS and MCS scores. STUDY
DESIGN: Preoperative and postoperative SF-36 were collected from patients who underwent lumbar or cervical surgery from a single surgeon between August 1998 and January 2013.
METHODS: Short Form 36 PCS and MCS scores were calculated following their original instructions. The SF-36 answers were then converted to VR-12 PCS and MCS scores following the algorithm provided by the Boston University School of Public Health. The mean score, preoperative to postoperative change, and proportions of patients who reach the minimum detectable change were compared between SF-36 and VR-12.
RESULTS: A total of 1,968 patients (1,559 lumbar and 409 cervical) had completed preoperative and postoperative SF-36. The values of the SF-36 and VR-12 mean scores were extremely similar, with score differences ranging from 0.77 to 1.82. The preoperative to postoperative improvement was highly significant (p<.001) for both SF-36 and VR-12 scores. The mean change scores were similar, with a difference of up to 0.93 for PCS and up to 0.37 for MCS. Minimum detectable change (MDC) values were almost identical for SF-36 and VR-12, with a difference of 0.12 for PCS and up to 0.41 for MCS. The proportions of patients whose change in score reached MDC were also nearly identical for SF-36 and VR-12. About 90% of the patients above SF-36 MDC were also above VR-12 MDC.
CONCLUSIONS: The converted VR-12 scores, similar to the SF-36 scores, detect a significant postoperative improvement in PCS and MCS scores. The calculated MDC values and the proportions of patients whose score improvement reach MDC are similar for both SF-36 and VR-12.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health assessment; Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36); Minimum clinically important difference; Minimum detectable change; Patient-reported outcomes; Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12)

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29501747     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  10 in total

1.  Validation of Veterans RAND 12-Item Physical Function Survey in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Michael T Nolte; James M Parrish; Nathaniel W Jenkins; Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Caroline N Jadczak; Shruthi Mohan; Cara E Geoghegan; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Average and individual differences between the 12-item MOS Short-form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 V.2) and the veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12) in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Daniel Y T Fong; Bobo K Y Chan; Sha Li; C H Wan; Lewis E Kazis
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Quantitative preoperative patient assessments are related to survival and procedure outcome for osseous metastases.

Authors:  Meredith K Bartelstein; Jonathan A Forsberg; Jessica A Lavery; Mohamed A Yakoub; Samuel Akhnoukh; Patrick J Boland; Nicola Fabbri; John H Healey
Journal:  J Bone Oncol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.491

4.  Validating the VR-12 Physical Function Instrument After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with SF-12, PROMIS, and NDI.

Authors:  Nathaniel W Jenkins; James M Parrish; Michael T Nolte; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-11-09

5.  Use of Computerized Adaptive Testing to Develop More Concise Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Liam T Kane; Surena Namdari; Otho R Plummer; Pedro Beredjiklian; Alexander Vaccaro; Joseph A Abboud
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-03-12

6.  Translation and adaptation of the German version of the Veterans Rand-36/12 Item Health Survey.

Authors:  Ines Buchholz; You-Shan Feng; Maresa Buchholz; Lewis E Kazis; Thomas Kohlmann
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Health Conditions, Substance Use, Physical Activity, and Quality of Life in Current and Former Baseball Players.

Authors:  Garrett S Bullock; Kristen F Nicholson; Brian R Waterman; Eric Niesen; Paul Salamh; Charles A Thigpen; Ellen Shanley; Laurie Devaney; Gary S Collins; Nigel K Arden; Stephanie R Filbay
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-23

8.  Improvements in Mental Well-Being and its Predictive Factors in Patients who Underwent Cervical versus Lumbar Decompression Surgery.

Authors:  Koji Tamai; Akinobu Suzuki; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Hidetomi Terai; Masatoshi Hoshino; Shinji Takahashi; Yusuke Hori; Akito Yabu; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Spine Surg Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-11

9.  Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Is a Valid Assessment for Depression in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Discectomy.

Authors:  Conor P Lynch; Elliot D K Cha; Nathaniel W Jenkins; James M Parrish; Cara E Geoghegan; Caroline N Jadczak; Shruthi Mohan; Kern Singh
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2021-06-30

10.  Prospective, Single-Center Comparison of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Plus Electroacupuncture and Standard Analgesia in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Effect on Rehabilitation and Functional Recovery.

Authors:  Xuejing Li; Wei Yu; Hongbo Li; Baoyue Wang; Jiang Xu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-06-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.