Literature DB >> 29501646

Lung Cancer Screening in the Community Setting.

Stephen M Cattaneo1, Barry R Meisenberg2, Maria C M Geronimo3, Bishal Bhandari3, John W Maxted3, Catherine J Brady-Copertino2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer has high incidence and high mortality burden, particularly because it is typically diagnosed in later stages. The National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated a lung cancer-specific mortality benefit in high-risk current and former smokers with yearly low-dose chest computed tomography (CT). Lung cancer screening is thus recommended, but it is unclear whether the results of the National Lung Screening Trial can be replicated in community settings.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of the lung screening program over its first 5 years, 2012 to 2016. Patients' demographics, initial screening results, follow-up, and management results were analyzed in relation to the National Lung Screening Trial results. Annual adherence was defined as returning for imaging within 1 year + 90 days.
RESULTS: A total of 1,241 persons underwent initial screening over the 5-year period; 78.6% of findings were benign, and only annual repeat low-dose chest CT was recommended. A total of 29 cancers were identified in 26 participants (2%), of which 72% were stage I. The annual adherence rate to repeat imaging after a low-risk baseline scan was 37%, and the any follow-up rate was 51% despite programmatic efforts to follow screening recommendations. When positive findings required more intensive evaluation, most commonly by repeat chest CT scan, adherence was 88%. A total of 1.1% of all participants had invasive biopsies for benign results. Complications of biopsy were minimal.
CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that a community-based program can approximate the results of the National Lung Screening Trial in detecting early lung cancers. Further study of the adherence phenomenon is essential.
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29501646     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  16 in total

1.  Racial Disparities in Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening and Recommended Follow-Up Care: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Authors:  Roger Y Kim; Katharine A Rendle; Nandita Mitra; Chelsea A Saia; Christine Neslund-Dudas; Robert T Greenlee; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Stacey A Honda; Michael J Simoff; Marilyn M Schapira; Jennifer M Croswell; Rafael Meza; Debra P Ritzwoller; Anil Vachani
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2022-09

2.  Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening: What Exactly Are We Talking About?

Authors:  Lori C Sakoda; Louise M Henderson; M Patricia Rivera
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-12

3.  Racial and socioeconomic disparities in lung cancer screening in the United States: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ernesto Sosa; Gail D'Souza; Aamna Akhtar; Melissa Sur; Kyra Love; Jeanette Duffels; Dan J Raz; Jae Y Kim; Virginia Sun; Loretta Erhunmwunsee
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 286.130

4.  "It's Really Like Any Other Study": Rural Radiology Facilities Performing Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Christopher G Slatore; Sara E Golden; Tara Thomas; Sarah Bumatay; Jackilen Shannon; Melinda Davis
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2021-12

5.  Utility of incorporating a gene-based lung cancer risk test on uptake and adherence in a community-based lung cancer screening pilot study.

Authors:  V K Lam; R J Scott; P Billings; E Cabebe; R P Young
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-05-16

6.  Lung Cancer Strategist Program: A novel care delivery model to improve timeliness of diagnosis and treatment in high-risk patients.

Authors:  William W Phillips; Jessica Copeland; Sophie C Hofferberth; Julee R Armitage; Sam Fox; Margaret Kruithoff; Claire de Forcrand; Paul J Catalano; Christopher S Lathan; Joel S Weissman; David D Odell; Yolonda L Colson
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2021-06-26

7.  Determinants Associated With Longitudinal Adherence to Annual Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Analysis of Claims Data.

Authors:  Erin A Hirsch; Anna E Barón; Betsy Risendal; Jamie L Studts; Melissa L New; Stephen P Malkoski
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 6.240

8.  Prevalence and burden of bronchiectasis in a lung cancer screening program.

Authors:  Maria Sanchez-Carpintero Abad; Pablo Sanchez-Salcedo; Juan P de-Torres; Ana B Alcaide; Luis M Seijo; Jesus Pueyo; Gorka Bastarrika; Javier J Zulueta; Arantza Campo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Patient Adherence to Screening for Lung Cancer in the US: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Kristin G Maki; Noah J Choi; Richard M Hoffman; Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Lisa M Lowenstein; Rachel S Hicklen; Robert J Volk
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-11-02

10.  Adherence to Follow-up Testing Recommendations in US Veterans Screened for Lung Cancer, 2015-2019.

Authors:  Eduardo R Núñez; Tanner J Caverly; Sanqian Zhang; Mark E Glickman; Shirley X Qian; Jacqueline H Boudreau; Christopher G Slatore; Donald R Miller; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.