Literature DB >> 29501630

Workshop on acceleration of the validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative methods and implementation of testing strategies.

A H Piersma1, T Burgdorf2, K Louekari3, B Desprez4, R Taalman4, R Landsiedel5, J Barroso6, V Rogiers7, C Eskes8, M Oelgeschläger2, M Whelan6, A Braeuning9, A M Vinggaard10, A Kienhuis11, J van Benthem11, J Ezendam11.   

Abstract

This report describes the proceedings of the BfR-RIVM workshop on validation of alternative methods which was held 23 and 24 March 2017 in Berlin, Germany. Stakeholders from governmental agencies, regulatory authorities, universities, industry and the OECD were invited to discuss current problems concerning the regulatory acceptance and implementation of alternative test methods and testing strategies, with the aim to develop feasible solutions. Classical validation of alternative methods usually involves one to one comparison with the gold standard animal study. This approach suffers from the reductionist nature of an alternative test as compared to the animal study as well as from the animal study being considered as the gold standard. Modern approaches combine individual alternatives into testing strategies, for which integrated and defined approaches are emerging at OECD. Furthermore, progress in mechanistic toxicology, e.g. through the adverse outcome pathway approach, and in computational systems toxicology allows integration of alternative test battery results into toxicity predictions that are more fine-tuned to the human situation. The road towards transition to a mechanistically-based human-focused hazard and risk assessment of chemicals requires an open mind towards stepping away from the animal study as the gold standard and defining human biologically based regulatory requirements for human hazard and risk assessment.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29501630     DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2018.02.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro        ISSN: 0887-2333            Impact factor:   3.500


  5 in total

1.  Pluripotent stem cell assays: Modalities and applications for predictive developmental toxicity.

Authors:  Aldert H Piersma; Nancy C Baker; George P Daston; Burkhard Flick; Michio Fujiwara; Thomas B Knudsen; Horst Spielmann; Noriyuki Suzuki; Katya Tsaioun; Hajime Kojima
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Adaptation of the Systematic Review Framework to the Assessment of Toxicological Test Methods: Challenges and Lessons Learned with the Zebrafish Embryotoxicity Test.

Authors:  Martin L Stephens; Sevcan Gül Akgün-Ölmez; Sebastian Hoffmann; Rob de Vries; Burkhard Flick; Thomas Hartung; Manoj Lalu; Alexandra Maertens; Hilda Witters; Robert Wright; Katya Tsaioun
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  The use of Bayesian methodology in the development and validation of a tiered assessment approach towards prediction of rat acute oral toxicity.

Authors:  James W Firman; Mark T D Cronin; Philip H Rowe; Elizaveta Semenova; John E Doe
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Correlation Analysis of Variables From the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Meisha Mandal; Josh Levy; Cataia Ives; Stephen Hwang; Yi-Hui Zhou; Alison Motsinger-Reif; Huaqin Pan; Wayne Huggins; Carol Hamilton; Fred Wright; Stephen Edwards
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 5.988

Review 5.  A framework for establishing scientific confidence in new approach methodologies.

Authors:  Anna J van der Zalm; João Barroso; Patience Browne; Warren Casey; John Gordon; Tala R Henry; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Anna B Lowit; Monique Perron; Amy J Clippinger
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 6.168

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.