Literature DB >> 29501474

Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening - A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark.

Elise Harder1, Kirsten E Juul1, Signe M Jensen2, Louise T Thomsen1, Kirsten Frederiksen2, Susanne K Kjaer3.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer occurs most often in under-screened women. In this nationwide register study, we described differences in sociodemographic characteristics between passive and active non-participants and examined socio-demographic characteristics, reproductive history, and mental and physical health as potential determinants for passive non-participation compared with participation in the Danish cervical cancer screening program. Screening history in women aged 23-49 years invited for cervical cancer screening in 2008-2009 was retrieved from the Danish Pathology Databank with information about dates of invitation and unsubscription. We identified participants (n = 402,984), active non-participants (n = 10,251) and passive non-participants (n = 63,435) within four years following baseline invitation and retrieved data about the study population from high-quality registries. We examined differences in socio-demographic characteristics of passive and active non-participants, and used multiple logistic regression analyses to identify potential determinants of passive non-participation. We found that active and passive non-participants differed in relation to socio-demography. When compared with screening participants, the odds of passive non-participation was increased in women who originated from less developed countries; were unmarried; had basic education or low income; had four or more children; smoked during pregnancy; had multiple induced abortions; or had a history of obesity, intoxicant abuse or schizophrenia or other psychoses. In conclusion, in this nationwide, prospective, population-based study, differences in socio-demographic characteristics between passive and active non-participants were found. Furthermore, sociodemography, reproductive history, and mental and physical health were determinants for passive non-participation. Addressing inequalities in screening attendance may help to further decrease the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer screening; Determinants; Mental health; Non-participation; Physical health; Reproductive history; Socio-demographics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29501474     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  9 in total

1.  Perception and knowledge of HPV-related and vaccine-related conditions among a large cohort of university students in Italy.

Authors:  T Baldovin; C Bertoncello; S Cocchio; M Fonzo; D Gazzani; A Buja; S Majori; V Baldo
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Non-Adherence To Childhood HPV Vaccination Is Associated With Non-Participation In Cervical Cancer Screening - A Nationwide Danish Register-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sara Badre-Esfahani; Mette Bach Larsen; Lene Seibæk; Lone Kjeld Petersen; Jan Blaakær; Henrik Støvring; Berit Andersen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Low attendance by non-native women to human papillomavirus vaccination and cervical cancer screening - A Danish nationwide register-based cohort study.

Authors:  S Badre-Esfahani; M B Larsen; L Seibæk; L K Petersen; J Blaakær; B Andersen
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2020-04-28

4.  IPVS policy statement. Equity in cervical cancer prevention: for all and not just for some.

Authors:  Julia Brotherton; Cristyn Davies
Journal:  Papillomavirus Res       Date:  2019-12-04

5.  Investigating the decrease in participation in the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: The role of personal and organisational characteristics.

Authors:  Clare A Aitken; Sylvia Kaljouw; Albert G Siebers; Matilde Bron; Anne Morssink; Folkert J van Kemenade; Inge M C M de Kok
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-02-20

6.  A population survey on beliefs around cervical cancer screening: determining the barriers and facilitators associated with attendance.

Authors:  Gaby Judah; Faisal Dilib; Ara Darzi; Sarah Huf
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 7.  Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Federica Vallone; Daniela Lemmo; Maria Luisa Martino; Anna Rosa Donizzetti; Maria Francesca Freda; Francesco Palumbo; Elvira Lorenzo; Angelo D'Argenzio; Daniela Caso
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.955

8.  Strong association between cervical and breast cancer screening behaviour among Danish women; A register-based cohort study.

Authors:  S H Larsen; L F Virgilsen; B K Kristiansen; B Andersen; P Vedsted
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-10-27

9.  Cervical cancer screening history prior to a diagnosis of cervical cancer in Danish women aged 60 years and older-A national cohort study.

Authors:  Anne Hammer; Vibeke Soegaard; Rikke D Maimburg; Jan Blaakaer
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.452

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.