Philip Crilly1, Wasim Hassanali2, Gary Khanna3, Kiranjit Matharu4, Deep Patel5, Disha Patel6, Fahmida Rahman7, Reem Kayyali8. 1. School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, KT1 2EE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: P.Crilly@kingston.ac.uk. 2. School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, KT1 2EE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: wasim134@hotmail.com. 3. School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, KT1 2EE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: gary_khanna@hotmail.co.uk. 4. School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, KT1 2EE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kkm1992@hotmail.co.uk. 5. School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, KT1 2EE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: deep1402@hotmail.co.uk. 6. School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, KT1 2EE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Disha.patel1993@hotmail.com. 7. School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, KT1 2EE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: fahmida.r@hotmail.co.uk. 8. School of Life Sciences, Pharmacy and Chemistry, Kingston University, KT1 2EE, United Kingdom. Electronic address: R.Kayyali@kingston.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A number of barriers prevent community pharmacists (CPs) from impacting public health (PH) outcomes. Social media (SM) and mobile health apps (MH apps) may offer ways to help the public make positive health decisions. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate CP perceptions of their role in PH and the use of SM and MH apps in this regard. METHODS: This was a mixed method study using a cross-sectional survey and follow-up interviews. The survey covered: CPs role in PH; CP use of SM; CP use of MH apps; non-identifiable demographic information. Following ethical approval and piloting, responses were collected on paper and online. The study population was CPs in Greater London, UK (n = 2931). A minimum sample size of 340 was calculated (95% confidence interval/5% margin of error). To achieve this, 596 surveys were distributed. Responses (n = 257) were analysed using descriptive statistics. Twenty-five respondents were willing to take part in follow-up one-to-one interviews. Twenty interviews were completed as data saturation was achieved after the 14th. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using framework methodology as described by Ritchie and Spencer in 1994. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 43%. Respondents represented English CPs in terms of age but males and non-whites were over-represented. The majority of CPs accessed SM and MH apps for personal use but did not recommend these in a professional capacity due to lack of awareness and confidentiality/liability concerns. Most would promote an SM health page (78.6%) or MH app (83.7%) if maintained by healthcare professionals (HCPs). Under 35s were more positive about these tools in PH. Two interview themes emerged: The role of CPs in PH; Concerns and opportunities for the use of technology in PH. CONCLUSIONS: Most CPs, particularly those under 30, were positive about the use of SM and MH apps in PH. Training on the use of such tools among the pharmacy team, and an awareness of the availability of evidence-based apps will ensure their wider adoption.
BACKGROUND: A number of barriers prevent community pharmacists (CPs) from impacting public health (PH) outcomes. Social media (SM) and mobile health apps (MH apps) may offer ways to help the public make positive health decisions. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate CP perceptions of their role in PH and the use of SM and MH apps in this regard. METHODS: This was a mixed method study using a cross-sectional survey and follow-up interviews. The survey covered: CPs role in PH; CP use of SM; CP use of MH apps; non-identifiable demographic information. Following ethical approval and piloting, responses were collected on paper and online. The study population was CPs in Greater London, UK (n = 2931). A minimum sample size of 340 was calculated (95% confidence interval/5% margin of error). To achieve this, 596 surveys were distributed. Responses (n = 257) were analysed using descriptive statistics. Twenty-five respondents were willing to take part in follow-up one-to-one interviews. Twenty interviews were completed as data saturation was achieved after the 14th. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using framework methodology as described by Ritchie and Spencer in 1994. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 43%. Respondents represented English CPs in terms of age but males and non-whites were over-represented. The majority of CPs accessed SM and MH apps for personal use but did not recommend these in a professional capacity due to lack of awareness and confidentiality/liability concerns. Most would promote an SM health page (78.6%) or MH app (83.7%) if maintained by healthcare professionals (HCPs). Under 35s were more positive about these tools in PH. Two interview themes emerged: The role of CPs in PH; Concerns and opportunities for the use of technology in PH. CONCLUSIONS: Most CPs, particularly those under 30, were positive about the use of SM and MH apps in PH. Training on the use of such tools among the pharmacy team, and an awareness of the availability of evidence-based apps will ensure their wider adoption.