Literature DB >> 29500760

Use the force: deformation correction in robotic 3D ultrasound.

Salvatore Virga1, Rüdiger Göbl2, Maximilian Baust2, Nassir Navab2,3, Christoph Hennersperger2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ultrasound acquisitions are typically affected by deformations due to the pressure applied onto the contact surface. While a certain amount of pressure is necessary to ensure good acoustic coupling and visibility of the anatomy under examination, the caused deformations hinder accurate localization and geometric analysis of anatomical structures. These complications have even greater impact in case of 3D ultrasound scans as they limit the correct reconstruction of acquired volumes.
METHODS: In this work, we propose a method to estimate and correct the induced deformation based solely on the tracked ultrasound images and information about the applied force. This is achieved by modeling estimated displacement fields of individual image sequences using the measured force information. By representing the computed displacement fields using a graph-based approach, we are able to recover a deformation-less 3D volume.
RESULTS: Validation is performed on 30 in vivo human datasets acquired using a robotic ultrasound framework. Compared to ground truth, the presented deformation correction shows errors of [Formula: see text] for an applied force of 5 N at a penetration depth of 55 mm.
CONCLUSION: The proposed technique allows for the correction of deformations induced by the transducer pressure in entire 3D ultrasound volumes. Our technique does not require biomechanical models, patient-specific assumptions or information about the tissue properties; it can be employed based on the information from readily available robotic ultrasound platforms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compounding; Deformation correction; Inpainting; Robotic ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500760     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-018-1716-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  14 in total

1.  Correction of probe pressure artifacts in freehand 3D ultrasound.

Authors:  G M Treece; R W Prager; A H Gee; L Berman
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Soft tissue sarcomas: ultrasonographic evaluation of local recurrences.

Authors:  S Arya; D G Nagarkatti; S B Dudhat; K S Nadkarni; M S Joshi; S R Shinde
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

Authors:  Blake A Morrison
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-07

4.  Diffeomorphic demons: efficient non-parametric image registration.

Authors:  Tom Vercauteren; Xavier Pennec; Aymeric Perchant; Nicholas Ayache
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; I Céspedes; H Ponnekanti; Y Yazdi; X Li
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  Toward a generic real-time compression correction framework for tracked ultrasound.

Authors:  Thomas S Pheiffer; Michael I Miga
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  A quadratic energy minimization framework for signal loss estimation from arbitrarily sampled ultrasound data.

Authors:  Christoph Hennersperger; Diana Mateus; Maximilian Baust; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014

8.  Towards MRI-Based Autonomous Robotic US Acquisitions: A First Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Christoph Hennersperger; Bernhard Fuerst; Salvatore Virga; Oliver Zettinig; Benjamin Frisch; Thomas Neff; Nassir Navab
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Standardized 2D ultrasound versus 3D/4D ultrasound and image fusion for measurement of aortic aneurysm diameter in follow-up after EVAR.

Authors:  Karin Pfister; Wilma Schierling; Ernst Michael Jung; Hanna Apfelbeck; Christoph Hennersperger; Piotr M Kasprzak
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system.

Authors:  Shyam Natarajan; Leonard S Marks; Daniel J A Margolis; Jiaoti Huang; Maria Luz Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Aaron Fenster
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

View more
  3 in total

1.  Ultrasound simulation with deformable and patient-specific scatterer maps.

Authors:  Rastislav Starkov; Lin Zhang; Michael Bajka; Christine Tanner; Orcun Goksel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Intelligent magnetic manipulation for gastrointestinal ultrasound.

Authors:  Joseph C Norton; Piotr R Slawinski; Holly S Lay; James W Martin; Benjamin F Cox; Gerard Cummins; Marc P Y Desmulliez; Richard E Clutton; Keith L Obstein; Sandy Cochran; Pietro Valdastri
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2019-06-19

3.  Good and bad boundaries in ultrasound compounding: preserving anatomic boundaries while suppressing artifacts.

Authors:  Alex Ling Yu Hung; John Galeotti
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 2.924

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.