Literature DB >> 29500572

Rectal E. coli above ciprofloxacin ECOFF associate with infectious complications following prostate biopsy.

Inari Kalalahti1, Kaisa Huotari2, Kanerva Lahdensuo3, Eveliina Tarkka4, Henrikki Santti3, Antti Rannikko3, Anu Pätäri-Sampo4.   

Abstract

Transrectal prostate biopsies carry the risk of infection. By using non-selective culture plates, instead of commonly used ciprofloxacin (CIP)-containing plates, we analyzed the association between Escherichia coli CIP minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and post-biopsy infectious complications. A pre-biopsy rectal swab was taken from 207 consecutive men, scheduled for transrectal 12-core prostate biopsy with CIP 750 mg as the mostly used prophylaxis. CIP MIC of rectal Gram-negative bacilli was determined from a chromogenic agar. Rectal E. coli were categorized to resistant (R) and intermediate (I) isolates together (R + I, MIC > 0.25 mg/l) and to sensitive (S, MIC ≤ 0.25 mg/l) using EUCAST clinical breakpoints. In addition, epidemiological cutoff (ECOFF R, MIC > 0.064 mg/l) was used for categorization. Eighteen (8.7%) men showed CIP R + I E. coli by the EUCAST breakpoints and 41 (19.8%) using the ECOFF R criteria. During follow-up, 15 (7.2%) men had infectious symptoms, of which 9 (4.3%) were culture-confirmed infections. Only 4 (26.7%) of these 15 patients showed R + I E. coli in the rectal swab according to EUCAST, but 10 (66.7%) using the ECOFF cutoff. Rectal E. coli CIP R + I by the EUCAST clinical breakpoints associated with infectious complications with OR 5.7 (95% CI 1.5-21.8, P = 0.005) and ECOFF R E. coli by OR 10.7 (95% CI 3.0-37.6, P < 0.001). Men carrying rectal E. coli with moderately lowered CIP susceptibility (MIC > ECOFF 0.064 mg/l) were identified and, interestingly, they showed a high risk of developing infectious symptoms after the biopsy. This explains why some men develop infectious complications despite appropriate antibiotics before prostatic biopsies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02140502.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic prophylaxis; Complication; Infection; Prostate biopsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500572     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-018-3217-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  26 in total

Review 1.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in core prostate biopsy: Impact of timing and identification of risk factors.

Authors:  Sandra Lindstedt; Ulla Lindström; Eva Ljunggren; Björn Wullt; Magnus Grabe
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  An Update of the American Urological Association White Paper on the Prevention and Treatment of the More Common Complications Related to Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Behfar Ehdaie; Stacy Loeb; Maxwell V Meng; Jay D Raman; Vanessa Spears; Sean P Stroup
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms from rectal swabs by use of selective media prior to a transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; Amy N Peeples; Ellena M Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Outcomes of fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase after transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate.

Authors:  Elif Tukenmez Tigen; Zafer Tandogdu; Onder Ergonul; Gulsen Altinkanat; Bilal Gunaydin; Mahir Ozgen; Nevin Sariguzel; Buket Erturk Sengel; Zekaver Odabasi; Mete Cek; Resit Tokuc; Levent Turkeri; Lutfiye Mulazimoglu; Volkan Korten
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Clinical and microbiological determinants of infection after transrectal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Michael A Liss; James R Johnson; Stephen B Porter; Brian Johnston; Connie Clabots; Kyle Gillis; Unwanaobong Nseyo; Marc Holden; Kyoko Sakamoto; Joshua Fierer
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Comparative Effectiveness of Single versus Combination Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Infections after Transrectal Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Kaylee Marino; Anne Parlee; Ralph Orlando; Lori Lerner; Judith Strymish; Kalpana Gupta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Rectal Culture-Guided Targeted Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Reduces the Incidence of Post-Operative Infectious Complications in Men at High Risk for Infections Submitted to Transrectal Ultrasound Prostate Biopsy - Results of a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Luca Boeri; Matteo Fontana; Andrea Gallioli; Stefano Paolo Zanetti; Michele Catellani; Fabrizio Longo; Barbara Mangiarotti; Emanuele Montanari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of preoperative screening for rectal colonization with fluoroquinolone-resistant enteric bacteria on the incidence of sepsis following transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  John J Farrell; Jennifer L Hicks; Stephanie E Wallace; Allen D Seftel
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2017-02-24

10.  Optimizing prophylactic antibiotic regimen in patients admitted for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ahmed Fahmy; Hazem Rhashad; Mohamed Mohi; Ahmed Elabbadie; Ahmed Kotb
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2016-07-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Does Protocol Make a Difference? Comparison of Two Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Cohorts: A Non-protocol-based Follow-up and a Protocol-based Contemporary Follow-up.

Authors:  Inari Kalalahti; Hanna Vasarainen; Andrew M Erickson; Arttu Siipola; Kari A O Tikkinen; Antti Rannikko
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-10-28

2.  Infectious complications after transrectal MRI-targeted and systematic prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Inari Kalalahti; Kaisa Huotari; Andrew M Erickson; Anssi Petas; Hanna Vasarainen; Antti Rannikko
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 3.661

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.