| Literature DB >> 29500365 |
Zsófia Molnár1, Viktória Bódai1, George Szakacs1, Balázs Erdélyi1, Zsolt Fogarassy2, György Sáfrán2, Tamás Varga3, Zoltán Kónya3,4, Eszter Tóth-Szeles5, Rózsa Szűcs5,6, István Lagzi7,8.
Abstract
Alternative methods, including green synthetic approaches for the preparation of various types of nanoparticles are important to maintain sustainable development. Extracellular or intracellular extracts of fungi are perfect candidates for the synthesis of metal nanoparticles due to the scalability and cost efficiency of fungal growth even on industrial scale. There are several methods and techniques that use fungi-originated fractions for synthesis of gold nanoparticles. However, there is less knowledge about the drawbacks and limitations of these techniques. Additionally, identification of components that play key roles in the synthesis is challenging. Here we show and compare the results of three different approaches for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles using either the extracellular fraction, the autolysate of the fungi or the intracellular fraction of 29 thermophilic fungi. We observed the formation of nanoparticles with different sizes (ranging between 6 nm and 40 nm) and size distributions (with standard deviations ranging between 30% and 70%) depending on the fungi strain and experimental conditions. We found by using ultracentrifugal filtration technique that the size of reducing agents is less than 3 kDa and the size of molecules that can efficiently stabilize nanoparticles is greater than 3 kDa.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29500365 PMCID: PMC5834445 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22112-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The sketch of the preparation of different extracts from fungi and synthesis of AuNPs by different methods using (i) extracellular extract, (ii) autolysate and (iii) intracellular extract.
Figure 2Effect of different growth media on the synthesis of AuNPs (control experiments). PDB medium reduces gold salt and provide AuNPs with an average size of 17.3 nm with standard deviation of 11.5 nm (top panel- size distribution of produced NPs with TEM micrograph and a cuvette containing the solution of AuNPs). Modified Czapek-Dox medium produces no NPs, but microscopic gold precipitate (middle panel- SEM micrographs and a cuvette), which sediments from the solution. An antibiotic mixture of ampicillin and kanamycin can produce highly polydisperse AuNPs (bottom panel - size distribution of produced NPs with TEM micrograph and a cuvette containing the solution of AuNPs).
Figure 3Characterization of BioAuNPs synthetized by thermophilic fungi grown on PDB medium: E: extracellular fraction; A: autolysate fraction, I: intracellular fraction. Numbers in the brackets correspond to the elapsed time in hours after the colour (shown in the last column) of the sample did not change further.
Figure 4Synthesis of AuNPs using extracellular extract of various fungi (Rhizomucor pusillus ATCC® 42782™, Sporotrichum thermophile ATCC® 36347™, Thermoascus thermophilus ATCC® 26413™ and Thermomyces lanuginosus ATCC® 46882™). Each graph shows the size distribution of produced BioAuNPs with TEM micrograph (inset), the average size with standard deviation of the particles and the wavelength of maximum absorbance and a photo of a cuvette containing solution of AuNPs. The scale bar represents 200 nm.
Figure 6Synthesis of AuNPs using the intracellular extract of various fungi (Rhizomucor pusillus ATCC® 42782™, Sporotrichum thermophile ATCC® 36347™, Thermoascus thermophilus ATCC® 26413™ and Thermomyces lanuginosus ATCC® 46882™). Each graph shows the size distribution of produced BioAuNPs with TEM micrograph (inset), the average size with standard deviation of the particles, the wavelength of maximum absorbance and a photo of a cuvette containing solution of AuNPs. The scale bar represents 200 nm.
Figure 7Separation of the biomolecules by molecular weight in the extracellular fluid of Thermoascus thermophilus ATCC® 26413™ cultured on a modified Czapek-Dox medium by using molecular sieves and the effect of fractions on the formation of AuNPs (colour, morphology, the average size with standard deviation and size distribution of the particles). The scale bar represents 200 nm.