Joshua Jeong1, Helen O Pitchik2, Aisha K Yousafzai3. 1. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; and jjeong@mail.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Berkeley School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California. 3. Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Early childhood stimulation interventions positively impact early child development (ECD) outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. However, trials have less comprehensively evaluated the effects of such parenting programs on caregivers' skills and capacities. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of stimulation interventions on improving parenting outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic bibliographic databases. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials of stimulation interventions designed to improve ECD outcomes during the first 2 years of life that measured any maternal or parenting-related outcome after the start of the intervention. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted data by using a structured form. RESULTS: Fifteen studies representing 13 unique randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) based on random-effects models revealed medium-to-large benefits of stimulation interventions for improving the home caregiving environment (n = 10; SMD = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.77), mother-child interactions (n = 3; SMD = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.74), and maternal knowledge of ECD (n = 6; SMD = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.31). No significant difference was seen for maternal depressive symptoms (n = 9; SMD = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.03). LIMITATIONS: Limitations include heterogeneity across interventions, lack of standardized measures, and different time points of assessments across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Early childhood stimulation interventions improve several distinct aspects of maternal parenting. Improvements in parenting capacities may serve as key mechanisms by which these programs benefit ECD outcomes.
CONTEXT: Early childhood stimulation interventions positively impact early child development (ECD) outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. However, trials have less comprehensively evaluated the effects of such parenting programs on caregivers' skills and capacities. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of stimulation interventions on improving parenting outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Six electronic bibliographic databases. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria included randomized controlled trials of stimulation interventions designed to improve ECD outcomes during the first 2 years of life that measured any maternal or parenting-related outcome after the start of the intervention. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted data by using a structured form. RESULTS: Fifteen studies representing 13 unique randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. Pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) based on random-effects models revealed medium-to-large benefits of stimulation interventions for improving the home caregiving environment (n = 10; SMD = 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.77), mother-child interactions (n = 3; SMD = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.74), and maternal knowledge of ECD (n = 6; SMD = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.31). No significant difference was seen for maternal depressive symptoms (n = 9; SMD = -0.10; 95% CI, -0.23 to -0.03). LIMITATIONS: Limitations include heterogeneity across interventions, lack of standardized measures, and different time points of assessments across studies. CONCLUSIONS: Early childhood stimulation interventions improve several distinct aspects of maternal parenting. Improvements in parenting capacities may serve as key mechanisms by which these programs benefit ECD outcomes.
Authors: Margaret E Kruk; Todd P Lewis; Catherine Arsenault; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Grace Irimu; Joshua Jeong; Zohra S Lassi; Susan M Sawyer; Tyler Vaivada; Peter Waiswa; Aisha K Yousafzai Journal: Lancet Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: Joy Noel Baumgartner; Mohammed Ali; John A Gallis; Margaret Lillie; Raymond Owusu; Safiyatu Abubakr-Bibilazu; Haliq Adam; Raymond Aborigo; Elena McEwan; Yunji Zhou; Eunsoo Timothy Kim; Jessica Mackness; John Koku Awoonor Williams; John Hembling Journal: Glob Ment Health (Camb) Date: 2021-05-26
Authors: Melissa J Gladstone; Jaya Chandna; Gwendoline Kandawasvika; Robert Ntozini; Florence D Majo; Naume V Tavengwa; Mduduzi N N Mbuya; Goldberg T Mangwadu; Ancikaria Chigumira; Cynthia M Chasokela; Lawrence H Moulton; Rebecca J Stoltzfus; Jean H Humphrey; Andrew J Prendergast Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-03-21 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Muhammad I Husain; Imran B Chaudhry; Ameer B Khoso; Ming W Wan; Tayyeba Kiran; Tinevimbo Shiri; Nasim Chaudhry; Nasir Mehmood; Syed F Jafri; Farooq Naeem; Nusrat Husain Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2021-01-06
Authors: Esther O Chung; Ashley Hagaman; Katherine LeMasters; Nafeesa Andrabi; Victoria Baranov; Lisa M Bates; John A Gallis; Karen O'Donnell; Atif Rahman; Siham Sikander; Elizabeth L Turner; Joanna Maselko Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2020-08