Literature DB >> 29500239

Risk of 12-month mortality among hospital inpatients using the surprise question and SPICT criteria: a prospective study.

Alison M Mudge1,2, Carol Douglas3, Xanthe Sansome4, Michael Tresillian1, Stephen Murray1, Simon Finnigan4,5, Cheryl Ruth Blaber3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: People with serious life-limiting disease benefit from advance care planning, but require active identification. This study applied the Gold Standards Framework Proactive Identification Guidance (GSF-PIG) to a general hospital population to describe high-risk patients and explore prognostic performance for 12-month mortality.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study conducted in a metropolitan teaching hospital in Australia. Hospital inpatients on a single day aged 18 years and older were eligible, excluding maternity and neonatal, mental health and day treatment patients. Data sources included medical record and structured questions for medical and nursing staff. High-risk was predefined as positive response to the surprise question (SQ) plus two or more SPICT indicators of general deterioration. Descriptive variables included demographics, frailty and functional measures, treating team, advance care planning documentation and hospital utilisation. Primary outcome for prognostic performance was 12-month mortality.
RESULTS: We identified 540 eligible inpatients on the study day and 513 had complete data (mean age 60, 54% male, 30% living alone, 19% elective admissions). Of these, 191 (37%) were high-risk; they were older, frailer, more dependent and had been in hospital longer than low-risk participants. Within 12 months, 92 participants (18%) died (72/191(38%) high-risk versus 20/322(6%) low-risk, P<0.001), providing sensitivity 78%, specificity 72%, positive predictive value 38% and negative predictive value 94%. SQ alone provided higher sensitivity, adding advanced disease indicators improved specificity.
CONCLUSIONS: The GSF-PIG approach identified a large minority of hospital inpatients who might benefit from advance care planning. Future studies are needed to investigate the feasibility, cost and impact of screening in hospitals. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advance care planning; death; decision support techniques; hospitals; prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29500239     DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2017-001441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 2045-435X            Impact factor:   3.568


  5 in total

1.  The Surprise Question as a Trigger for Primary Palliative Care Interventions for Children with Advanced Heart Disease.

Authors:  Faraz Alizadeh; Emily Morell; Kevin Hummel; Yunhong Wu; David Wypij; Danes Matthew; Paul Esteso; Katie Moynihan; Elizabeth D Blume
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 1.838

2.  Increasing advance care planning in the secondary care setting: A quality improvement project.

Authors:  Anna Steel; Deborah Bertfield
Journal:  Future Healthc J       Date:  2020-06

3.  A stepped-wedge randomised-controlled trial assessing the implementation, impact and costs of a prospective feedback loop to promote appropriate care and treatment for older patients in acute hospitals at the end of life: study protocol.

Authors:  Xing J Lee; Alison Farrington; Hannah Carter; Carla Shield; Nicholas Graves; Steven M McPhail; Gillian Harvey; Ben P White; Lindy Willmott; Magnolia Cardona; Ken Hillman; Leonie Callaway; Adrian G Barnett
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Can usual gait speed be used as a prognostic factor for early palliative care identification in hospitalized older patients? A prospective study on two different wards.

Authors:  Celine Van de Vyver; Anja Velghe; Hilde Baeyens; Jean-Pierre Baeyens; Julien Dekoninck; Nele Van Den Noortgate; Ruth Piers
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  A Systematic Review of the Development and Implementation of Needs-Based Palliative Care Tools in Heart Failure and Chronic Respiratory Disease.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Breanne Hobden; Kristy Fakes; Katherine Clark
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.