Literature DB >> 29499988

Consensus Based Definition of Growth Restriction in the Newborn.

Irene M Beune1, Frank H Bloomfield2, Wessel Ganzevoort3, Nicholas D Embleton4, Paul J Rozance5, Aleid G van Wassenaer-Leemhuis6, Klaske Wynia7, Sanne J Gordijn8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus definition of growth restriction in the newborn that can be used clinically to identify newborn infants at risk and in research to harmonize reporting and definition in the current absence of a gold standard. STUDY
DESIGN: An international panel of pediatric leaders in the field of neonatal growth were invited to participate in an electronic Delphi procedure using standardized methods and predefined consensus rules. Responses were fed back at group-level and the list of participants was provided. Nonresponders were excluded from subsequent rounds. In the first round, variables were scored on a 5-point Likert scale; in subsequent rounds, inclusion of variables and cut-offs were determined with a 70% level of agreement. In the final round participants selected the ultimate algorithm.
RESULTS: In total, 57 experts participated in the first round; 79% completed the procedure. Consensus was reached on the following definition: birth weight less than the third percentile, or 3 out of the following: birth weight <10th percentile; head circumference <10th percentile; length <10th percentile; prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction; and maternal pregnancy information.
CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was reached on a definition for growth restriction in the newborn. This definition recognizes that infants with birth weights <10th percentile may not be growth restricted and that infants with birth weights >10th percentile can be growth restricted. This definition can be adopted in clinical practice and in clinical trials to better focus on newborns at risk, and is complementary to the previously determined definition of fetal growth restriction.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Delphi; SGA; consensus; definition; fetal growth restriction; growth restriction; small for gestational age

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29499988     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.12.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  31 in total

Review 1.  Antenatal Programming of Hypertension: Paradigms, Paradoxes, and How We Move Forward.

Authors:  Andrew M South; Norrina B Allen
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  LIN28-let-7 axis regulates genes in immortalized human trophoblast cells by targeting the ARID3B-complex.

Authors:  Asghar Ali; Russell V Anthony; Gerrit J Bouma; Quinton A Winger
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 5.834

3.  INCIDENCE OF SMALL FOR GESTATIONAL AGE NEONATES, ACCORDING TO THE FENTON AND INTERGROWTH-21ST CURVES IN A LEVEL II MATERNITY.

Authors:  Claudia Malisano Barreto; Marley Aparecida Lambert Pereira; Anna Carolina Boni Rolim; Samira Ali Abbas; Dante Mario Langhi Junior; Amélia Miyashiro Nunes Dos Santos
Journal:  Rev Paul Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-03

Review 4.  Nutritional Assessment in Preterm Infants: A Practical Approach in the NICU.

Authors:  Luis Pereira-da-Silva; Daniel Virella; Christoph Fusch
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Development of a Core Outcome Set and Minimum Reporting Set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN (COSNEON): study protocol for a Delphi study.

Authors:  Martine Knol; Helena Wang; Frank Bloomfield; Tabitha Piet; Stefanie Damhuis; Asma Khalil; Wessel Ganzevoort; Sanne Gordijn
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 6.  Children Born with Congenital Heart Defects and Growth Restriction at Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ali Ghanchi; Neil Derridj; Damien Bonnet; Nathalie Bertille; Laurent J Salomon; Babak Khoshnood
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  T2* placental MRI in pregnancies complicated with fetal congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Johannes K Steinweg; Grace Tin Yan Hui; Maximilian Pietsch; Alison Ho; Milou Pm van Poppel; David Lloyd; Kathleen Colford; John M Simpson; Reza Razavi; Kuberan Pushparajah; Mary Rutherford; Jana Hutter
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  The ability of late pregnancy maternal tests to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with placental dysfunction (specifically fetal growth restriction and pre-eclampsia): a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Melanie Griffin; Alexander E P Heazell; Lucy C Chappell; Jian Zhao; Deborah A Lawlor
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-08

9.  Periodontal disease: Repercussions in pregnant woman and newborn health-A cohort study.

Authors:  Marina Guim Otsuka Padovan Figueiredo; Stefanie Yaemi Takita; Bianca Maria Ramos Dourado; Helderjan de Souza Mendes; Erick Olsen Terakado; Hélio Rubens de Carvalho Nunes; Cátia Regina Branco da Fonseca
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessment of neonatal EEG background and neurodevelopment in full-term small for their gestational age infants.

Authors:  José R Castro Conde; Candelaria González Campo; Nieves L González González; Beatriz Reyes Millán; Desiré González Barrios; Alejandro Jiménez Sosa; Itziar Quintero Fuentes
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 3.756

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.