Literature DB >> 29499843

Impact of Multidisciplinary Standardization of Care for Gastroschisis: Treatment, Outcomes, and Cost.

Candace Haddock1, Al Ghalgya Al Maawali1, Joseph Ting2, Julie Bedford3, Kourosh Afshar4, Erik D Skarsgard5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Elimination of unnecessary practice variation through standardization creates opportunities for improved outcomes and cost-effectiveness. A quality improvement (QI) initiative at our institution used evidence and consensus to standardize management of gastroschisis (GS) from birth to discharge.
METHODS: An interdisciplinary team utilized best practice evidence and expert opinion to standardize GS care. Following stakeholder engagement and education, care standardization was implemented in September 2014. A comparative cohort study was conducted on consecutive patients treated before (n=33) and after (n=24) standardization. Demographic, treatment, and outcome measures were collected from a prospective GS registry. Direct costs were estimated, and protocol compliance was audited.
RESULTS: BW, GA, and bowel injury severity were comparable between groups. Key practice changes were: closure technique (pre-88% primary fascial, post-83% umbilical cord flap; p<0.001), closure location (pre-97% OR, post-67% NICU; p<0.001), and GA avoidance (pre-0%, post-48%; p<0.001). Median post-closure ventilation days were shorter (pre-4, post-1; p<0.001), and SSI rates trended lower (pre-21%, post-8%; p=0.3) in the post-implementation group with no differences in TPN days or LOS. No significant difference was seen in average per-patient costs: pre-$85,725 ($29,974-221,061), post-$76,329 ($14,205-176,856).
CONCLUSION: Care standardization for GS enables practice transformation, cost-effective outcome improvement, and supports an organizational culture dedicated to continuous improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; Gastroschisis; Outcome; Quality improvement; Standardization

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29499843     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  4 in total

1.  Trends in incidence and outcomes of gastroschisis in the United States: analysis of the national inpatient sample 2010-2014.

Authors:  Parth Bhatt; Anusha Lekshminarayanan; Keyur Donda; Fredrick Dapaah-Siakwan; Badal Thakkar; Sumesh Parat; Shilpi Chabra; Zeenia Billimoria
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Variation in hospital costs for gastroschisis closure techniques.

Authors:  Melissa Wong; Assaf P Oron; Anna Faino; Susan Stanford; Jennifer Stevens; Claudia S Crowell; Patrick J Javid
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Relationship between volume and outcome for gastroschisis: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Johannes Morche; Tim Mathes; Anja Jacobs; Lucas Wessel; Edmund A M Neugebauer; Dawid Pieper
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-02

4.  Gastroschisis and late-onset neonatal sepsis in a tertiary referral center in Southeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Juliana Zoboli Del Bigio; Ana Cristina Aoun Tannuri; Mário Cícero Falcão; Werther Brunow de Carvalho; Felipe Yu Matsushita
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.990

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.