Literature DB >> 29499568

17-DMAG inhibits the multiplication of several Babesia species and Theileria equi on in vitro cultures, and Babesia microti in mice.

Azirwan Guswanto1, Arifin Budiman Nugraha2, Bumduuren Tuvshintulga3, Dickson Stuart Tayebwa4, Mohamed Abdo Rizk5, Gaber El-Saber Batiha6, Sambuu Gantuya7, Thillaiampalam Sivakumar8, Naoaki Yokoyama9, Ikuo Igarashi10.   

Abstract

Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a chaperone protein that stabilizes cells during stress or non-stress responses. Previous reports have shown that Hsp90 is a potential drug target to suppress the multiplication of several protozoan parasites. In this study, 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-DMAG), an Hsp90 inhibitor, was evaluated for its inhibitory effect on five in vitro cultures of Babesia and Theileria species, including B. bovis, B. bigemina, B. divergens, B. caballi, and T. equi, and on the multiplication of a B. microti-infected mouse model. 17-DMAG showed the inhibitory effect in all of the species tested. The half maximum inhibition concentration (IC50) of 17-DMAG on B. bovis, B. bigemina, B. divergens, B. caballi, and T. equi was 77.6 ± 2.9, 62.4 ± 1.9, 183.8 ± 3.2, 88.5 ± 9.6, and 307.7 ± 7.2 nM, respectively. The toxicity assay on MDBK and NIH/3T3 cell lines showed that 17-DMAG affected the viability of cells with an IC50 of 15.5 ± 4 and 8.8 ± 2 μM, respectively. Since the IC50s were much lower on the parasites than on the host cell lines, the selectivity index were high for all tested species. Furthermore, the two-drug combination of 17-DMAG with diminazene aceturate (DA) and atovaquone (AV) showed synergism or addition on in vitro cultures of Babesia and Theileria parasites. In the mouse model, 17-DMAG at a concentration of 30 mg/kg BW effectively inhibited the multiplication of B. microti. Moreover, if combined with DA or AV, 17-DMAG showed a comparable inhibition at the half dose. Taken together, these results indicate that 17-DMAG is a potent drug for treating piroplamosis. The data warrant further evaluation of 17-DMAG as an antibabesial drug and as an option in combination with atovaquone for the treatment of human babesiosis.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  17-DMAG; Babesia; Chemotherapeutic; Hsp90 inhibitor; Theileria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29499568      PMCID: PMC6114103          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2018.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist        ISSN: 2211-3207            Impact factor:   4.077


Introduction

The chemoprophylaxis agents against babesiosis in the livestock industries remain inadequate. After decades of use, diminazene aceturate and imidocarb dipropionate are still the first choices for the treatment of animals (Suarez and Noh, 2011; Oliveira and de Freitas, 2015). However, several problems such as the development of a resistant parasite, toxicity, drug residues, and withdrawal issues constrain the use of these drugs in many countries (Kuttler, 1980; Coldham et al., 1995; Baldissera et al., 2016). Furthermore, they are not approved for human medicine. The preferable treatment of babesiosis in humans is the combination of atovaquone with azithromycin due to their low side effects (Krause et al., 2000). Yet Plasmodium falciparum rapidly developed resistance when atovaquone was used as a single drug (Korsinczky et al., 2000). Another report showed the relapse of Babesia gibsoni due to the change of amino acid in the mitochondrial cytochrome B that led to a reduction in the efficacy of atovaquone (Matsuu et al., 2006). Therefore, continuous efforts to discover and develop new effective drugs against babesiosis are very important. Heat shock proteins (Hsps), which are present in most eukaryotes and prokaryotes, are involved in stabilizing their client proteins to enable appropriate functions during a stress or non-stress response (Kumar et al., 1990; Ruef et al., 2000). Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90), one of the Hsp classes, is conserved among organisms (Chen et al., 2006). Due to its important role in supporting the cellular mechanism, this protein has been targeted for combating cancer cells in humans (Kim et al., 2009). In protozoan parasites, the protein has been reported to regulate the cellular processes in zoonotic protozoan parasites such as Plasmodium, Toxoplasma, Trypanosoma, and Leishmania (Banumathy et al., 2003; Angel et al., 2013). Furthermore, several studies have shown the effectiveness of Hsp90 as drug target for infectious diseases (Pizarro et al., 2013; Gillan et al., 2014). The first inhibitor found specifically to bind Hsp90 was geldanamycin, which was isolated from the bacterium Streptomyces hygroscopicus. The inhibition of geldanamycin on Hsp90 led to the degradation of its client proteins. However, geldanamycin has poor solubility, induces liver damage, and is toxic to the erythrocyte (Jilani et al., 2013). Many analogs have been developed on the basis of geldanamycin, such as 17-AAG (tanespimycin, 17-N-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin) and 17-DMAG (alvespimycin, 17-dimethylaminoethylamino-17-demethoxy geldanamycin). 17-AAG has less hepatotoxicity than geldanamycin. It has been evaluated in cancer studies and, in protozoan parasites, showed growth inhibition on a rodent model of malaria (Pallavi et al., 2010). However, like geldanamycin, 17-AAG also showed poor solubility, and its clinical trial in cancer has been halted. On the other hand, 17-DMAG is a water soluble. It has been evaluated on the in vitro culture and mouse model of Trypanosoma brucei. The result showed a very low IC50 on the parasite and a high selectivity index over mammalian cells, resulting in a great potency of this compound as an antitrypanosomal agent (Meyer and Shapiro, 2013). This study aimed to evaluate the inhibition of 17-DMAG on the multiplication of bovine Babesia (B. bovis and B. bigemina), bovine Babesia that is also known to infect humans (B. divergens), equine piroplasms parasites (B. caballi and T. equi), and rodent Babesia that also infects humans (B. microti). The evaluations were performed using in vitro cultures of bovine and equine species and, for B. microti, using a mouse model. The cytotoxicity of 17-DMAG was also evaluated using mammalian cells including Madin-Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK) and mouse embryonic fibroblast (NIH/3T3) cell lines.

Materials and methods

Parasites

Babesia parasite cultures were maintained using a microaerophilic stationary-phase culture system (Levy and Ristic, 1980; Avarzed et al., 1997; Igarashi et al., 1998). Briefly, bovine Babesia parasites were grown in bovine red blood cells (RBC) in the specific complete medium for each species. The medium for B. bovis (Texas strain) contained GIT medium supplemented with 10% bovine serum, while the medium for B. bigemina (Argentina strain) and B. divergens (Germany strain) was Medium 199 and RPMI 1640 medium, respectively, supplemented with 40% bovine serum (Rizk et al., 2016). B. caballi (USDA strain) was grown using equine RBC in GIT medium supplemented with 10% equine serum. T. equi (USDA strain) was grown in equine RBC in M199 medium supplemented with 40% equine serum and hypoxanthine (MP Biomedicals, USA) at a final concentration of 13.6 μg/ml. All of the media included 60 U/ml penicillin G, 60 μg/ml streptomycin, and 0.15 μg/ml amphotericin B (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified chamber with an atmosphere of 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2. B. microti (Munich strain) was recovered from −80 °C stock in two 6-week female Balb/c mice (Clea, Japan). The parasitemia was monitored every 2 days. After parasitemia reached approximately 30%, mice were euthanized, and blood was collected by cardiac puncture to initiate the in vivo experiment (Goo et al., 2010). The animal experiment was conducted in accordance with The Regulations for Animal Experiments of Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Japan (Accession numbers 28-111-2, 28-110, and 1417-2).

Reagents and chemicals

17-DMAG (Focus Biomolecules, USA), diminazene aceturate (DA, Sigma-Aldrich, Japan), and atovaquone (AV, Sigma-Aldrich, Japan) were diluted in DMSO to make a 10 mM stock solution, which was stored at −30 °C until use in the in vitro experiment. For the in vivo experiment, each compound was weighed according to the average mouse weight and dissolved with a suitable solvent before use. A lysis buffer containing tris-HCl (130 mM; pH 7.5), EDTA (10 mM), saponin (0.016%; w/v), and Triton X-100 (1.6% v/v) was prepared, filtered through 0.22 μm of polyethersulfone, and stored at 4 °C. Prior to fluorescence measurement, the lysis buffer was mixed with 0.2 μl/ml SYBR Green I (10,000x, Lonza, USA).

Effect of 17-DMAG on the erythrocytes of bovines and equines, and on uninfected mice

Prior to the subculture of parasites, bovine and equine RBC were incubated with 1 μM of 17-DMAG for 3 h. The RBC were washed three times with PBS and mixed with B. bovis and T. equi parasitized RBC to obtain 1% parasitemia (infected RBC). Subsequently, 100 μl of infected RBC was added to 900 μl of complete medium in a 24-well plate. The untreated erythrocytes were used as a control. The parasitemia was monitored daily via microscopy observation of a Giemsa-stained blood smear for 4 days. Furthermore, the effect of 17-DMAG on mice was evaluated using 8-week-old BALB/c mice. Groups 1 and 2, consisting of three mice each, received intraperitoneal injections of 17-DMAG at a concentration of 15 and 30 mg/kg BW, respectively, for 5 days. One group (three mice) remained as an untreated control. The changes in body weight and hematology profiles, including RBC, hematocrit, and hemoglobin, were observed for 20 days.

Inhibition assay of 17-DMAG and combination with diminazene aceturate and atovaquone in vitro

The assays were conducted in accordance with the protocol described previously with modification (Guswanto et al., 2014). Briefly, the cultures of B. bovis, B. bigemina, B. divergens, B. caballi, and T. equi with a parasitemia of 8%, 3%, 10%, 4%, and 9%, respectively, were harvested and adjusted to 1% parasitemia with fresh RBC before the inhibition assay. The 60 inner wells of a 96-well plate were used in the assay, while the peripheral wells were filled with sterile distillate water to reduce evaporation during incubation. To each well in triplicate, 2.5 μl of infected RBC (5 μl for B. divergens, B. caballi, and T. equi) was added and mixed with a culture medium containing the drug to a total volume of 100 μl. The stock solution of 17-DMAG, DA, and AV was dissolved in a culture medium at various concentrations using two-fold dilution. A culture medium containing DMSO at a final concentration of 0.2% was added to the well with infected RBC as a positive control and to the well with uninfected RBC as a negative control. Furthermore, a drug combination assay was conducted in parallel with the single drug assay at the constant ratio in accordance with the Chou–Talalay method (Chou, 2006). In the same plate with a single drug inhibition assay, a two-drug combination (DA+17-DMAG, DA + AV, and 17-DMAG + AV) at concentrations of 0.25 x IC50, 0.5 x IC50, IC50, 2 x IC50, and 4 x IC50 was added to the well containing infected RBC in triplicate. The plate was incubated in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2, 5% O2, and 90% N2. After 96 h, 100 μl of a lysis buffer containing SYBR Green I was added to each well. The plate was wrapped with aluminum foil to avoid direct light exposure and incubated at room temperature. After incubation for 6 h, fluorescence values were measured using a fluorescence spectrophotometer (Fluoroskan Ascent, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with the excitation and emission wavelength at 485 nm and 518 nm, respectively. The fluorescence data were subtracted from the negative control and used to calculate the IC50.

Cell cultures

MDBK and NIH/3T3 cells were maintained in 75 cm2 culture flasks with MEM medium (Gibco, Life Technologies, USA) and DMEM (Gibco, Life Technologies, USA), respectively, and cultured in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Each medium was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 0.5% penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco, Life Technologies, USA), and an additional 1% glutamine. The medium was changed every 3–4 days and incubated until approximately 80% confluent. The cells were free from mycoplasma contamination after being checked by staining with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). The detachment of cells from the culture flask was done using TrypLE™ Express (Gibco, Life Technologies, USA) after washing two times with Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS). Subsequently, the counting of viable cells was carried out using a Neubauer improved C-Chip (NanoEntek Inc., Korea) after staining with 0.4% trypan blue solution.

Cytotoxicity assay of 17-DMAG, diminazene aceturate, and atovaquone on MDBK and NIH/3T3 cell lines

The drug-exposure viability assay was performed in accordance with the recommendation of the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo, Japan). Briefly, the assay was carried out using a 96-well plate at 37 °C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2. One hundred microliters of cells at a density of 5 × 104 cells/ml was seeded per well and allowed to attach to the plate for 24 h. Ten microliters of twofold drug dilutions was added to each well to a final concentration of 0.312–40 μM in triplicate. The wells with only a culture medium were used as blanks, while the wells containing cells in a medium with 0.4% DMSO were used as negative control, representing the highest concentration of drug solvent. The exposure of drugs was carried out for 24 h, followed by the addition of 10 μl of CCK-8. The plate was further incubated for 3 h, and the absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader.

Inhibition assay using a B. microti–infected mouse model

The inhibitory effect of 17-DMAG was also determined using a B. microti mouse model according to the previous protocol (Goo et al., 2010). Briefly, 35 female BALB/c mice aged 8 weeks received an intraperitoneal injection of 1 × 107 of B. microti–infected RBC and were divided into seven groups. Another group consisting of five mice was kept uninfected and untreated as a control. The multiplication of B. microti was observed from blood smears after staining with Giemsa using a light microscope. The drug treatment was initiated to all infected mice on day five, after the parasitemia reached approximately 1%, and continue to the total of five consecutive days. Group 1 was treated with 4% DMSO in saline water as a control intraperitoneally. Groups 2–4 received an intraperitoneal injection of 30 mg/kg BW of 17-DMAG, an injection of 25 mg/kg BW of DA, and oral administration of 20 mg/kg BW of AV, respectively. Groups 5–7 were treated with a combination of 17-DMAG + DA (15 + 15 mg/kg BW), 17-DMAG + AV (15 + 10 mg/kg BW), and DA + AV (15 + 10 mg/kg BW), respectively, via a route similar to that for the single drug. The parasitemia was estimated from Giemsa-stained blood smears using microscopy in approximately 5000 RBC. Furthermore, the hematology profiles including RBC, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were measured from 10 μl of mouse blood using an automatic hematology analyzer (Celltac α MEK-6450, Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan). The rate of parasitemia, hematology profiles, and mouse body weight was monitored for 60 days. The experiment was repeated once so each group contained 10 mice.

Statistical analysis

The IC50 of 17-DMAG, DA, and AV was calculated from the percentage of inhibition on the in vitro multiplication of all tested species using non-linear regression (curve fit), available in GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., USA). Combination index (CI) values for the drug combination were calculated using CompuSyn software (Chou, 2006). Since the chemotherapy effect is preferable at the highest inhibition, the degree of synergism was determined as the weighted average of CI values using a formula ((1 x IC50) + (2 x IC75) + (3 x IC90) + (4 x IC95))/10 (Chou, 2006). The differences among groups regarding the parasitemia, hematology profiles, and body weight in the B. microti–infected mouse model were analyzed using Student's t-test, available in GraphPad Prism software. The difference was considered significant if P < 0.05.

Results

Original data of this study including percent inhibition of drug on each parasite, drug combination data, and in vivo observations during drug treatment including parasitemia, mice body weight, and hematology profiles are available at Mendeley Data (https://doi.org/10.17632/6sdnnh9hng.1).

17-DMAG inhibition of Babesia and Theileria parasite multiplication in vitro

The preliminary evaluation of 17-DMAG was conducted to determine its direct effect on host RBC. Bovine and equine RBC were incubated with 17-DMAG (1 μM) for 3 h prior to the subculture of B. bovis and T. equi. Microscopy observation and parasitemia counting showed that the multiplication of B. bovis and T. equi did not significantly differ between 17-DMAG-treated RBC and normal RBC for either species. Evaluation was also conducted using mice. Mouse body weight was reduced slightly in the group of 30 mg/kg BW on day 10 post treatment but was not significantly different from that of the control group, while the group of 15 mg/kg BW did not show any effect (Supplementary Fig. S1). For the multiplication inhibitory effect, the assay was conducted on five species: B. bovis, B. bigemina, B. divergens, B. caballi, and T. equi. 17-DMAG inhibited the multiplication of all species tested (Fig. 1). The IC50 of 17-DMAG on B. bovis, B. bigemina, B. divergens, B. caballi, and T. equi was 77.6 ± 2.9, 62.4 ± 1.9, 183.8 ± 3.2, 88.5 ± 9.6, and 307.7 ± 7.2 nM, respectively (Table 1). Compared with other drugs tested in this study, 17-DMAG was more effective than DA for B. bovis, B. bigemina, and B. divergens (Supplementary Fig. S2). It was also more effective for B. bigemina and B. caballi compared with the IC50 of AV (Supplementary Fig. S3).
Fig. 1

Dose response curve of 17-DMAG on the

The parasitemia of B. bovis, B. bigemina, B. divergens, B. caballi, and T. equi after exposure to various concentrations of 17-DMAG for 96 h as determined by SG-based fluorescence assay. The percentage of inhibition is expressed as the percentage of inhibited parasites compared with the positive control (untreated wells) after subtracting the negative control (uninfected RBC). The data were the mean and S.D. from triplicate experiments.

Table 1

The IC50 and selectivity index of 17-DMAG, diminazene aceturate, and atovaquone.

DrugParasitesIC50 (nM)aIC50 (μM)b
Selectivity indexc
NIH/3T3MDBKNIH/3T3MDBK
17-DMAGB. bovis77.6 ± 2.915.5 ± 4.08.8 ± 2.0200113
B. bigemina62.4 ± 1.9248141
B. divergens183.8 ± 3.28448
B. caballi88.5 ± 9.617599
T. equi307.7 ± 7.25029



DAB. bovis189.8 ± 42.1>40>40>211>211
B. bigemina1852 ± 104>22>22
B. divergens377.5 ± 39.3>106>106
B. caballi13.4 ± 3.6>2985>2985
T. equi59. ± 8.5>668>668



AVB. bovis39.7 ± 2.4>40>40>1008>1008
B. bigemina706.1 ± 38.7>57>57
B. divergens13.4 ± 1.4>2985>2985
B. caballi101.9 ± 14.1>393>393
T. equi95.0 ± 65>421>421

Half maximum inhibition concentration of each drug on the in vitro culture of parasites. The value was determined from the dose-response curve using non-linear regression (curve fit analysis). The values are the mean and standard deviation of triplicate experiments.

Half maximum effective concentration of each drug on cell lines. The values were determined from the dose-response curve using non-linear regression (curve fit analysis). The values are the mean and standard deviation of triplicate experiments.

Ratio of the IC50 on cell lines to the IC50 on each species. High numbers are favorable.

Dose response curve of 17-DMAG on the The parasitemia of B. bovis, B. bigemina, B. divergens, B. caballi, and T. equi after exposure to various concentrations of 17-DMAG for 96 h as determined by SG-based fluorescence assay. The percentage of inhibition is expressed as the percentage of inhibited parasites compared with the positive control (untreated wells) after subtracting the negative control (uninfected RBC). The data were the mean and S.D. from triplicate experiments. The IC50 and selectivity index of 17-DMAG, diminazene aceturate, and atovaquone. Half maximum inhibition concentration of each drug on the in vitro culture of parasites. The value was determined from the dose-response curve using non-linear regression (curve fit analysis). The values are the mean and standard deviation of triplicate experiments. Half maximum effective concentration of each drug on cell lines. The values were determined from the dose-response curve using non-linear regression (curve fit analysis). The values are the mean and standard deviation of triplicate experiments. Ratio of the IC50 on cell lines to the IC50 on each species. High numbers are favorable.

Combination of 17-DMAG with diminazene aceturate and atovaquone on in vitro cultures

The drug combination analysis was to determine whether the combined treatments are synergism (give a greater effect), additive (similar effect), or antagonism (reduce or block the effect). Five dilutions of 17-DMAG, as recommended in the Chou–Talalay method (Chou, 2006), were combined at a constant ratio of DA or AV. The percentage of inhibition of the single drug and each combination was analyzed using CompuSyn software to generate the combination index (CI) value at IC50, IC75, IC90, and IC95 (Table 2). The weighted average CI values were visualized using a polygonogram (Fig. 2). The drug combination was considered as synergism if the value was less than 0.90, additive if the value was at a range of 0.90–1.10, and antagonism if the value was more than 1.10. Our results showed that the combination of 17-DMAG with DA was synergistic on B. bovis, B. caballi, and T. equi, while that with AV was synergistic on B. divergens and B. caballi. Other species showed additive effects, and none of the combinations showed antagonism.
Table 2

Combination index (CI) value of a two-drug combination between 17-DMAG, diminazene aceturate, and atovaquone.

ParasitesDrug combinationsaCI value at
Weighted average CI valuesbDegree of synergismc
IC50ICc5IC90IC95
B. bovis17-DMAG + DA0.8680.8530.8420.8380.845Synergism
17-DMAG + AV1.2551.0510.8840.7870.916Additive
DA + AV0.7250.7250.7260.7270.726Synergism



B. bigemina17-DMAG + DA1.3531.1941.0540.9681.077Additive
17-DMAG + AV1.1811.0730.9830.9301.000Additive
DA + AV1.0541.0060.9690.9490.977Additive



B. divergens17-DMAG + DA1.8501.2690.8700.6730.969Additive
17-DMAG + AV2.0721.1110.6130.4160.779Synergism
DA + AV1.2170.8760.6500.5390.707Synergism



B. caballi17-DMAG + DA0.6930.5030.3870.3320.419Synergism
17-DMAG + AV1.0850.7890.5740.4630.624Synergism
DA + AV0.2900.2880.3030.3210.306Synergism



T. equi17-DMAG + DA1.1680.7860.5910.5030.653Synergism
17-DMAG + AV1.2241.0330.8720.7780.902Additive
DA + AV0.9250.6520.5260.4720.569Synergism

CI value, combination index value; IC50, 50% inhibition concentration; DA, diminazene aceturate; AV, atovaquone.

Two-drug combination between 17-DMAG, diminazene aceturate, and atovaquone at a concentration of approximately 0.25 x IC50, 0.5 x IC50, IC50, 2 x IC50, and 4 x IC50 (constant ratio).

The higher inhibition is preferable, thus the weighted average CI value was calculated with the formula ((1 x IC50) + (2 x IC75) + (3 x IC90) + (4 x IC95))/10.

The degree of synergism was determined based on the following CI value: < 0.90 (synergism), 0.90–1.10 (additive), and >1.10 (antagonism).

Fig. 2

Polygonogram of the degree of synergism.

The polygonogram of synergism between 17-DMAG, diminazene aceturate (DA), and atovaquone (AV) based on the weighted average of combination index values (CIs) at IC50, IC75, IC90, and IC95 using the formula ((1 x IC50) + (2 x IC75) + (3 x IC90) + (4 x IC95))/10 (Chou, 2006). The degree of synergism was determined based on the following CI value: < 0.90 (synergism), 0.90–1.10 (additive), and >1.10 (antagonism).

Combination index (CI) value of a two-drug combination between 17-DMAG, diminazene aceturate, and atovaquone. CI value, combination index value; IC50, 50% inhibition concentration; DA, diminazene aceturate; AV, atovaquone. Two-drug combination between 17-DMAG, diminazene aceturate, and atovaquone at a concentration of approximately 0.25 x IC50, 0.5 x IC50, IC50, 2 x IC50, and 4 x IC50 (constant ratio). The higher inhibition is preferable, thus the weighted average CI value was calculated with the formula ((1 x IC50) + (2 x IC75) + (3 x IC90) + (4 x IC95))/10. The degree of synergism was determined based on the following CI value: < 0.90 (synergism), 0.90–1.10 (additive), and >1.10 (antagonism). Polygonogram of the degree of synergism. The polygonogram of synergism between 17-DMAG, diminazene aceturate (DA), and atovaquone (AV) based on the weighted average of combination index values (CIs) at IC50, IC75, IC90, and IC95 using the formula ((1 x IC50) + (2 x IC75) + (3 x IC90) + (4 x IC95))/10 (Chou, 2006). The degree of synergism was determined based on the following CI value: < 0.90 (synergism), 0.90–1.10 (additive), and >1.10 (antagonism).

Toxicity of 17-DMAG on MDBK and NIH/3T3 cell lines

17-DMAG showed an effective inhibitory effect similar to that with currently used drugs, DA and AV, on the in vitro culture of Babesia and Theileria parasites. The effect of 17-DMAG on the host was evaluated using MDBK and NIH/3T3 cell lines. The IC50 of 17-DMAG on MDBK cells was 8.8 ± 2 μM, while that on NIH/3T3 cells was 15.5 ± 4 μM. The result showed that 17-DMAG is more toxic than DA and AV. In a separate assay, DA and AV at a concentration of 40 μM did not show any inhibition on MDBK and NIH/3T3 cell viability. The selectivity index, defined as the ratio of cell line IC50 to the parasite IC50, is shown in Table 1. For the NIH/3T3 cells, the highest selectivity index of 17-DMAG was found to be 248 times higher than the IC50 on B. bigemina, while the lowest was on T. equi with a selectivity index of 50. The highest and lowest selectivity index for MDBK cells was also determined on B. bigemina and T. equi, respectively.

17-DMAG inhibition of B. microti multiplication using a mouse model

The inhibitory effect of 17-DMAG was further evaluated on the multiplication of B. microti. The experiment was carried out using a mouse model, since the in vitro culture of B. microti is not well established. The mice were divided into eight groups (five mice/group), corresponding to single drug treatment, controls, and combinations of 17-DMAG, DA, and AV. The drugs were combined at approximately half the concentration of single drug treatment. The experiment was conducted two times, with each group containing 10 mice. In the DMSO control group, the multiplication of B. microti increased significantly and reached the highest parasitemia at 45.6 ± 10.5% on day 9 post infection (p.i). The parasitemia decreased gradually on the following days. On day 60, B. microti was still detected in four mice. B. microti in the 17-DMAG 30 mg/kg BW group reached peak parasitemia (4.7 ± 2.0%) on day 10 p.i., and no parasite was detected via microscopy starting on day 36 p.i. Similar inhibition was observed on the DA (25 mg/kg BW) and AV (20 mg/kg BW) groups, but the parasite had disappeared from blood smears by day 28 (Fig. 3A). However, 17-DMAG seems to be a slow-acting drug as compared with DA and AV, since it postponed the peak of parasitemia even though it had an inhibitory effect. The combination of 17-DMAG (15 mg/kg BW) with DA (15 mg/kg BW) or AV (10 mg/kg BW) also showed an inhibitory effect comparable to that with a single treatment at a higher dose (Fig. 3B). However, the parasite clearance was faster than that of single drug treatments. The parasite was not detected in the blood smear on the day 24 p.i in the 17-DMAG + DA (15 + 15 mg/kg BW) group and in the DA + AV (15 + 10 mg/kg BW) group. In the DM + AV (15 + 10 mg/kg BW) group, the parasite clearance was observed on day 28 p.i. Furthermore, infection with B. microti reduces the hematocrit, RBC, and hemoglobin concentration in mouse blood, as observed in the DMSO control group on day 10 p.i. (P < 0.0001). Significant differences in mouse body weight were observed between the DMSO control group and all drug-treated groups except for the DA (25 mg/kg BW) group (Fig. 4A). The RBC (Fig. 4B), hemoglobin (Fig. S4.A), and hematocrit counts (Fig. S4.B) were also determined to be significantly different between the DMSO control group and all drug-treated groups (P < 0.0001).
Fig. 3

Effect of drug treatment on the growth of

(A) Parasitemia after treatment with 17-DMAG, diminazene aceturate (DA), and atovaquone (AV) at a concentration of 30, 25, and 20 mg/kg body weight, respectively. (B) Parasitemia after treatment with the combination of 17-DMAG and DA at 15 mg/kg BW each, 17-DMAG with AV at 15 and 10 mg/kg BW, respectively, and a combination of DA and AV at 15 and 10 mg/kg BW, respectively. Drug administrations were started from day 4 until day 8 post infection (left right arrow). The data were the mean and S.D. from two separate experiments (in total of 10 mice per group).

Fig. 4

Body weight and hematology profiles of mice on day 10 post infection.

The observation of mouse body weight (A) and red blood cell count (B) of mice on day 10 post infection. All data were the mean and S.D. from 10 mice in each group as a comparison with DMSO control and healthy control. The significant differences are marked with * if P is less than 0.05, ** if P is less than 0.01, and *** if P is less than 0.001.

Effect of drug treatment on the growth of (A) Parasitemia after treatment with 17-DMAG, diminazene aceturate (DA), and atovaquone (AV) at a concentration of 30, 25, and 20 mg/kg body weight, respectively. (B) Parasitemia after treatment with the combination of 17-DMAG and DA at 15 mg/kg BW each, 17-DMAG with AV at 15 and 10 mg/kg BW, respectively, and a combination of DA and AV at 15 and 10 mg/kg BW, respectively. Drug administrations were started from day 4 until day 8 post infection (left right arrow). The data were the mean and S.D. from two separate experiments (in total of 10 mice per group). Body weight and hematology profiles of mice on day 10 post infection. The observation of mouse body weight (A) and red blood cell count (B) of mice on day 10 post infection. All data were the mean and S.D. from 10 mice in each group as a comparison with DMSO control and healthy control. The significant differences are marked with * if P is less than 0.05, ** if P is less than 0.01, and *** if P is less than 0.001.

Discussion

Treatment of babesiosis remains a significant challenge, especially in the livestock industries. Although diminazene aceturate and imidocarb dipropionate are still effective, current reports showed the development of resistance in Trypanosoma evansi in cattle and a relapse of B. gibsoni in dogs (Witola et al., 2005; Rajapakshage et al., 2012; Baldissera et al., 2016). Many inhibitors have been reported to be effective against in vitro or in vivo multiplication of Babesia and Theileria parasites; however, all of them are in research and still far from clinical trial (Mosqueda et al., 2012). Furthermore, the emergence of human babesiosis brings a new urgency to find an effective inhibitor of babesiosis. Atovaquone, which is effective on Plasmodium, was also found to inhibit the multiplication of Babesia parasites (Vial and Gorenflot, 2006). Since this drug was reported to be less toxic to host cells, its combination with azithromycin is currently suggested for the treatment of human babesiosis. However, the development of a resistant parasite limited the use of atovaquone. Therefore, the evaluation of a new potent compound against Babesia and Theileria parasites will provide more options for treatment of the disease both in humans and domestic animals. This study showed that 17-DMAG inhibits the multiplication of several Babesia species and Theileria equi in vitro. Its ability to bind Hsp90 causes a significant reduction in parasite survival. Hsp90 is conserved in most organisms, including Babesia and Theileria parasites. There are some isoforms of Hsp90 in B. bovis based on reported full genome sequences (Brayton et al., 2007). These proteins protect the organism during physical and non-physical stress and enable the proper synthesis and stabilization of its client proteins. Targeting Hsp90 is more relevant in cancer treatment because many cancer Hsp90–related client proteins are involved in the progression of cancer cells (Miyata et al., 2013). However, recent studies showed that the inhibition of parasite Hsp90 could disrupt the stage differentiation of parasites such as Toxoplasma gondii (Echeverria et al., 2005), Plasmodium falciparum (Banumathy et al., 2003), Eimeria tenella (Péroval et al., 2006), Trypanosoma brucei (Meyer and Shapiro, 2013), and Theileria annulata (Kinnaird et al., 2017) that lead to the halt of their growth. In agreement with those previous studies, we hypothesized that 17-DMAG might be attached to the binding domain of Babesia and Theileria parasite Hsp90, causing insufficient binding of client proteins to Hsp90 and disrupting the normal multiplication of parasites. Hsp90 is also conserved in the host cells, which means that the binding of the inhibitor to the host's Hsp90 is possible. For this reason, the inhibitor should specifically bind to the parasite Hsp90 to avoid toxicity to the host. The basis of Hsp90 as a drug target in Plasmodium falciparum was the increasing ATPase activities in this species compared with human Hsp90. The high stress conditions during parasite invasion of host cells might increase the activity of their Hsp90 and evolved significantly (Pallavi et al., 2010). Our study of MDBK and NIH/3T3 cells showed that the selectivity index of 17-DMAG was quite high among the species tested. This means that 17-DMAG was more likely to bind to the Babesia and Theileria Hsp90 than to the host Hsp90. Similar to Plasmodium falciparum, Babesia and Theileria parasites experience high stress during their invasion of host cells. Further study of the biochemical characterization of Hsp90 in Babesia and Theileria is required to better understand the potency of this protein as a drug target. The potency of 17-DMAG as an inhibitor was further evaluated in a combination study using DA and AV. The cytotoxicity assay showed that 17-DMAG was more toxic than DA and AV. The combination study aimed to enhance the potency of 17-DMAG while reducing the dose that led to reduced toxicity. Our results demonstrated that the combination of 17-DMAG and DA or AV against all species was range from synergism to additive. Therefore, the combination of 17-DMAG and DA might have potential as a novel regime for treating piroplasmosis in a wide range of animals. Furthermore, 17-DMAG might be used as a treatment option in combination with AV for the treatment of human babesiosis. The potent effect of 17-DMAG combined with DA or AV was also observed on the multiplication of B. microti in a mouse model. The combination of 17-DMAG with DA or AV at a half dose showed a multiplication inhibition comparable to that of those single drugs at full dose. Hematology profiles such as RBC count, hemoglobin, and hematocrit were also improved compared with the DMSO control group, as were parasitemia and mouse body weight. Taken together, these results indicate that 17-DMAG is a potent antibabesial and antitheilerial drug, as confirmed by the inhibition of five species, B. bovis, B. bigemina, B. divergens, B. caballi, and T. equi on in vitro cultures and B. microti in vivo. Even though 17-DMAG showed toxicity in the host cells, its combination with diminazene aceturate and atovaquone could improve the effect while reducing the toxicity.
  35 in total

1.  Babesia bigemina: in vitro and in vivo effects of curdlan sulfate on growth of parasites.

Authors:  I Igarashi; F K Njonge; Y Kaneko; Y Nakamura
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.011

2.  Nerolidol nanospheres increases its trypanocidal efficacy against Trypanosoma evansi: New approach against diminazene aceturate resistance and toxicity.

Authors:  Matheus D Baldissera; Thirssa H Grando; Carine F Souza; Luciana F Cossetin; Michele R Sagrillo; Kátia Nascimento; Ana P T da Silva; Daiane F Dalla Lana; Aleksandro S Da Silva; Lenita M Stefani; Silvia G Monteiro
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.011

3.  Evaluation of a fluorescence-based method for antibabesial drug screening.

Authors:  Azirwan Guswanto; Thillaiampalam Sivakumar; Mohamed Abdo Rizk; Shimaa Abd Elsalam Elsayed; Mohamed Ahmed Youssef; ElSaid El Shirbini ElSaid; Naoaki Yokoyama; Ikuo Igarashi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Geldanamycin-induced phosphatidylserine translocation in the erythrocyte membrane.

Authors:  Kashif Jilani; Syed M Qadri; Florian Lang
Journal:  Cell Physiol Biochem       Date:  2013-12-03

5.  Artesunate, a potential drug for treatment of Babesia infection.

Authors:  Youn-Kyoung Goo; M Alaa Terkawi; Honglin Jia; G Oluga Aboge; Hideo Ooka; Bryce Nelson; Suk Kim; Fujiko Sunaga; Kazuhiko Namikawa; Ikuo Igarashi; Yoshifumi Nishikawa; Xuenan Xuan
Journal:  Parasitol Int       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 6.  Emerging perspectives in the research of bovine babesiosis and anaplasmosis.

Authors:  Carlos E Suarez; Susan Noh
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.738

7.  Human immune response directed against Plasmodium falciparum heat shock-related proteins.

Authors:  N Kumar; Y Zhao; P Graves; J Perez Folgar; L Maloy; H Zheng
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Imidocarb residues in edible bovine tissues and in vitro assessment of imidocarb metabolism and cytotoxicity.

Authors:  N G Coldham; A S Moore; M Dave; P J Graham; S Sivapathasundaram; B G Lake; M J Sauer
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.922

9.  Potent antitrypanosomal activities of heat shock protein 90 inhibitors in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Kirsten J Meyer; Theresa A Shapiro
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 5.226

10.  Comparative genomics and evolution of the HSP90 family of genes across all kingdoms of organisms.

Authors:  Bin Chen; Daibin Zhong; Antónia Monteiro
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  11 in total

1.  Tafenoquine Is a Promising Drug Candidate for the Treatment of Babesiosis.

Authors:  Mingming Liu; Shengwei Ji; Daisuke Kondoh; Eloiza May Galon; Jixu Li; Mizuki Tomihari; Masashi Yanagawa; Michihito Tagawa; Mami Adachi; Masahito Asada; Ikuo Igarashi; Aiko Iguchi; Xuenan Xuan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Development and Characterization of PLGA Nanoparticles Containing 17-DMAG, an Hsp90 Inhibitor.

Authors:  Kercia P Cruz; Beatriz F C Patricio; Vinícius C Pires; Marina F Amorim; Alan G S F Pinho; Helenita C Quadros; Diana A S Dantas; Marcelo H C Chaves; Fabio R Formiga; Helvécio V A Rocha; Patrícia S T Veras
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 5.221

3.  The effects of trans-chalcone and chalcone 4 hydrate on the growth of Babesia and Theileria.

Authors:  Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Amany Magdy Beshbishy; Dickson Stuart Tayebwa; Oluyomi Stephen Adeyemi; Hazem Shaheen; Naoaki Yokoyama; Ikuo Igarashi
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2019-05-24

4.  Evaluation of the inhibitory effect of ivermectin on the growth of Babesia and Theileria parasites in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Amani Magdy Beshbishy; Dickson Stuart Tayebwa; Oluyomi Stephen Adeyemi; Naoaki Yokoyama; Ikuo Igarashi
Journal:  Trop Med Health       Date:  2019-07-11

5.  Screening the Medicines for Malaria Venture Pathogen Box against piroplasm parasites.

Authors:  Arifin Budiman Nugraha; Bumduuren Tuvshintulga; Azirwan Guswanto; Dickson Stuart Tayebwa; Mohamed Abdo Rizk; Sambuu Gantuya; Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Amany Magdy Beshbishy; Thillaiampalam Sivakumar; Naoaki Yokoyama; Ikuo Igarashi
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Safety and efficacy of hydroxyurea and eflornithine against most blood parasites Babesia and Theileria.

Authors:  Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Amany Magdy Beshbishy; Oluyomi Stephen Adeyemi; Eman Nadwa; Eman Rashwan; Naoaki Yokoyama; Ikuo Igarashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Unravelling the cellular and molecular pathogenesis of bovine babesiosis: is the sky the limit?

Authors:  Carlos E Suarez; Heba F Alzan; Marta G Silva; Vignesh Rathinasamy; William A Poole; Brian M Cooke
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 3.981

8.  Anti-Trypanosoma cruzi Activity of Metabolism Modifier Compounds.

Authors:  Nieves Martinez-Peinado; Clara Martori; Nuria Cortes-Serra; Julian Sherman; Ana Rodriguez; Joaquim Gascon; Jordi Alberola; Maria-Jesus Pinazo; Alheli Rodriguez-Cortes; Julio Alonso-Padilla
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Phytochemical Screening and Antiprotozoal Effects of the Methanolic Berberis vulgaris and Acetonic Rhus coriaria Extracts.

Authors:  Gaber El-Saber Batiha; Amany Magdy Beshbishy; Oluyomi Stephen Adeyemi; Eman Hassan Nadwa; Eman Kadry Mohamed Rashwan; Luay M Alkazmi; Amr A Elkelish; Ikuo Igarashi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 10.  Twenty Years of Equine Piroplasmosis Research: Global Distribution, Molecular Diagnosis, and Phylogeny.

Authors:  Sharon Tirosh-Levy; Yuval Gottlieb; Lindsay M Fry; Donald P Knowles; Amir Steinman
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-11-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.