Literature DB >> 29498810

Bioturbation and directionality in Earth's carbon isotope record across the Neoproterozoic-Cambrian transition.

R A Boyle1,2, T W Dahl3, C J Bjerrum4, D E Canfield2.   

Abstract

Mixing of sediments by moving animals becomes apparent in the trace fossil record from about 550 million years ago (Ma), loosely overlapping with the tail end of the extreme carbonate carbon isotope δ13 Ccarbonate fluctuations that qualitatively distinguish the Proterozoic geochemical record from that of the Phanerozoic. These Precambrian-scale fluctuations in δ13 Ccarbonate (PSF-δ13 Ccarbonate ) remain enigmatic, due to their high amplitude and inclusion of global-scale negative δ13 Ccarbonate values, below anything attributable to mantle input. Here, we note that different biogeochemical-model scenarios plausibly explaining globally synchronous PSF-δ13 Ccarbonate converge: via mechanistic requirements for extensive anoxia in marine sediments to support sedimentary build-up of 13 C-depleted carbon. We hypothesize that bioturbation qualitatively reduced marine sediment anoxia by exposing sediments to oxygenated overlying waters, which ultimately contributed to decreasing the carbon cycle's subsequent susceptibility to PSF- δ13 Ccarbonate . Bioturbation may also have reduced the quantity of (isotopically light) organic-derived carbon available to contribute to PSF- δ13 Ccarbonate via ocean crust carbonatization at depth. We conduct a comparative modelling exercise in which we introduce bioturbation to existing model scenarios for PSF- δ13 Ccarbonate : expressing both the anoxic proportion of marine sediments, and the global organic carbon burial efficiency, as a decreasing function of bioturbation. We find that bioturbation's oxygenating impact on sediments has the capacity to prevent PSF- δ13 Ccarbonate caused by authigenic carbonate precipitation or methanogenesis. Bioturbation's impact on the f-ratio via remineralization is partially offset by liberation of organic phosphate, some of which feeds back into new production. We emphasize that this study is semiquantitative, exploratory and intended merely to provide a qualitative theoretical framework within which bioturbation's impact on long-term, first-order δ13 Ccarbonate can be assessed (and it is hoped quantified in more detail by future work). With this proviso, we conclude that it is entirely plausible that bioturbation made a decisive contribution to the enigmatic directionality in the δ13 Ccarbonate record, from the Neoproterozoic-Cambrian boundary onwards.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neoproterozoic; biogeochemistry; bioturbation; cambrian substrate revolution; carbon isotope record; evolution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29498810     DOI: 10.1111/gbi.12277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geobiology        ISSN: 1472-4669            Impact factor:   4.407


  5 in total

Review 1.  The rise and early evolution of animals: where do we stand from a trace-fossil perspective?

Authors:  M Gabriela Mángano; Luis A Buatois
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 2.  The evolution of complex life and the stabilization of the Earth system.

Authors:  Jonathan L Payne; Aviv Bachan; Noel A Heim; Pincelli M Hull; Matthew L Knope
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  A largely invariant marine dissolved organic carbon reservoir across Earth's history.

Authors:  Mojtaba Fakhraee; Lidya G Tarhan; Noah J Planavsky; Christopher T Reinhard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Assessing the expansion of the Cambrian Agronomic Revolution into fan-delta environments.

Authors:  Andrei Ichaso; Luis A Buatois; M Gabriela Mángano; Patty Thomas; Don Marion
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Atmosphere-ocean oxygen and productivity dynamics during early animal radiations.

Authors:  Tais W Dahl; James N Connelly; Da Li; Artem Kouchinsky; Benjamin C Gill; Susannah Porter; Adam C Maloof; Martin Bizzarro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.