Literature DB >> 29498424

Discounting model selection with area-based measures: A case for numerical integration.

Shawn P Gilroy1, Donald A Hantula2.   

Abstract

A novel method for analyzing delay discounting data is proposed. This newer metric, a model-based Area Under Curve (AUC) combining approximate Bayesian model selection and numerical integration, was compared to the point-based AUC methods developed by Myerson, Green, and Warusawitharana (2001) and extended by Borges, Kuang, Milhorn, and Yi (2016). Using data from computer simulation and a published study, comparisons of these methods indicated that a model-based form of AUC offered a more consistent and statistically robust measurement of area than provided by using point-based methods alone. Beyond providing a form of AUC directly from a discounting model, numerical integration methods permitted a general calculation in cases when the Effective Delay 50 (ED50) measure could not be calculated. This allowed discounting model selection to proceed in conditions where data are traditionally more challenging to model and measure, a situation where point-based AUC methods are often enlisted. Results from simulation and existing data indicated that numerical integration methods extended both the area-based interpretation of delay discounting as well as the discounting model selection approach. Limitations of point-based AUC as a first-line analysis of discounting and additional extensions of discounting model selection were also discussed.
© 2018 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Keywords:  Bayesian methods; decision-making; delay discounting; numerical integration; software

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29498424     DOI: 10.1002/jeab.318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  Modeling Treatment-Related Decision-Making Using Applied Behavioral Economics: Caregiver Perspectives in Temporally-Extended Behavioral Treatments.

Authors:  Shawn P Gilroy; Brent A Kaplan
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2020-05

2.  A Monte Carlo method for comparing generalized estimating equations to conventional statistical techniques for discounting data.

Authors:  Jonathan E Friedel; William B DeHart; Anne M Foreman; Michael E Andrew
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Furthering Open Science in Behavior Analysis: An Introduction and Tutorial for Using GitHub in Research.

Authors:  Shawn P Gilroy; Brent A Kaplan
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2019-05-24

4.  Monte Carlo Analyses for Single-Case Experimental Designs: An Untapped Resource for Applied Behavioral Researchers and Practitioners.

Authors:  Jonathan E Friedel; Alison Cox; Ann Galizio; Melissa Swisher; Megan L Small; Sofia Perez
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-11-24

5.  Beyond Systematic and Unsystematic Responding: Latent Class Mixture Models to Characterize Response Patterns in Discounting Research.

Authors:  Shawn P Gilroy; Justin C Strickland; Gideon P Naudé; Matthew W Johnson; Michael Amlung; Derek D Reed
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Social discounting of pain.

Authors:  Giles W Story; Zeb Kurth-Nelson; Molly Crockett; Ivo Vlaev; Ara Darzi; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.215

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.